this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2026
1 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

5056 readers
19 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I guess these people can start their own non family friendly businesses and see how that goes for them?

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago

You mean like nightclubs?

[–] mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 weeks ago

Or a caravan park (like the one mentioned in the article)

[–] DiaDeLosMuertos@aussie.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It would be nice to have adult only public transport. When I first had to regularly use public transport I thought the high schoolers were noisy shits. Jesus now I use a route that a mob of the younger ones use. The parents are there but they just watch the chaos.

Grrrrrr, get off my lawn, and ferry.

[–] jagungal@aussie.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Public transport is one of the only ways teenagers (among many other vulnerable groups) can get some independence in a very car-centric society. You'd be fighting an uphill battle trying convince people to exclude kids from the public transport system.

[–] notgold@aussie.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago

100%. Parents today won't let their kids do much by themselves and this is normally where they start

[–] eureka@aussie.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

and ferry

Keelhaul the kiddos!


Some of our trains have quiet carriages, which are nice. I haven't been on many but I haven't seen them noisy either.

[–] bootstrap@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 weeks ago

She also cited multiple flights where a child screamed "its head off".

"If I did the same thing, I'd be kicked out of somewhere.

  1. Headphones
  2. What?? No shit genious. How unfair for you.
[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There’s a café in Berlin named The Barn which has this philosophy: the doorway has a bollard in the middle to impede the entry of prams.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I bet it’s also great for preventing wheelchairs

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago

Not only the prams and the wheelchairs it also prevents entry to the women.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ohhh i loathe people like this. They muddy the waters on bad parenting so hard.

When you've got ... kids jumping in the pool

This is called being a child. It is normal. The world does not cater to you exclusively, sit the fuck down. You are making it harder for the rest of us to get bad parents to stop letting their kids eat paint in bunnings

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Doesn't that go both ways though- the world doesn't exclusively cater to you either?

The only time I hear that line it's out of the mouths of people who think they don't have to ever accomodate anyone else.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago

They're literally complaining about children being, well, children. Including bitching about a kid screaming on a flight and "if i did that - "

She's a grown adult. Not a child still learning to emotionally regulate. I'm cf but there's a difference between being childfree and being so damned pig ignorant you throw a tantrum when children do not act like adults

Also what part of what i posted had anything to do with demanding catering

[–] budget_biochemist@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

choosing not to have kids

There's also the people who wanted to have kids, but weren't able to due to medical/fertility problems. The article mentions "fertility intentions" briefly, but doesn't really explore the psychology of it.

Much as people who are childfree by choice may be irritated by kids, for those who are "childfree by circumstance" it is much more painful to put up with other people's shag trophies.

[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Dang, not on my card for today

child free bingo card

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

What are you talking about. This is clearly, "It's different when it's your own!"

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Random Woman Has Random Opinion: More at 11!

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Who is ready to see the horrific downfall of the country due to crashing birth rates, like South Korea will be demonstrating for us over the next few decades?

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Oh no. Fewer people. What a fucking disaster.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago

It's much worse than that, rapid uncontrolled crash in population will make life hell

[–] Noobnarski@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The problem with population decline is always that there will eventually be a lot of retired old people who need support and not that many young people who support them.

I guess this isn't a problem if you just let old people have a miserable few last years but I personally want everyone to have a good time.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 0 points 2 weeks ago

I have heard this one before. But it still all really comes down to the economy demanding perpetual growth, no matter how you twist and turn it. Because under capitalism, there is never any equilibrium. There is only always perpetual growth, there is no "enough", there is no "this many people is optimal and keep it that way", it's only ever more more more.

The symptom you are describing is an effect of the disease, the ultimate consequence of which is death for us all.

If you allow for the doomsday preaching, of course, but I'm afraid that is the logical conclusion of all this unless it is stopped.

[–] No1@aussie.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Shhhhhhhhhhhh, Tanya!

You will alert the breeders to the secret quiet places!

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We have a declining population that needs more births and here we have hedonists making the world less kid friendly.

[–] DolphinLundgrin@aussie.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Why do we need more births?

[–] notgold@aussie.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Because we all need help as we get older. Whether it's cleaning solar panels or showering, we all need some level of help.

[–] bignose@aussie.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Because we all need help as we get older.

Yes, we do. Why do we need more births for that?

There are still plenty of people being born, and growing up and entering the work force as adults. We (i.e. society, i.e. whoever holds the purse strings) can offer better pay and better job conditions for those workers, so that it's a more appealing career for the people who will already be looking for jobs.

Better help for the people who will be born anyway. Not pushing for more births.

[–] notgold@aussie.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Who is performing the help? We don't have enough people now that want to help. Go to any nursing home and see that we need to import the help. If we want to continue that way then we need to grow. Either people are born here or we import births from other countries. Either way the births have to happen.

[–] bignose@aussie.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

We don’t have enough people now that want to help. Go to any nursing home and see that we need to import the help.

Don't want to help? At the pay rates and job conditions on offer, that's right.

An obvious solution is to raise the offered pay (by whatever means; the government can certainly afford to subsidise this) and improve the job conditions (by regulation enforcing proper treatment of workers).

There are plenty of people already here willing to work, if the work is properly remunerated and stable and dignified. If the job is worth doing – as we both agree it is – then let's show that, by making it feasible for plenty of people to have a dignified life doing that work.

[–] JillyB@beehaw.org 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The average worker is several times more productive than they were 100 years ago and women have entered as well. If we don't have enough workers, that's evidence the value isn't going where it should.

[–] notgold@aussie.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago

Half the shit inmyour house didn't exist 100 years ago. The things we need/want in our lives now take more effort to design and build. Go move in with the Amish if you want the 100 years ago life

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The issue is more births or more migration or both. Otherwise we have declining population which is totally incompatible with capitalism.

[–] wolfeh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago

I suspect that the people complaining are pretty strong on capitalism.

[–] shirro@aussie.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago

Pity her mother didn't feel the same way.

[–] MisterFrog@aussie.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This is a stupid take. The problem is only parents who aren't teaching their kids properly.

A bit of noise from some slightly rowdy children is not a big deal.

Let's not further isolate our society. Parents should feel free to bring their kids along places so they can still socialise.

I say this as someone without children.

[–] mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 weeks ago

It’s completely fine to ask for some spaces to be adults only and no children.

Honestly some kids are annoying shits and I reckon parents would probably appreciate those spaces when the grandparents or others are looking after their own.

[–] arbilp3@aussie.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago

Let’s not further isolate our society. Parents should feel free to bring their kids along places so they can still socialise.

Totally agree. And it's not that difficult to find quiet places. I'd like to see more kids out and about be safe and playing, laughing, screaming, whatever, or meeting other people in the company of their parents so they learn about community and communication. So many kids are cooped up with their parents and with gadgets indoors day in and day out.

it's like we want to warehouse the old, warehouse the kids and warehouse precious adults. This is no way to have a healthy community.

[–] Longmactoppedup@aussie.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago

Rage bait.

This woman will cop plenty of hate on social media.

How daft do you need to be to say these things to the media and let them use your name and photo?

[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What's wrong with having some spaces for adults to enjoy the company of other adults without someone's semen demon around?

[–] bignose@aussie.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago

For one thing, I want our society to welcome children, not dehumanise them as “semen demon”.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I don't think there needs to be a conflict in public with child and not child places, honestly. also I grew up in NV and CA, pretty much everywhere used to be less child friendly in public when I was a kid. you can walk kids through a casino now, they used to really physically stop you in the 80s-90s