eureka

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] eureka@aussie.zone 0 points 1 day ago

Yep, of the Axis of Awesome (Four Chords Song). They have plenty of good stuff, I find the live requests melodica Human Jukebox compilation a fun view each year.

[–] eureka@aussie.zone 0 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's a pretty reasonable long-term goal in many areas, like cities. There are pedestrian-only streets near me already. We just need a long-term vision and the infrastructure to follow it.

[–] eureka@aussie.zone 1 points 2 days ago

They both prevented people driving while intoxicated, they're goddamn heroes!

[–] eureka@aussie.zone 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Our union organisers openly say that, despite most managers being given explicit anti-union chilling off-the-record, managers up to a certain grade are covered by our contracts and have an immediate interest in standing with us. There are already a few lower managers and HR staff as members, which is sometimes useful.

 

cross-posted from: https://aussie.zone/post/31732255

It looks like OpenStreetMap has them listed as a garden, which I think makes sense: https://www.openstreetmap.org/query?lat=-33.887330&lon=151.199083

 

cross-posted from: https://aussie.zone/post/31732255

It looks like OpenStreetMap has them listed as a garden, which I think makes sense: https://www.openstreetmap.org/query?lat=-33.887330&lon=151.199083

 

It looks like OpenStreetMap has them listed as a garden, which I think makes sense: https://www.openstreetmap.org/query?lat=-33.887330&lon=151.199083

[–] eureka@aussie.zone 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's not what I said. I said it can't do its advertised job, which is very different from its real job.

  • This tool is obviously about building control. That's why it has these investors. We both understand that. "It is a censorship tool"
  • However, the tool's marketing lies and gives the public a false premise for its existence - they claim this tool is made to combat misinformation by determining real truth. We both understand it's not made to do that. But perhaps, there could be readers in the general public who take it at face value and might believe that's the real purpose.
  • My point is that, it barely even tries at building that false premise. I'm not saying it won't be able to do its real job and censor dissent, if it gains institutional power.
[–] eureka@aussie.zone 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

I know that it's very obviously a dangerous political tool if it gains any institutional power. And if you don't understand that, watch the video. But even on a technical, non-social level:

There is no real explanation given as so how this system will supposedly determine truth. Just vague pointing to inapplicable abstracted concepts like scientific method and law.

There is 0% (not rounded down) chance that this system can do its advertised job. It is a censorship tool.

[–] eureka@aussie.zone 0 points 3 days ago

Almost tempted to say One Nation, because the more seats they have, the quicker their infighting begins. (I'll save you the counting - all 11 left)

But it will also be entertaining if nothing else to see them lose it and cry again.

[–] eureka@aussie.zone 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Dude has been in solitary confinement in Lithgow for over three years so far. That’s frankly pretty damn harsh all on its own for the accusation of ‘three cases of military training’.

I thought the max security prison was a bit extreme - their alleged crime is obviously serious to the state, but hardly one that requires high security or solitary.

[–] eureka@aussie.zone 0 points 4 days ago

Also: haha

In 1969 the Gorton administration was severely embarrassed by a renowned This Day Tonight story in which a conscientious objector, who had been on the run from police for several months, was interviewed live in the studio by the journalist Richard Carleton, who then posed awkward questions to the Army Minister about why TDT had been able to locate the man within hours and bring him to the studio when the federal police had been unable to capture him, and the event was made even more embarrassing for the government because the man was able to leave the studio before the police had arrived to arrest him.

[–] eureka@aussie.zone 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Useful summary of the last time we had conscription and the opposition movement: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conscription_in_Australia#Vietnam_War

[–] eureka@aussie.zone 0 points 5 days ago

Coles remix when

[–] eureka@aussie.zone 0 points 5 days ago

It's important to understand that Australia, like plenty of other countries, has its own imperial interests in the region. It's unhelpful to blindly assert someone has to be blackmailed in order to abide by these horrors.

