MisterFrog

joined 3 years ago
[–] MisterFrog@aussie.zone 0 points 1 week ago

Interesting read, thanks for sharing :)

[–] MisterFrog@aussie.zone 0 points 1 week ago

I'm glad they're doing this. Despite me disagreeing that Allegra Spender is "centrist". She consistently votes against improvements to workers rights.

She just happens to believe in climate change and that queer people deserve rights.

At a minimum, she's right wing on economic and class questions.

[–] MisterFrog@aussie.zone 0 points 1 week ago

Redundancy legislation/regulation is already massively stacked in favour of the employer.

There is no formalised process they're supposed to do, as far as I'm aware. They're just supposed to do a process. It seems largely determined by case law...

Also it's only 3 MONTHS before they can hire people again for the same role, and that again is not legislated/regulated. Just seems to be the rule of thumb/case law. (I am not a lawyer).

Meaning 1. you have to know they've rehired someone and 2. You need to take them to court for unfair dismissal.

Absolute joke.

Reminder to all that the Labor party is pretty weak on workers rights, it's just they're km ahead of the LNP and One Nation.

Hope these two workers get a just outcome.

[–] MisterFrog@aussie.zone 0 points 1 week ago

That's true. Should be a hoot haha

[–] MisterFrog@aussie.zone 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

After having stayed I'm Brisbane for a couple weeks for work once, and seeing how car dependent it was, when I heard the news they'd bid for the Olympics, I thought they must be joking haha

It's gonna be such a shitshow

[–] MisterFrog@aussie.zone 0 points 1 week ago

It's sad at how obvious it is, and how few people are engaged enough to want to do something about it :(

On a positive note, Vic Socialists/Aus Socialists has grown massively recently.

Still a small party though.

Next biggest after the Greens I'd guess though. Pretty much all other parties are tiny outside of Labor/LNP/One Nation/Greens

[–] MisterFrog@aussie.zone 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

https://youtu.be/wkZ9Q3kOgR8?t=2295

Timestamped to jump to where Pauline Hanson starts talking about the "transgender insurgency" in Australia.

The campaign linked by OP is The Greens mocking her

(This YouTube channel doesn't seem to be blocked in Japan which is where my VPN I tested this with connected to, so presumably should work elsewhere too)

[–] MisterFrog@aussie.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I will be shocked if anything beyond telling Israel that Australia has "deep concerns" is actually done.

The Labor party is piss weak on this.

[–] MisterFrog@aussie.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This is a stupid take. The problem is only parents who aren't teaching their kids properly.

A bit of noise from some slightly rowdy children is not a big deal.

Let's not further isolate our society. Parents should feel free to bring their kids along places so they can still socialise.

I say this as someone without children.

[–] MisterFrog@aussie.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago

One Nation are basically Reform UK, I'd say

[–] MisterFrog@aussie.zone 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Is this the same Labour Party who banned Palestine Action?

Colour me "press X to doubt".

Leave Labor/Labour, people, for parties who actually share your values. Ffs.

What an absolute farce.

[–] MisterFrog@aussie.zone 0 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

In the case of Melbourne, the enemy likes to arrives to the F1 and the Melbourne Cup by Helicopter.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.today/post/54459152

Me_irl

 

cross-posted from: https://aussie.zone/post/33395211

* provided you have decently well functioning public service, and it's not a country with high levels of corruption.

I hold the belief that things being equal there is almost no situation in which privatisation of public services has ever been a positive for the average person.

However, I'm keen to hear arguments, examples or studies where privatisation has gone well [1], and has been a net positive to society, and could not have been performed by the government.

I don't believe there are such examples, and I believe (with too many real world examples to list) that privatisation always leads to enshittification and budget blow outs eventually because private companies exist to maximise profits.

This community (!aussocialism@aussie.zone) does not delete comments that disagree with socialism, so you're very much encouraged to share your views respectfully.

[1] for countries that have some level of democracy at that point in history i.e. I'm not really interested in the example of China becoming capitalist, 1. because Chinese "socialism" was never control of society by the workers, and was (and still is) a top-down hierarchical dictatorship - which had a ruling class determined by party position, and now also determined by wealth. No wonder that things were being run so poorly before they decided to be capitalist. Dictatorships don't usually breed very good conditions for sensible management. 2. They still have most core government services being administered by government departments.

 

cross-posted from: https://aussie.zone/post/32422810

Federal government to contribute nearly $4b extra to Victoria's Suburban Rail Loop

How do we all feel about the SRL?

Personally, I don't hate it, but feel like money could have been better spent on numerous cheaper projects (like tram/train extentions for interconnectivity, or massively increasing bus frequencies and rationalising bus routes).

But I'm glad for any money to be spent on better public transport, and not more roads.

 

How do we all feel about the SRL?

Personally, I don't hate it, but feel like money could have been better spent on numerous cheaper projects (like tram/train extentions for interconnectivity, or massively increasing bus frequencies and rationalising bus routes).

But I'm glad for any money to be spent on better public transport, and not more roads.

X-Posted to c/Melbourne

 

cross-posted from: https://aussie.zone/post/31075060

Perhaps the one silver lining to US imperialism, is that more people will want better public transport

 

Perhaps the one silver lining to US imperialism, is that more people will want better public transport

 

We have a mixed system in our federal parliament. We have a lower house made up of 150 preferential, winner-takes-all electorates, and an upper house of multi-member electorates for each state and territory elected Hare–Clark proportional representation.

