sneakypersimmon

joined 1 month ago
[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 5 points 1 hour ago

It certainly got a reaction out of you, so I think this art piece did its job here.

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 27 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It hasn’t been approved yet - the title is misleading. The US has requested Reddit appear for a grand jury hearing by April 14.

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 14 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Clearly feminism hasn’t gone far enough.

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 7 points 17 hours ago

It’s a logical fallacy to take a single person and assume an entire movement based on her views alone.

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 7 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

It's not my job to coddle you because I'm a woman.

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 11 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

Yeah your single (female) boss represents all feminists and the feminist movement.

Great detective work there.

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

But only B randomly accosts male strangers on the street, interrogating them about the sex ratio at their workplace, and chastising them if it isn’t at least 50% female, regardless of what line of work he is in.

This is your definition of a raging feminist?

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 4 points 17 hours ago

It is possible to support a cause, even emphatically, without being insufferable.

The original comment before the edit makes it clear this user has disdain for feminists that are too insufferable to his tastes.

Thus my skepticism at why he had to mention what year the tweet/artwork was from.

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 8 points 18 hours ago (5 children)

it is absolutely possible to move away from ‘raging feminist’ without moving one iota closer to ‘complicit in dehumanization’.

That's not an objectively true statement.

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

You’ve completely fabricated that motive/intent, so yeah. Do you not know what “emphatically” means? I made it very clear that ‘insufferability’ has nothing to do with the ‘loudness’ of the actions.

Women can protest their subjugation as long as they aren't insufferable about it.

Yeah, I understood your comment.

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 2 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Your entire first comment boils down to "women should protest their inequalities in quieter ways", so yeah.

Why does it matter whether it's recent or not?

 

In his closing argument, prosecutor Joel Garner said Gerhardt Konig was "obsessed" with his wife's emotional affair with a co-worker when he tried to shove her from a cliff on the Pali Puka Trail, northeast of Honolulu.

When that failed, Garner said, he tried to stab her with a syringe and bashed her head with a rock. The attack ended when two hikers came upon the scene, he said.

“The only thing that got him to stop was being caught red-handed,” Garner said.

 

Grindr will host its inaugural “White House Correspondents’ dinner Weekend Party” the night before the main event, a night that has been not-so-affectionately dubbed “Nerd Prom” over the years.

An invitation to the fete in Washington’s Georgetown neighborhood promises to “bring together policymakers, journalists, and LGBTQ community leaders as we toast the First Amendment.”

“Grindr represents a global community with real stakes in Washington. The issues being debated here — HIV funding, privacy and online safety, LGBTQ+ family rights — are daily life for our community,” Joe Hack, Grindr’s head of global government affairs, told ITK in a statement when asked about what inspired the company to join the lineup of events tied to the correspondents’ dinner.

“Nobody does connections like Grindr, and WHCD weekend is the most iconic place in the country to make them. We figured it was time to host,” Hack said.

 

A woman who lived with three life-threatening autoimmune diseases for more than a decade has returned to a near-normal life after a cell therapy reset her wayward immune system.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.today/post/50414084

The conservationist shares her ongoing struggle with 'indescribable, inescapable pain' caused by the chronic disease

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.today/post/50361274

Ben Sasse has been called out for his anti-LGBTQ+ comments and racism in the past.

 

A woman who claims Bill Cosby drugged and raped her in 1972 won a $19.25 million jury award on Monday, decades after first stepping forward as Jane Doe Number 8 in the 2005 lawsuit filed by former Temple University athletics director Andrea Constand against the disgraced comedian.

Jurors found Cosby liable for the sexual assault of an intoxicated woman as well as sexual battery. They awarded plaintiff Donna Motsinger $17.5 million for past mental suffering and $1.75 million for future suffering. In another major finding, they determined Cosby acted with “malice, oppression, or fraud,” opening the door to punitive damages to be decided in a second phase of the trial.

In her testimony and court filings, Motsinger, 84, claimed Cosby befriended her while she was working as a waitress at a popular restaurant in Sausalito, California, called The Trident. She said Cosby later invited her to the recording of his standup act Inside the Mind of Bill Cosby at the Circle Star Theater in nearby San Carlos. She alleged Cosby gave her wine that made her feel sick and then gave her two round white pills she thought were aspirin.

“Next thing she knew, she was going in and out of consciousness,” Motsinger’s lawsuit said. “The last thing Ms. Motsinger recalls were flashes of light. She woke up in her house. with all her clothes off, except her underwear on – no top, no bra, and no pants. She knew she had been drugged and raped by Bill Cosby.”

 

The Heritage Foundation’s latest document, “Saving America by Saving the Family: A Foundation for the Next 250 Years,” was published in January, and its purported goal is to reverse the country’s declining birthrate.

See, if you can’t physically force women to have more babies, which is what abortion restrictions aim to do, you design government policies that pressure women into having more babies.

You cut off opportunities outside the home, you make the public sphere hostile to women’s independence and you create a system where the only viable path left for a woman is dependence on a man for survival. In other words, you drag the country back to a time when women had fewer choices.

 

A 31-year-old Georgia woman has been charged with murder by police who say she took pills to induce an illegal abortion.

If state prosecutors decide to move forward with the murder charge brought by local police against Alexia Moore, her case would be one of the first instances of a woman being charged for terminating a pregnancy in Georgia since it passed a 2019 law banning most abortions.

The arrest warrant charging Moore with murder uses language that echoes the law, saying police determined that Moore had been pregnant beyond six weeks “based on the medical staff’s knowledge that the baby had a beating heart and was struggling to breathe”.

“No one should be criminalized for having an abortion,” Dana Sussman, senior vice-president of the advocacy group Pregnancy Justice said in a statement, calling Moore’s case “an unprecedented murder charge for an alleged abortion”.

view more: next ›