aleq

joined 3 years ago
[–] aleq@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I find them quite useful, in some circumstances. I once went from very little Haskell knowledge to knowing how to use cabal, talk to a database and build a REST API with the help of an AI (I've done analogous things in Java before, but never in Haskell). This is my favourite example and for this kind of introduction I think it's very good. And maybe half of the time it's at least able to poke me in the right direction for new problems.

Copilot-like AI which just produces auto-complete is very useful to me, often writing exactly what I want to do for some repetitive tasks. Testing in particular. Just take everything it outputs with great scepticism and it's pretty useful.

[–] aleq@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The same goes for cooking, making coffee and a LOT of other things you do at home. It raises the market value because it's a chore some people want others to do for them.

[–] aleq@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I do think this is AI, but I don't think it's obviously AI. As someone said ChatGPT is probably trained more on formal writing than casual writing, LinkedIn is a place where you want to appear super smart so this is an environment where many will use a more formal style.

It's more the nothing burger of a comment that gives it away IMO. But then again, the reason people do this I believe is to be visible. If they comment on things it may pop up in their contacts' feeds, and if it catches the interest of that person it reflects positively on them. If it doesn't catch the interest of that person, it has still generated visibility for them.

[–] aleq@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

I assure you a great many people take Linux seriously.

[–] aleq@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Being absolutely sure about everything.

[–] aleq@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If the value of money goes down, prices go up.

[–] aleq@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

No no, the Russia collaborators are the actual politicians. This is just an aide.

[–] aleq@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Didn't know this guy before but it really doesn't matter if he was literally Hitler and decides to start using Linux. It's an operating system not a club, it really makes no difference. Maybe slightly more moderation for people on linux communities on mainstream platforms (e.g. reddit).

[–] aleq@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

'artists' (usually rich)

I ~~know~~ think you're trolling, but…

[–] aleq@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I prefer the old one, but it's really not much of a difference. New one looks a bit cheaper, like something you'd see on piracy sites or something.

Also just realised Jellyfin basically has the old YouTube design. Don't know if YT was first with it, but if so it was pretty influential, think it's quite common in many players.

[–] aleq@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

It's so weird tbh. It's a mutual need, they want people I want a job — why don't I ever get an email thanking me for my time?

[–] aleq@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

While I do think the EU is lacking the balls to do this, there's also some strategy to consider here. It certainly would be lovely if the EU would be more defensive, but also more damaging to the EU economy (at least in the short run, probably for a long time).

China is being painted as enemy number one, and there's long-standing beef between the countries. Trump lost or is losing the trade war, and needs to make himself not look weak. Meanwhile China wants to project strength internally. Whatever is happening between closed doors, China has everything to gain from humiliating the US at this point. Trumps incompetence is already evident, they just need to fuel the flames.

With the EU, the situation is wildly different. EU doesn't really want to project power, they want to project exactly as much power as is necessary not to seem weak but no more. It wants to show that it's a level-headed free trade partner ready to take the lead in the free world, the fairest and most stable market in the world.

...that's my take on it anyway. USE! USE! USE! USE! 🇪🇺

 

Title is quite self-explanatory, reason I wonder is because every now and then I think to myself "maybe distro X is good, maybe I should try it at some point", but then I think a bit more and realise it kind of doesn't make a difference - the only thing I feel kinda matters is rolling vs non-rolling release patterns.

My guiding principles when choosing distro are that I run arch on my desktop because it's what I'm used to (and AUR is nice to have), and Debian on servers because some people said it's good and I the non-rolling release gives me peace of mind that I don't have to update very often. But I could switch both of these out and I really don't think it would make a difference at all.

 

My homelab is connected through an already existing wireguard network, with one server acting as a central hub for a bunch of other nodes. So all nodes can communicate to eachother by just knowing this central hub.

I would like my home assistant to join this network, which on most distros just means installing wireguard and wireguard-tools, plopping my config into /etc/wireguard, and running systemctl enable --now wg-quick@homenet. But I can't figure out if the OS on the HA Yellow have a package manager, and it doesn't seem to use SystemD. So what would be the best way to install it and connect on boot?

There is a Wireguard addon that I'm sure works wonders, but it seems to me that it's meant to act as this central hub that I already have. If I'm wrong and this addon can be used to connect to an existing network I will happily use that, but last time I tried it I couldn't get it to work the way I wanted.

 

The group that drafted a key blueprint for Donald Trump’s second term convened a meeting in Washington D.C. this week to consider proposals for bulldozing the European Union (EU).

The Polish investigative outlet VSquare revealed that the Heritage Foundation gathered hardline conservative groups on 11 March to hear how they would overhaul the current structures of the EU.

The “closed-door workshop” featured a debate on a new paper produced by the lobby groups MCC and Ordo Iuris entitled: “The Great Reset: Restoring Member State Sovereignty in the 21st Century”.

view more: next ›