this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2026
303 points (98.1% liked)

News

37083 readers
2997 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 156 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Man, it sure didn't take long to pivot from "We need to invade Iran to protect those poor protestors from their evil government" to "Bomb 'em back to the stone age".

How strange. It's almost like Trump didn't have the best intentions of the Iranian people at heart from the get go.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 54 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To anyone that was actually fooled by this, when we start bombing Cuba, please remember to not listen to the Cuban diaspora that cheer on the bombing as some form of liberation. Remember all of the Iranian diaspora that cheered on Iran being invaded? They do not care about the country they or their parents left for the US. And with Cuba, there is a high likelihood they are the children of slave plantation owners that fled Cuba after the revolution.

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m living in Miami right now and there are no bigger “victims” than some Cubans here. Everything is someone else’s fault. If it weren’t for the revolution, they would be rich!

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The weirdest ones are the ones that say their parents/grandparents "fled communism"; and then you ask them "when?" and they say "1953".

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago

Marco Rubio

[–] homes@piefed.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

From the get-go? You mean the get-go where we blew up an elementary school full of little girls?

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Yes that's the joke they're making

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Naich@piefed.world 128 points 1 week ago (3 children)

He is a disgrace to the noble tradition of the FIFA peace prize.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 week ago

Lucky for him, the Amazon Oscar is still within reach

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 14 points 1 week ago

He's the only FIFA peace prize recipient to ever start a war.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 92 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Your tax dollars at work. You could’ve had free education, Medicare for all, functioning roads and infrastructure, end homelessness, but instead we’re bombing fucking brown people in the Middle East. Let’s waste all this money and blow up the fucking desert mountains in Iran while simultaneously fucking over the rest of the world and raising gas prices to 10 bucks a gallon.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There is something slightly humbling about the fact that in the face of so much firepower and human "destruction"; that it can be countered well simply by the powers of nature and some human planning.

Basically, yeah, you have trillions of dollars of weapons research and ammunition spreading over decades. Nice. But we're just gonna use natural geological structures, the best concrete recipe known to man, Toyota trucks, and low cost drones we optimized to all hell for affordability. We'll be here until you decide to leave...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago

That would be….gasp….socialism

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What gets me is there is still people supporting this. I find it hard to imagine how we'll ever progress given we can't even agree on the problems to be solved.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 71 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Wait didn’t we do that a year ago when we had a single attack that somehow destroyed all of their nuclear capabilities?

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 week ago

They got better.

Probably happen again.

Trump's an idiot.

We're paying for his stupidity.

This should stop...but it doesn't.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 14 points 1 week ago

You weren't supposed to remember that!

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago

"completely and totally decimated" -Trump

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 63 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm confused. I thought they had 48 hours to reopen the straight, but not really because talks were going well, but still 10 days until the US destroys all the infrastructure, but talks have been productive, and the war is going to be over any day now, but it doesn't matter because we don't need the oil, but we could take over the oil fields, but Europe should help us, but we don't need them and they should do it themselves.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Epstein files seem so long ago now

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago

I'm sure there are plenty of other CIA/Mossad pedo-honeypots operating.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 8 points 1 week ago

Don't worry, they're working on a sequel 🤮

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 week ago (3 children)

No country has ever surrendered unconditionally from conventional airstrikes.

So we're either going to see boots on the ground (well, they're in the area), or more tiny hand flailing within that time frame.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Especially a country run by a threatened regime. If the IRGC give in, they’re dead. They also have established that they don’t care about the human cost.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oddly enough, does this not also apply to the USA?

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 week ago

Absolutely correct. But I think the republicans are actually in worse state than the IRGC; they are the aggressors and clearly perceived that way by a lot of their base, and there’s still the idea of free elections.

[–] ApatheticCactus@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

That's why I always have one old unupgraded pikeman hanging around since 560BC to take over cities.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 25 points 1 week ago

This is EXACTLY what Jesus would Say!

-Trump's Faith Advisor!

[–] Slashme@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

In his 1965 autobiography (co-written with MacKinlay Kantor), LeMay is quoted as saying his response to North Vietnam would be to demand that "they've got to draw in their horns and stop their aggression, or we're going to bomb them back into the Stone Age.

Is that really a quote that you want to lean on, Donny? Not exactly a great omen.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Everything is 2 or 3 weeks. 10 years from now, it will over in 2 or 3 weeks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tal@lemmy.today 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

My guess is that Trump doesn't have Congressional support for an AUMF, which means that all Iran has to do is last for 60 days before Trump has to pull out.

So basically, if Trump wants some kind of deal that uses the military as leverage, he has to get it closed in a matter of weeks.

[–] GrabtharsHammer@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

But what if he just ignores the 60 day limit, and then we all wait till two years later for a court to finally decide that wasn't legal and he should stop?

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Right. He's technically not supposed to be able to start a war either. But here we are

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zemo@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Any miltary strategist will say that you can't bomb your way to a victory.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

These idiots and their scorched earth threats. Worst B-movie villains ever.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Still don't know why.

Just know we can't have nice things here.

[–] MisterD@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

Because it stopped a lot of the Epstein questions

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 week ago (3 children)

And the oil markets responded appropriately, WTI is now $112.

Bye bye any economic performance for all of 2026!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Foni@piefed.zip 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The situation has no way out. Leaving without opening the strait ruins the Gulf States that own a large part of the American economy that would go to hell. Opening the strait without troops on the ground is impossible, troops on the ground will be a pickle in lives and material as not seen since the Second World War. I think before this is over he will be seriously considering the nuclear option, I hope they can stop him before that

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

I hope a clot stops him before then because there’s a much better chance of that than any of the spineless people in government suddenly doing anything about anything.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We could always fold to their demands

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 week ago

Of course. It worked for Vietnam after all the combined ordinance used in WWII was dropped there and its neighbors of Laos and Cambodia. Oh no wait the US still failed spectacularly. Is the US gonna have another forever war just to hide the president's role in a massive pedophile ring?

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I hope the sons and grandsons of MAGAs get hauled off to boot camp.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 10 points 1 week ago

Will this be like how their military has been wiped out? Doesn't he realise everyone just calls his bluff because he literally never goes through with anything he threatens.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

These clowns and their maximalist bullshit. Were they playing paddycake for the past 5 weeks?

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Now now, he shouldn't get ahead of himself! He should deploy the thousands of troops he said he would, then bomb Iran. Except in his pure stupidity, he'll bomb the soldiers he's deployed to Iran, yet claim it was some 67D chess move.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

Bro just two more weeks I promise we'll be done we just need three more weeks to finish our goals bro just a month and we'll have accomplished this mission bro we just need two more months I promise we'll be done in Iran if we can just keep bombing them for three months bro we will have a peace deal in the next five months bro please just let us keep fighting bro just six more months bro

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Seems like it was never about nuclear weapons.

load more comments
view more: next ›