 

cross-posted from: https://aussie.zone/post/31625931

Socialist Alternative leaders in the new electoral front want to ban caucuses from identifying with the party in public. NSW Socialists member Clarrie Lewis – writing in a personal capacity – argues this is a tipping point in defining the organisation’s democratic culture.


After the caucus publicly supported an ‘End the Blockade of Cuba’ demonstration in March, the secretary wrote insisting that Bread & Roses remove the reference to NSW Socialist Party from its logo.

Bread & Roses caucus members were told:

“The Bread and Roses Caucus has included NSW Socialists Party on its logo. I’m writing to inform you that this will need to be removed.”

[...]

“There are a whole series of political and legal implications if this is not adhered to. We are unable to authorise material produced by an internal grouping.”


Attempts to justify this restriction by invoking unspecified “political and legal implications” is a complete fabrication. A banner that says “Bread & Roses – NSW Socialist Party” is not an attempt to make statements under the NSW Electoral Act in the name of the registered party (New South Wales Soc). No reasonable person would think this.


The present dispute is therefore not about logos.

It is about what kind of political organisation NSW Socialists intends to become.

 

Today [April 8th], Chandler-Mather relaunches the revamped Institute as a movement building organisation, with the aim of filling critical capacity gaps identified during the 2025 federal election.

Max was previously the strategist for the Queensland Greens between 2017 to 2022, during the most successful period in the party’s history, where they won the state seats of South Brisbane and Maiwar, and three federal seats in 2022.

The release is short, I recommend reading all the quotes, but here are some critical ones:

“This year the Green Institute will have three main focuses. One, mobilising volunteers to talk to tens of thousands of people across the country in the largest survey of economic and social life outside of the census. Rather than relying on focus groups and corporate polling, politics done right involves talking to people and actually asking them what they need to live a good life.”

“Two, the Institute will work on developing a broader vision and set of policies that speak to the hopes, desires and needs of the millions of Australians being left behind by a political and economic system that puts corporate profit first and everyday people last.”

“Three, we are going to go to every corner of this country to offer the training, skills and knowledge people need to participate themselves in building a mass movement ready to transform this country for the better.”

 

cross-posted from: https://aussie.zone/post/31253546

You can find some of the headlines in Trove:

 

A video focusing on the cases of political manipulation in the Epstein Files, including multiple cases of Australian politics being manipulated by the Epstein class, rather than focusing on shocking highlights of child abuse.

 

(Reported on Friday, didn't see it here.)

 

cross-posted from: https://aussie.zone/post/30100482

I might get around later to posting more union songs from this site.

 

cross-posted from: https://aussie.zone/post/30022453

cross-posted from: https://aussie.zone/post/30019338

In the 1940s, the Communist Party of Australia was approaching the peak of its power as the largest and most influential left-wing organisation in Australian history.

The Communist Party of Australia demanded far more of its members than an average political organisation. To be a communist, you were expected not just to become an activist and an organiser, but to read and study deeply, and to understand often complex theoretical texts. And so with thousands of new members flocking to it, the Communist Party established one of the most ambitious systems of adult education ever seen in Australia – the Marx Schools.

Based in several capital cities, the Marx Schools ran from 10am to 10pm every day of the week, and offered CPA members and sympathisers extensive, in-depth courses in socialist and Marxist theory, in the practicalities of union organising, in how to chair meetings and give public speeches, in anti-fascism and women’s rights, and in art, economics, philosophy and literature. With a pedagogy far more advanced and participatory than most universities, and in an era when most Australians had no formal education beyond age 13 or 14, the Marx Schools taught thousands of workers how to both understand the world and how to change it.

To discuss this remarkable experiment in Australian adult education, we’re joined in this episode by Bob Boughton, a former academic and social worker who’s done extensive research on the Marx Schools.

Boughton’s PhD thesis about adult education in the Communist Party of Australia:

https://www.academia.edu/19259023/Educating_the_Educators_The_Communist_Party_of_Australia_and_Its_Influence_on_Australian_Adult_Education

view more: next ›