this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Cyberpunk

1778 readers
1 users here now

What is Cyberpunk?

Cyberpunk is a science-fiction sub-genre dealing with the integration of society and technology in dystopian settings. Often referred to as “low-life and high tech,” Cyberpunk stories deal with outsiders (punks) who fight against the oppressors in society (usually mega corporations that control everything) via technological means (cyber). If the punks aren’t actively fighting against a megacorp, they’re still dealing with living in a world completely dependent on high technology.

Cyberpunk characteristics include:

Prefixes for posts

This is a community focused on cyberpunk as a genre of fiction. Please post any news articles about our real world slipping into a dystopian nightmare at: !aboringdystopia@lemmy.world


Icon created by @hammerjack@lemmy.zip


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Damn. Zero Cool must be getting pretty close to retirement by now.

[–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 months ago

Nah crowd strike took his record, so now he's back at work

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

Zero Cool might have been lying lol

https://www.nytimes.com/sitemap/1988/08/10/

https://store.nytimes.com/products/new-york-times-front-page-reprint?variant=35826434120

Edit: the store link doesn't keep the date -_- you'll have to select the date to see the front page.

[–] bacon_pdp@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It was said by Lord Nikon not Zero Cool; also it is a quote from the movie Hackers

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I am aware. Thus the joke.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Odo@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Clearly he hacked the archive to cover his tracks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They're all jacked because back then the keyboards were so stiff and the patch cables were so heavy that joining a network and typing in your login credentials burned more calories than a half marathon

[–] tomkatt@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

That’s your idea of jacked?

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Seems pretty jacked to me.

[–] tomkatt@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago
[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Noodle arms, and I would know

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure I've ever seen a concave bicep before

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (5 children)

To be fair, the more built guys in the scene are what jacked looked like before it was common for normal people to just take steroids. They certainly aren't what someone that devoted enough time to computer hacking to be the best at it looked like. Since it already takes at least 4 hours a day to look like that without steroids.

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Are we looking at the same picture? Zero Cool has the best physique of the bunch and he's only "fit". None of their bodies require 4 hrs of gym time a day, unless they're trying to burn through like 4k calories using only a flat treadmill.

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

Go back and look at what people who spent hours in a gym per day looked like 50 years ago. Exercise hasn't changed, the only thing that has changed is what people take while exercising. It's even become common for people to admit they are taking steroids and not be ashamed of it anymore.

Back when this movie came out, that was a 4 hours a day gym body.

Our perspective and expectations of what is attainable steroid-free are so heavily skewed now. Like check out rock climbers, people that need to be both strong and flexible, so steroids aren't even an option for them. They can lift 150-200 pounds repeatedly for hours, and their arms look about like this guy in the movie. Then check out people that are just cultivating "big muscles" and compare what they can actually lift with those muscles. It looks ridiculous in comparison.

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It is a matter of efficiency. 4 hrs a day is high-intensity full body workout. If 4 hrs a day got you looking like that, you were not using your time efficiently. I guess, we need to define what you consider "going to/using the gym".

I'm just a guy who's been in some gyms, but most, normal dedicated people are in and out in about 2 hrs. They hit their target bodyparts and bounce. More than that and I'd assume you have to wait for machines, you're lazing around, or you're an athlete/in action movies.

And then, even beyond efficiency, it's about the body's ability to sustain any decent workout for 4 whole hours. The Rock might manage all that with the supplements he's taking and he still crams down thousands of calories to fuel himself. And none of these guys have the bulked weightlifter bodies.

Or they just run for 4 hrs. But I wouldn't really call that a "gym body".

If you have a source where these actors claim their physique is the result of 4 hrs of daily work in the gym, then I'll take up my complaint with them. But I'm gonna hard disagree every day of the week.

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I just mean our perspective of what strong looks like has been so shifted by steroids becoming main stream.

