bootstrap

joined 9 months ago
[–] bootstrap@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 6 days ago

Yes. Once you see the shit you get off your tongue you can never return to before.

[–] bootstrap@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Youre a fuckin loser haha

[–] bootstrap@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Thanks for the ID

[–] bootstrap@lemmy.dbzer0.com 59 points 1 month ago (15 children)

Top one is pine, bottom one looks like oak?

Not even the same timber if so. Pine is softwood Oak is hardwood.

[–] bootstrap@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

Then theyre too far gone

[–] bootstrap@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Get off your phone dude that shit does not help, if you posted this from a laptop then I have no response.

[–] bootstrap@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Added enoki mushrooms and did it in the pressure cooker like the original recipe. Holy moly this is good.

[–] bootstrap@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

I agree with most of that, however the mentality for liability is the same as "well what was she wearing" victim blaming. The parents arent the perpetrators.

I agree that parental knowledge to properly moderate kids usage of the internet is an issue - a skill issue. But that doesnt mean its their fault the kids get addicted to these things and exploited. The ones who openly do not care are a different story, thats child neglent as far as I am concerned.

I agree age verification and ID checks are absolutely not the answer and trying to censor the internet is not the answer. I think the answer more likely lies in holding companies accountable. There are reasons standards exist in many industries - to protect the consumer. As far as I am aware no standards exist when dealing with social media platforms.

[–] bootstrap@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

Apologies I had a technical difficulty and posted the same comment several times.

view more: next ›