this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2026
313 points (98.8% liked)

Fuck AI

7746 readers
1232 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Great timing and phrasing. "Be slow about slop development ooor.. Burn everyone and everything!"

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 94 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Clear answer for me - everything else wins over pointless "AI"

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 19 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Making collages out of human excrement wins over pointless "AI" for me.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Anything that makes rich people look stupid and blow money is good, yes.

[–] isles@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So you're proAI or what? 😉

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

...

...

...

Shit. You got me with that.

But I'm more pro-OceanGate.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

I'm pretty sure "squish" is the exact opposite of "blow"

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 7 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Does not and will never exist, so it isn't "something" .

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Well, thought more of the better stuff like nature, not Musk's brainfarts

[–] justsomeguy@lemmy.world 81 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 month ago

Don't threaten me with a good time.

[–] NM_Gringo@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Right? Talk about not being able to read the room.

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago

Hmmmmm lower electric bills for our countries electorate OR giant buildings they hate that pollute their water, give them ill health from noise pollution, and take their jobs?

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Damn I don't know, let me ask chatgpt.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

They said they'd love me more if I syntax error input new token so that's what I live by

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 month ago

I mean, we must choose. Just not in favor of slopcenters burning through resources for highly dubious advantages.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 26 points 1 month ago

I'd pay good money to rid the world of AI

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 month ago (12 children)

Not true at all. AI can and should be running on renewables alone.

[–] kraxla@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago

Yes, Euria and many others in Europa are already doing it.

https://euria.infomaniak.com/

The Problem is not AI but how Datacenters are used in USA.

[–] SalmonTractor@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago

And closed-loop cooling. But then it will still emit heat, which should be captured in a downstream process.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 15 points 1 month ago

I mean that's an easy choice, but also no fucking way. Rich pricks would pay for data centers even if they had to run them exclusively off renewables. This is a bluff.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 15 points 1 month ago

Cool, fuck off then.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 14 points 1 month ago

Lol easy choice

[–] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

What I find interesting is that a lot of these changes which are attributed to the purportedly "inevitable" changes associated with AI (or partly with its not-adoption), are real consequences of climate change.

  • loss of employment? Check.
  • profound change to living conditions? Check.
  • loss of labour productivity - including knowledge work? Check.
  • threathening the stability of the world-wide financial system? Check.
  • increasing likelihood of war? Check.
  • threathening even the continuity of human civilization? Check.
  • threathening the capability to compete on national scales if the change is not reponded to swiftly by governments? Check.
  • Correlated with obscene amounts of wealth concentration, impoverishing the huge majority of people, and disintegrating societies? Check.

It's as if AI is used as a distraction. Like the "accusation in a mirror" pattern.

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

How else do you think they will get a one world government? Cause the problems, depopulate the “undesirables”, cause conflict, and offer a solution to fix what you have created. Not a hard concept. The only way people will accept a totalitarian techno-fascist one world government is with an overwhelming catastrophe.

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago

So no AI then, eh! Eh?

[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 9 points 1 month ago

politico

ewww

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago

They just say it. 🫴

[–] remon@ani.social 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

No we don't. I'm pretty sure we'll be able to miss all the climate goals even if we ban data centres.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Most probably. But not by such a high margin. The energy consumption of datacenters is completely insane.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I just wish we could convince tptb into building that much grid capacity in renewables. For the citizenry. Not for buisness.

I mean I'm aware of a few projects, but like nothing on datacenter scale

[–] kraxla@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago

Its not completely Insane for Datacenters or Supercomputers in Europa. Also our Supercomputers are always first in Green500, unlike USAs!

[–] ennof@feddit.org 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Yeah we can have a global climate disaster without AI too dudes. We have options [jazz hands emoji dot png]

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

And if it's not AI it's the next hype. We need to make a stand.

[–] kraxla@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I want newer, cleaner, superior technology made with the help of AI to lessen, stop or even reverse Climate Change.

Also my Room is to damn hot! XD

[–] dr_robotBones@reddthat.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How is a token predictor that can only regurgitate old ideas going to invent something new?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Damage@feddit.it 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I've started playing around with ollama on my PC. The models I've tried so far are hardly comparable to Claude but also aren't completely useless. If performance keeps improving, and hardware does as well, why rush it? We could accomplish similar results while spending a fractions of what others are spending.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The work I need AI to do is not on my computer. It's my dishes.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hey, so, I have great news for you about washing dishes...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›