this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
4 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

22511 readers
961 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

For the billionaires planning on buying everything up to finish up Russiafying our Oligarch it's a great thing.

[–] Frjttr@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago

The moment you realize you're getting a golden shower from Trump who didn't drink enough water.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Hmm you should probably head to your basement if you have one if that's the case lolol

[–] lordnikon@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Yeah good news for his boss Putin the rest of the world not so much.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

We had a 22 percent increase in domestic investment.

That's good, it really is, but that in and of itself doesn't mean much. Industrial production left the US for a reason. What's changed? The cost of living has only gone up, especially housing, which means the cost of domestic labor is still going to be much higher than many other countries, so how do these US producers plan to turn this new capital investment into a profitable enterprise? How are they going to profitably produce quality goods that Americans can actually afford? Are they only going to make luxury goods for the highest income Americans? If so, who's going to serve the middle and the bottom income levels?

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is precisely like when Russia's currency tanked like a stricken submarine, which meant their PPP-adjusted GDP shot up the rankings and became one of the highest numbers in the world, which all the tankies promptly seized upon and used as an example of why the sanctions are actually helping Russia, by boosting its domestic economy, which is why everything is going great.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The sanctions on Oil and Gas certainly were helping Russia because they are lacklusterly enforced but drove up the global prices, benefiting Russia.

By half assing sanctions, the EU and US helped bankroll Russias war chest in 2022.

https://energyandcleanair.org/financing-putins-war/

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

If so, who's going to serve the middle and the bottom income levels?

Certainly not the government!

[–] Galapagon@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

Maybe slave labor. Or possibly something that actively steals wealth. Like, buying out mortgages then telling families to triple up in the house to cover less food and higher rent. Basically whatever you can imagine that makes things worse for most of us is probably the plan.

[–] justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thing is the article says the actual domestic investment growth was 9.8%, not 22%.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Inventories was also most of that. Means less production in future quarters.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

who’s going to serve the middle and the bottom income levels?

And laughter ensued from the 1%

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

That's because all bad news is fake news now, everybody deserves the freedom to choose their own truth! /s

[–] tal@lemmy.today 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I expect that Navarro will be needing to do a "high prices are good news" bit once stockpiled goods in warehouses in the US also run dry.

If Trump thought that this statement would be a political winner, I suspect that he'd be doing it himself, rather than having Navarro doing so. Right now, the only thing that Trump's currently seeing net positives in the polls I've most-recently seen is his immigration policy. Not on the economy.

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago
[–] sundray@lemmus.org 0 points 1 year ago
[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 0 points 1 year ago

So is Ron Vera.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not a crazy thing to say if you don‘t particularly like the USA which I have to assume he doesn‘t.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago

Peter Retarddo's claim: Big imports ahead of tariffs beat down GDP, and he praised large investment growth.

The investment growth was largely inventories. Most of the imports go first to inventories, but a lot of the imports are in a bonded state, waiting for someone to pay the tariffs on them, or decide to ship them back. Generally, imports get subtracted from GDP, but are cancelled by inventories and eventual sales. Inventory growth is usually negative for future production/jobs.

Consumption did grow 1.8%, and it is a good estimate for stable growth. Except, in this case, consumption pulled forward from tariffs means lower levels next quarters, and bigger inflation adjustments downward.

https://www.bea.gov/news/2025/gross-domestic-product-1st-quarter-2025-advance-estimate

US has very corrupt GDP measurements, where high interest rates boost GDP calculation through the most corrupt component of Owner's equivalent Rent (about 14% of GDP). This is a made up non-transaction amount. Amazingly, US also adds "free financial services" as though a fair cost was charged into GDP.

load more comments
view more: next ›