this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2026
479 points (98.8% liked)

pics

28192 readers
1086 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CalmChaos72@lemmy.world 66 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] juliorapido@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 2 months ago

First thing i thought!

Dense industrial, light residential… a lot is there!

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Except that one bridge to connect industrial and residential seems a major bottleneck.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 months ago (1 children)

At the top you can see the disused Alameda Naval Air Base runway, which is where the MythBusters filmed a lot of their antics.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Also, the Matrix Reloaded freeway loop.

Now it's the largest parking lot in the Bay.

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Is this tilt shifted? Looks unreal?

[–] egrets@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

It's Maxar satellite imagery with a high off-nadir angle. European Space Imaging use it as an example in this article about ONA.

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Very cool. Learned something new today. Thank you.

[–] tomatolung@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Really useful article. Rare to read something that actually does a decent job explaining the background from someplace wanting to sell you something.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago

Thanks for the page. Was very interesting to read!

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 months ago

I looked it up on google earth and the perspective is very distorted. The shot is probably 8 times as long as it is wide

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

The photo must be around 8 years old.

Fun fact: on the top left corner is a partial segment of the old Bay Bridge that was damaged during the Loma Prieta 1989 earthquake. They built a whole new span (the white section next to it). To get rid of the old concrete underwater pylons, they blew them all up underwater. Here's a video of the implosion of the last two:

https://blog.bayareametro.gov/posts/final-implosion-old-bay-bridge

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago (3 children)
[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago

Fog machine operators were on strike.

[–] NannerBanner@literature.cafe 8 points 2 months ago

Had the exact same thought. My visit to san fran was hilarious, because looking across the bay, you could see the sunshine on the north side, while the south was blanketed in light mist and fog. Our brief visit to the north side to see the muir woods was the exact opposite: sitting in sunshine while looking at a dreary, shrouded place across the water.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

You mean Karl?

[–] hobovision@mander.xyz 13 points 2 months ago

This perspective is extra trippy because the port of Oakland and Naval Air Station Alameda are both so incomprehensibly huge on a human scale. You have an awareness and feeling for how big a city and skyscrapers are, so to see them in this perspective get made to look so small and so close to these expanses of concrete is mind bending.

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Does anyone know what the small half complete bridge on the left is?

[–] CelloMike@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think it's the original eastern span, midway through being demolished after the present one was finished in 2013

[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Indeed, this photos pretty old. Haven't seen the bay that blue in a looooooong time. It's more of a dirty brown all the time now

[–] Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

That would be Yerba Buena/Treasure Island. It has a crazy history.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This prob looked really pretty before all the concrete.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Meh, it was mostly just sand dunes, at least for San Francisco. There's probably more trees there now then before it was developed. Also San Francisco probably has the most natural area surrounding it then any other major city in the US, since most of the area around it is either mountains or water which you can't build on, that's also why it's so dense.

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh thank god they build some skyscrapers then.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Unironnically yes, conservation wise skyscrapers are the best way for people to live. Squeezing people onto the smallest footprint possible per person is the best way to keep spaces natural, besides killing large chunks of the human population...

[–] PetteriSkaffari@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Plus doing away with cattle. (Yeah, c'mon.)

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago
[–] jason@discuss.online 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I think that little island there is Alcatraz.

[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Pff.. I can swim that!

[–] iMastari@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

You are correct.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

I first thought this pic was showing flooding or higher water levels. Nice overview shot.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago

What ever happened to predictability?

[–] king_comrade@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Is this from Google maps or smth?

[–] egrets@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

It's satellite imagery, yes, but from an oblique (high off-nadir) angle. The imagery is from DigitalGlobe, who are now Maxar.

[–] Baguette@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago

San fran is great, some of the prettiest coastline and amazing food

I can't remember the last time I was there when it was sunny though

[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

With a telephoto lens no less. Must have been really far away with a long lens to get it to look so flat.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Odd perspective. What kind of lens was this taken with.

[–] BobDole4Prez@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Not sure about lens but this looks like a tilt shift photo

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I don't think it's tilt shifted because it doesn't have the edge blur, I think it's just a really big altitude photo taken with a zoom lens and colour saturated to death

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Kinda looks like that, but it’s missing the DoF.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Pretty city for tourists visiting the tourist areas.

A different story if trying to live in it. I used to like the idea of living and working there, until I saw the costs of living.