Like this is a bit of an outrageous example, but pranks like this are only possible because people can't possibly believe one of the strongest people on the planet can look this small.

https://youtu.be/YFbdukrZZHc

Giant muscles isn't strong, giant muscles is just for show. And back then it wasn't common for actors to use steroids yet. He had to work for those arms, they may look small now, but they were alot of work back then.

Honestly, I don't know how many hours exactly, but it was more than people would think it was nowadays.

[–] psycotica0@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 months ago

I get what you're going for, 100% things have shifted. Absolutely true.

But I'm not taking steroids, and I'm not spending 4 hours a day at the gym, and I basically have the same arms as that guy. At least in this photo. Maybe he's more jacked than he looks in the rest of the movie, I haven't seen it in a while, and I don't have shredded abs or anything. I'm not impressively fit. But I have arms that look kinda like that.

I think you've taken the steroids thing, which again is a legit thing, and maybe swung fully in the other direction and decided any muscle at all is a modern creation? Some dudes have arms. Just, attached to their shoulders.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 0 points 8 months ago

I'm roughly as big as him and I don't spend four hours a day in the gym. Nor do I take steroids.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The Rock is a good example of how the image of a jacked male body has changed to the extreme. In his old movies he looks skinny compared to his monstrous body he has today. Even though back then people thought he was quite buff. Though even back then people also had an unrealistic ideal of the male physique. Like people were calling Brad Pitt unhealthily skinny when he had his Fight Club body.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I'm sorry do you not see the biceps on that girl in the blue shirt

nvm somebody else said it already

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

Oh man, starting to feel old, Angeline Jolie referred to as blue shirt girl...

[–] DrDystopia@lemy.lol 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Before one can hack the planet, one must learn how to hack 1507 computers.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] DrDystopia@lemy.lol 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Some people just want to be one better. 170 times.

[–] cdf12345@lemmy.zip 0 points 8 months ago

Mess with the best, die like the rest

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

If your command&control center is on dial-up, it's easier to create a self-propagating virus that does not need to phone home

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

See, it's because 1337 resembles the word "LEET," short for "elite."

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I know but counting the infected machines and stopping at a specific number is hard if there is limited bandwidth to a central node (or no bandwidth in case of sneakerware). So early viruses could not be controlled once released nor tell if there's 1337 copies already.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The word "1337" is an important part of the hacker lexicon

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 0 points 8 months ago

Later on he started Overriding Crashes.

[–] BadNewsNobody@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Governments and corporations need people like you and me.

We are Samurai. The Keyboard Cowboys.

And all those other people who have no idea what's going on are the cattle...

Moooo.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 months ago

Uhh excuse me, Mr. The Plague?

[–] EfficientEffigy@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

One of the very few movies from 1995 that still holds

[–] AZX3RIC@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Shitting their pants over a 28.8 kbps modem, floppy disks, and roller blades.

Look, I love this movie, but, holds up? Come on, man, you're old.

[–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 0 points 8 months ago

Movies aren't just set at "current moment I'm watching the movie". Something can hold up while still being set in the past. People did, at that time, shit their pants over all those things.

[–] Glitterbomb@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

The US government will still use the same 1986 law they used in the beginning of the 1995 movie Hackers to throw the book at you in 2025 for doing anything online they don't want you to.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_Fraud_and_Abuse_Act

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 0 points 8 months ago

It was so out of touch then that it hasn't gone out of date

[–] teft@piefed.social 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Uh, Mr. The Plague, uh, something weird's happening on the fediverse.

[–] ClathrateG@hexbear.net 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip 0 points 8 months ago

What is it, you hapless techno weenie

[–] CMDR_Horn@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ain't shit compared to crowdsrike

[–] DarkSurferZA@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

Dammit, I wanted to make that reference!

[–] user_name@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

Hack the planet!

[–] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 0 points 8 months ago (3 children)

(sigh) WHY is my only copy of this movie on a VHS tape buried deep in the closet?

And I don't even have a working VCR at hand.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›