We eating the onion?
this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2026
278 points (93.7% liked)
News
37093 readers
2429 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
onions are quite tasty when cooked this well
Not to nitpick, but the article says Andrew Callaghan is a conservative media personality. IMO he’s far from conservative. I’d appreciate other’s thoughts on this.
His interview series with Hunter is pretty eye opening. Worth a watch.
Also, yes, I would pay to watch Hunter, a former crack addict, absolutely embarrass the silver spoon twins.
Most of his journalism I would say is left leaning, but he typically avoids the hardline leftist stances. I would assume he gets labelled as conservative due to his willingness to interview pretty much anyone on any side. I would say he’s independent, While you could argue he’s centrist or left leaning, I think it’s safe to say he is not conservative.
Not sure. I do know that he's a sex pest though (at the very least)
I'm generally not an apologist but brother he was like 19 without a fully cooked noodle, has spotlighted what he did wrong, full out publically apologized, and stopped production to (supposedly) work on himself.
Is there no such thing as forgiveness? What else should he do? Would you like him to give you, personally, a literal pound of his flesh?
Pedophiles get the rope. Rapers should be desexed and shunned. Sex pests though? Fucking awful behaviour but the ongoing reaction is unreal.
Oh shit he took some time off, guys. To work on himself.
Have statements like that ever not been bullshit?
And I'm sorry, but didn't he assault multiple women who were too drunk to consent? I was playing it safe when I said "sex pest" because I hadn't remembered the exact claims. But I just looked into it again, and yeah fuck that dude.
Yeah, I've read the allegations as well, and you know what it sounds like to me? A 19 year old who grew up with shitty American sex-ed believing that a "soft no" is a real thing.
Again, not trying to downplay this, it's shitty behaviour, but what would you like to see happen?
From what I understand he acknowledged his accusers, denied the one (unnamed accuser) accusation of rape, apologized, and no charges have been filed. So.... what do?
You know what, why the fuck not
people like Trump's sons/epstein class im general would exist far less often if they got their ass beat in achool atleast once growing up, imo
gotta learn actions have consequences early on
I have said more than once that international conflict needs to be resolved by more head of state on head of state boxing matches instead of ridiculous bombing campaigns that mostly kill civilians who, in my experience as one myself, have a near universal opinion of "basically all war is stupid"
I nominate Baron as the Trump champion.
Any time we want to argue against Trump policies we just have to beat the tar out of him to prove our worth.
Maybe if that was a requirement, we'd start getting more presidents like Teddy Roosevelt
Sounds like another step in our descent into President Camacho territory.
Wasnt that the standard back in medieval times that you fenced it out?
And yet another reason my wife should be supreme overlord of the world, I see
international conflict needs the 'leader' on the front lines.. you want to murder other humans for whatever gain, you pull the trigger
You got to give Hunter Biden this, he is funny.
Pretty sure he is trolling the UFC at the whitehouse idea.
They better drug test both sides beforehand and if they aren't blitzed out of their minds on coke or crack it's an instant DQ.
on coke or crack it's an instant DQ
Drug test wise those are 100% the same btw. Don't mind me I'm just pedantic
I mean, crack is highly concentrated coke, but ya got it cook it up first
Crack isn't "concentrated" cocaine, it's just freebase cocaine.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_base
In chemistry, a free base (freebase, free-base) is a term for the neutral form of an amine or other Lewis base. The term is used in the pharmaceutical industry in contrast to salt-based formulations like hydrochlorides. The amine is often an alkaloid, such as nicotine, morphine, and ephedrine, or derivatives thereof
Huh, TIL! I kinda thought freebase was just a form of ingestion, didn't think about chem
I enjoy your very open attitude. Cheers.
Fair enough lol. I just wanted each one to have their drug of choice.
load more comments
(1 replies)
"Conservative" Andrew Callaghan? LOL since when?
Shhh, Andrew works very hard to convince that side that they can trust him to do an interview. After the Shirley stuff, he needs something like this to be able to get back behind enemy lines.
The full quote was "conservative media commentator" which I think means he comments on conservative media, not that he is a conservative who is a media commentator. I agree it's confusing wording though.
Would've been better if they just called him a gonzo journalist as he's closer to that then a commentator.
I don't think anyone would read it to mean that. Also, he interviews just as many people on the left, but mostly people who are....just completely out there.
OP posted an authorization mouthpiece from one of the countries with the least press freedoms on the entire planet...
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/trt-world/
I didn't give them a click, but I'm sure the whole article is bullshit
Terrible source, but it seems to be real according to a better one: https://www.reuters.com/lifestyle/ready-rumble-hunter-biden-challenges-trumps-sons-cage-match-2026-04-09/
load more comments
(2 replies)
This is why we overseas say the problem is within the people, not just Trump.
This is why Trump was elected. Look at this shit.
Anyone else got a flashback of that fight between musk & zuckerberg? So long ago, can't remember who won......
I think Zuckerberg practices MMA and Musk mostly practices manbitching on the internet
And drug abuse
I think they are all practicing that
So long ago, can't remember who won......
Pr people
tells conservative social media commentator Andrew Callaghan
What fucking idiot thinks Channel 5 is right wing?!
Answer:
The mouthpiece for a fascist authorarian apparently...
In 2024, Reporters Without Borders ranked Turkey 158th in the world for press freedom among 180 countries. According to Reporters Without Borders, “The witch hunt waged by President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s government against its media critics has come to a head since an abortive coup in July 2016. A state of emergency has allowed the authorities to eliminate dozens of media outlets with the stroke of a pen, reducing pluralism to a handful of low-circulated and targeted publications.”
In review, when reporting non-Turkey-related news, TRT World reports with minimally loaded language and utilizes credible sources such as Vox, Moscow Times, NY Times, Washington Post, Tass and republishes credible news agencies such as Reuters.
TRT World reflects a pro-government tone in its national coverage, as seen through its analysis of the upcoming elections. Most national coverage heavily sided with the ruling party and less coverage of the main opposition party candidate. Further, the UK’s Spectator states TRT World is “President Erdogan’s mouthpiece to woo the west.” In short, this is a pro-government propaganda source.
Although TRT World presents relatively low biased coverage of USA news, such as “Trump cancels summit with Kim; North Korea still wants talks,” they source through large blocks of quotes without providing any links to the sources.
Will they be allowing timeouts for more cocaine?
this... is not helping.
I have met Hunter Biden. I will take that bet.
I would pay to see that! but yeah, no way they'd actually want to do that fight - they'll dodge it like they dodge responsibility, drafts and intellect.
Can I take hunter’s place to beat the shit out of trump’s sons?
This must be a simulation.
Yes, probably a simulation to test something stupid.
"What do you mean we're both not allowed to have someone else fight for us? That's life, that's how it works no? Someone else does everything for me and I get the results! Why is this different!? Communist!!!"
view more: next ›