SubArcticTundra

joined 3 years ago
[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

In that case it is the technological developments whose pace needs to be dampened, because it is those that pose the danger.

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

If we define 'governor' as a system whose task it is to regulate sth to keep it at a constant level, a good successful existing example would be central banks. They regulate money supply in order to keep inflation at a constant, prescribed, level.

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 hours ago

Good catch, fixed

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Yep, the international law that such a mechanism would require would inevitably be broken by the usual suspects. We're just not capable enough of organizing ourselves as a species.

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Balls any smaller just wouldn't do justice to such a powerful machine

 

This would stop the currently exponential pace of growth from outpacing what society, and regulation, can adapt to. Thus avoiding the inevitable crash that will happen when we lose control of the exponentially accelerating train of technology, and it flies off the rails.

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 hours ago

That's it, I'm switching to Anarchy Chess.

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 hours ago
[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 hours ago

Now that's a YouTube sketch I'd watch

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 8 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

ist unmessbar

Nicht mit dieser Einstellung

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Hast du etwa keine Notfall-Marmelade für gerade diesen Fall?

6
Democracy Bonds (www.zocalopublicsquare.org)
 

Assume everything else, like the quality of the content, would stay the same as now

This would tell us if social media content behaves like & should be treated as a commodity (just like magazines & DVDs), or something completely different like waste or like a public good

 

For me there's two separate participants, a 'talker' and a 'listener'. My mind identifies more with the talker, because that's the one that has agency. Since there are two participants, both of which are me, I talk in 1st person plural ('we've got to do ...', 'we thought about this earlier'). I stopped being afraid of being alone after I started having an internal dialogue around the age of 11, since having a second participant in the conversation meant I was always in company.

Edit: Wow, looks like there's a lot more diversity in this than I was expecting

 

Wikipedia says

Marbury is regarded as the single most important decision in American constitutional law. It established that the U.S. Constitution is actually law, not merely a statement of political principles and ideals.

221
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
 
 
view more: next ›