this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2026
1078 points (98.8% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

40724 readers
3939 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 143 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Having 4 babies in 1 year in the 1800s had to be quite the achievement

[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 99 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Not impossible though. Two in January, two in November.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 76 points 3 months ago (7 children)

Or just the four of them together in one go I guess.

[–] homes@piefed.world 59 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Regardless of which way it happened, I’d be crying a lot, especially if it happened in the 1800s.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

In the 1800s you'd be counting yourself lucky you survived it.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Food was much cheaper and you were allowed to put them to work right away.

Plus most of them died before five anyways.

[–] homes@piefed.world 16 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Ah, yes, the 1800s… When it was perfectly legal to put newborn babies to work in the coal-mining sweat shops of South London

Very Tiny Tim: Please, Sir, may I have some WHAAAAA! WHAAAA! WHAAAAA!

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 7 points 3 months ago

Kids as young as 4 years old would be put to work, so it's not that far off really.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Not just legal but encouraged.

[–] homes@piefed.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Encouraged by all the starvation, poverty, and pestilence

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They yearn for the mines after all

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Or triplets in January and one in November, or one in January and triplets in November (but it was definitely these two months). She's crazy – capable of anything.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Or 6 at once but 2 didn't make it

[–] pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 months ago

Or octuplets born on new year's eve so half were in one year and half were in the next.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Irish quadruplets?

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Never said they came to term

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

I've never met anyone who had a miscarriage and still described the experience as having a baby in this way.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 7 points 3 months ago (3 children)

How many people from the 1800's do you know

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 7 points 3 months ago

Some women from the 1800s would have described having a miscarriage as a blessing, not a baby.

https://slate.com/human-interest/2018/11/miscarriage-19th-century-women-loss-book.html

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 months ago

Personally, or by reputation?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ChexMax@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I know two people who had full term still born babies. They both absolutely refer to them as babies and as having given birth. I'm only 6 months pregnant and if I lost the pregnancy at this point I would say I lost my son. He's very real and alive to me, he moves and touches me many times an hour, already keeps me up every night. He's a real dude in there.

That said, I've had two miscarriages and consider those lost pregnancies, not lost children. I've seen people online say things like "mother of 4, 2 in heaven" though.

Having something die inside you can fuck you up forever.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EyIchFragDochNur@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Only if they survive until birth.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 63 points 3 months ago (1 children)

... fortunately for you, I have a treatment that won't cost much. No, you can't watch. Also, there's a discount if you pay for a full year in advance.

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 18 points 3 months ago

Modern day vibrators are a silver lining to this time period lol

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 46 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I'm not a fan of this use of "whom".

[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 54 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

Exactly the reason why, indeed.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Slightly smarter dumb-dumbs get corrected a lot so they just always use the "more proper" sounding one while still not actually understanding the rule

[–] Janx@piefed.social 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It's like YouTubers who say "thee" because they think it's a more formal version of "the". Drives me crazy...

[–] basxto@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 months ago

That’s rage bait, right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Janx@piefed.social 7 points 3 months ago

But it does rhyme with "womb", if you're composing slam poetry.

[–] abbiistabbii@piefed.blahaj.zone 43 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You joke, but I'm currently studying the history of my area's mental health system and people believed giving birth and lactating made women insane.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They were describing post partum symptoms most likely. Pretty rough stuff for some people. Some people can get ptsd from it.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Yup. And what's worse, you can temporarily alleviate the symptoms by getting pregnant. I know someone with 13 kids who, uh, self medicated that way.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago (3 children)

The solution is obviously cocaine.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] YeahIgotskills2@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

I was surprised to learn that there are many women who have never had an orgasm. And that pressure to have one has become yet another social imperative women never asked for. Why shame the woman? Should they not have agency over their own bodies? The implication that it's a failing of their partner suggests that it's beyond their control.

It feels like a very male-centric outlook to view orgasms as essential to sex. Of course, one would assume women could take matters into their own hands, so to speak, but I've been told by female friends that, for many women, it's not as simple as that, psychologically.

My own opinion is that, in our race for equality (which I support), we've often chosen to flatten gender differences rather than celebrate or acknowledge them. We've assumed that sexuality/desire/impulse/physiology is the same across genders, and that differences are down to individual mindsets rather than biological. I think it's both, but we've neglected the latter.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There was a study about womens sexual satisfaction in long term relationships and a high percentage said they were not satisfied.

Its not just about orgasms specifically I'd bet, and unfortunately a lot of men don't really think about the womans pleasure during sex, they get off and then they're done.

Of course I'm sure there's not really a way to blanket say what the problem ultimately is as it depends on the situation/people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

I myself don't view orgasms as essential to sex. At least not anymore. I am a bit saddened that my gf says she has never had an orgasm. And I don't think anyone in particular is to blame here.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Better treatment options though.

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] MTZ@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Also heroin and dildos. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡° )

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vantablack@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

it has never not been a rough time to be a woman lmao

[–] Soulg@ani.social 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No but things have certainly improved somewhat

[–] zemo@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It has improved massively, at least in the west. Saying "somewhat" is a massive underestimation and undermindes the fight of women for hundreds of years.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] happydoors@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

2026 after the “SAVE America act”

[–] jdr@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 months ago

The old "Irish quadruplets"

[–] toynbee@piefed.social 5 points 3 months ago

I'm a man, but I like it when my wife has orgasms. Often I do, too. Sometimes the two coincide and I really like that.

I suspect men of old also loved their lovers, though not universally. Hopefully the ladies came as well.

[–] daggermoon@piefed.world 4 points 3 months ago

I'll give mommy an orgasm whenever she wants

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago

Yes, but lets not discuss the fainting spells and the massage treatments that noble women received to relieve their bouts of "hysteria".

Honestly, I wonder how much of that is real versus made up for slander "Let them eat cake" was not quite ancient history in the Victorian era.

load more comments
view more: next ›