this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2026
424 points (99.8% liked)

News

37646 readers
1858 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 123 points 3 months ago (3 children)
[–] scottmeme@sh.itjust.works 88 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 39 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes, he fails the good moral character requirement miserably and definitely falls under: "migrants who undermine domestic tranquility".

[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He was also an undocumented immigrant at one point, from overstaying his college visa IIRC.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 3 months ago

both him and kimball.

[–] crozilla@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago (3 children)
[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 months ago

The beard you mean.

[–] X@piefed.world 6 points 3 months ago

Of course! As if that even needed to be asked.

[–] psoul@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Deport the sofa back to Sweden!

[–] Humanius@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

As if Trump actually cares about Melania

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 78 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Notice the terminology. Working to expand effort means that they are going ahead with that plan. This is not a drill.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It’s been not-a-drill since November 2024.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 months ago

True, I was just pointing out that this isn't just the republicans saying they're going to do something. That usually doesn't mean anything except that they're testing the waters.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 42 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you have some citizens with real citizenship and other citizens with provisional, revocable citizenship, then you have created a system, both in theory and in practice, with first-class and second-class citizens.

Yet I have a feeling those of us who really were born here are never going to have a citizenship advantage over the likes of Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, Patrick Soon-Shiong, and so on.

[–] acchariya@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The division already exists in law, look up statutory citizenship vs constitutional citizenship

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 33 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

What else did you think they were building all those massive concentration camps for?

[–] regedit@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago

Parties for Elon and friends?

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

It's a short putt from there to removing citizenship from anyone, for any reason.

[–] ClownStatue@piefed.social 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Most foreign born Americans. I have a feeling there's already a list of people who can stay. A short one. Populated by billionaire conservatives and eastern European former models.

[–] leopardpuncher@feddit.dk 2 points 3 months ago

Don't forget about future models — that crowd likes 'em young, I hear 🫤

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 3 months ago

And his 4 anchor babies.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There are growing concerns that the DHS effort is more about creating fear and less about successfully stripping citizenship. Even if Americans swept up in investigations aren’t prosecuted or convicted, the process takes a financial and emotional toll; they’d have to hire lawyers and produce documents.

Margy O’Herron, a senior fellow in the liberty and national security program at the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University Law School, said the mere threat of denaturalization creates real terror.

“Citizens are afraid that if they do or say something the government doesn’t like — even if those things are lawful and protected by the Constitution — they will be a target,” she said.

Sounds likely to me.

[–] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Yep, it would only be applied selectively. They spun this up for Mamdani and the MAGA chuds don't think it'll happen to their mail order brides, so they're all fine with it.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

If they go through with it, flood their tip line with calls about Melania and Elon.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Let me guess, Barack Obama gets deported because he's obviously from Kenya

Sigh

[–] ClownStatue@piefed.social 7 points 3 months ago

Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if they tried.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Obama and other blue oligarch servants are perfectly safe. They're not the ones who are actually being murdered and dissapeared under this admin.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I have a very close friend from Venezuela, who became a naturalized citizen in December 2924, after Trump's election, but before his inauguration.

She tells me she's not concerned, because she's a citizen, but they don't even respect Birthright Citizenship, they certainly aren't going to respect any citizenship that was conferred under a Democratic administration, especially Obama's or Biden's.

She's a genuinely good person, and America is a better place with her in it, but MAGA wouldn't agree. I'm really worried about her.

[–] Bassman1805@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

God fucking damn it, you're telling me he's getting cryogenically process and is coming back in 900 years to terrorize my Great^30 Grandchildren?

[–] Iamcanadian@piefed.ca 9 points 3 months ago

Does that include his wife?

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 months ago

Sooooo, we're going to start withthe currently arguably most famous one then, Melania?

[–] deliciEsteva@piefed.world 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Take it, please. I've been looking for a "get out of citizenship free" card. This would be a dream come true. I'd finally have a free slot to get dual citizenship somewhere nice. Maybe even somewhere with less fascist pedos in charge.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 14 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Being stateless tends not to work out so well. Other countries don't suddenly decide to offer citizenship to those in need.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Straight out of the gestapo playbook.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

They are also going after foreign-born adoptions by US citizens.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

isn't most of this kids of diplomats?

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

And ex-pats which are trending younger due to people trying to escape American fascism.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mohamed@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

It baffles me that it is even possible to summarily strip citizenship like that.

Like, it would be a lot more reasonable if people born on US soil, only in the future, no longer get citizenship.

But how can it be legal to remove citizenship by redefining the law, and then retroactively stripping people of it that no longer fit the definition? Like, isn't this the same as making a law in 2026 banning smoking, and then going back and jailing anyone who has ever smoked?

Germans did that.

[–] abbiistabbii@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 months ago

Donald Trump's mother was an immigrant who's first language was Scots Gaelic. 

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Elon first!!!

[–] jcorvera@quokk.au 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Does this include children of Servicemembers who were born off-base?

[–] Tinks@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Based on the article it appears they're targeting naturalized citizens, but as someone who was born in Germany because my dad was in the Army, this is still concerning. Here I was just thinking I only had to fear for my permanent resident husband... I really hate this timeline.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dunestorm@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Pure fascism, get this evil orange motherfucker in prison!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›