My topic of discussion today is whether we would benefit from altering the lower house, and what way would you alter it (or not).

I'm personally not a fan of making the lower house as proportional as the upper house, as many government functions are legislated to be controlled by government ministers, which necessitates the lower house forming a governing coalition. This is made much harder under high levels of proportional representation (see Tasmania & many european countries).

I'm only not a fan because I think the general public doesn't like seeing slow moving government. I actually think it's fine.

However, I personally think a pragmatic change would be to increase the lower house MPs by 50% from 150 to 225, and then have 75 electorates of 3 members each.

This way, you retain the local representation, while removing "safe" seats that parties ignore, as it's likely at least one member is in doubt every election.

Keen to hear people's ideas, and pet proposals.

(Note, I am not a political scholar so won't have used the most correct jargon.)

 

My commentary:

By my understanding, the only tools the RBA have to control inflation are: setting interest rates, and quantitative tightening (and conversely easing).

Surely, there must be more regulatory powers we could give them. Understandably, many inflationary controlling functions should remain legislative/departmental, but the bank can act decisively and quickly, so SOME extra powers are in order, in my opinion, so they don't constantly resort to ONLY increasing mortgages and therefore rent as well, every single time.

Just spit-balling here: variable tax rates (income and corporate). Since taxation is so damn unpopular (not to me, tax is necessary to have a functioning society under capitalism), it would make some sense to give regulatory power to alter taxation rates (within a legislated range) to the independent RBA. Let them take the flak for increasing the top tax bracket rate by 3% or something.

What are your opinions/ideas about the RBA?

(Sorry if against community rules, but there weren't any in the side bar)

 

cross-posted from: https://aussie.zone/post/29742117

The "big switch" has ended up being a lot less big than originally promised. I'm really happy we now have a turn up and go service - or at least every 10 minutes - on the lines going through the Metro Tunnel (the Munnel), but feels really silly we haven't brought more drivers on board to run services at least every 10 minutes across the network, and upped all bus routes to the same frequency.

There's a great map that Taitset made showing sections of the metro network which could already do 10 minute running.

My mum, who's in her late 60s, told me of growing up in [European city]. She interchanged 2 times between 2 trains and a bus on her way too highschool. Her and her friends didn't like the bus because it only came every 10 minutes. In the 1970s.

It's a bit embarrassing to me how bad our frequency is, given our massive population.

It would be great if we could convince our government or MPs holding the balance of power at the next state election to invest in a larger workforce to achieve the frequency PTV needs to thrive.

Keen to hear others thoughts on the "Big Switch".

P.S. I've talked to multiple colleagues who live on the lines who literally didn't know about the "Big Switch" until I told them about it, 2 days beforehand.

 

The "big switch" has ended up being a lot less big than originally promised. I'm really happy we now have a turn up and go service - or at least every 10 minutes - on the lines going through the Metro Tunnel (the Munnel), but feels really silly we haven't brought more drivers on board to run services at least every 10 minutes across the network, and upped all bus routes to the same frequency.

There's a great map that Taitset made showing sections of the metro network which could already do 10 minute running.

My mum, who's in her late 60s, told me of growing up in [European city]. She interchanged 2 times between 2 trains and a bus on her way too highschool. Her and her friends didn't like the bus because it only came every 10 minutes. In the 1970s.

It's a bit embarrassing to me how bad our frequency is, given our massive population.

It would be great if we could convince our government or MPs holding the balance of power at the next state election to invest in a larger workforce to achieve the frequency PTV needs to thrive.

Keen to hear others thoughts on the "Big Switch".

P.S. I've talked to multiple colleagues who live on the lines who literally didn't know about the "Big Switch" until I told them about it, 2 days beforehand.

Cross-posted to !melbourne@aussie.zone

 
 

cross-posted from: https://aussie.zone/post/22987236

I'm wondering whether I'll have to wait a long time after royal accent for the new penalty rates bill [1] to enjoy not having to work 40 hours a week (and finally be able to work a standard 38).

From what I can tell, the bill only requires the Fair Work Commission to make/update awards such that you must be paid overtime, meaning the professional employees award won't be valid anymore (where they don't have to unless you earn less than 1.25x of minimum wage).

I'm wondering what your opinion/guess is (not legal advice) on whether we'll need to wait for the award to be updated, or can just go to our employers and say: hey, I'm working 38 hours unless you want to pay me overtime.

I was part of my union, but since engineers are barely in the union, being part of a Professionals Australia (the union for my industry) was kind of a waste of time, and I tried many times to get in touch with their organiser team to push membership in my company to not avail.

Since then I let it lapse because I thought they were doing a pretty bad job, since you can't have solidarity by yourself. In any case, that's why I can't ask them

[1] Fair Work Amendment (Protecting Penalty and Overtime Rates) Bill 2025:

https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;db=LEGISLATION;id=legislation%2Fbills%2Fr7335_first-reps%2F0001;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbills%2Fr7335_first-reps%2F0000%22;rec=0

This is not yet law.

Ammends this act: [2] Fair Work Act 2009: https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2009A00028/latest/text

view more: next ›