this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Murdered by Words

2462 readers
2 users here now

Responses that completely destroy the original argument in a way that leaves little to no room for reply - a targeted, well-placed response to another person, organization, or group of people.

The following things are not grounds for murder:

Rules:

  1. Be civil and remember the human. No name calling or insults. Swearing in general is fine, but not to insult someone else.
  2. Discussion is encouraged but arguments are not. Don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguments sake.
  3. No bigotry of any kind.
  4. Censor the person info of anyone not in the public eye.
  5. If you break the rules you’ll get one warning before you’re banned.
  6. Enjoy the community in the light hearted way it’s intended.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is an example of more dollars than sense. They look terrible and paid good money for the privilege.

[–] Monzcarro@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago

More pounds than sense.

I'm fairly certain that's New Street All Bar One in Birmingham. This is typical attire for tossers going out day drinking in Brum.

Also, these guys just look British. The short guy couldn't look more aggressively British if he was wearing the Union Jack and invading countries for their tea.

Also, I'm not sure these clothes cost too many pounds - lots of polyester there. No shade - I don't buy expensive clothes myself either.

[–] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Guy in the beige shirt accidentally came out wearing his little brother's face.

[–] Kernal64@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

Hahaha this response deserves its own post in this community. 🤣

[–] Okokimup@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Alex Horne got jacked.

[–] Naja_Kaouthia@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

That second guy is one fart away from a public nudity charge.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

You can almost tell their religion be a their pants are so tight

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Their arms are as big as their thigh. How can you even do that?

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Skipping leg day

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago
[–] pseudo@jlai.lu 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It means 'loser' It comes from the word 'jobber' who is a type of pro wrestler who's role is to lose and make the other guy look strong going in to more meaningful matches. (Synonyms: jabroni, enhancement talent, job guy, carpenter, fall guy) Often these are young wrestlers cutting their teeth in the business. But there are some wrestlers who specialize in the role. Note: some wrestlers (jobbers) find the word 'jobber' to be insulating, insinuating they are in the role due to lack of talent. The term enhancement talent is considered more respectful.

[–] pseudo@jlai.lu 0 points 1 year ago

Thank you. TIL.

One of today's lucky 10000! Search YouTube for jabroni always sunny for the source of the term being used outside wrestling

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 0 points 1 year ago

Maybe I'm old-fashioned, but I don't think you should subject everyone in public to having to see the entire shape of your cock and balls in pants that are so tight you can't even walk in them.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 0 points 1 year ago

I can't stand tight clothes especially shirts. There are very few things more annoying and uncomfortable than a shirt that desperately wants to burrow into your armpit.

As for the pants I can't say I'd enjoy needing a changing partner:

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago
[–] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They've all got chicken legs

[–] GoodLuckToFriends@lemmy.today 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Second from left and third from right both have pretty muscular legs. The edges have good, proportional legs.

[–] NotJohnSmith@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Second from left is the short guy, third from right is the same short guy.

I'm not disagreeing with you BTW, it's just the same person :)

[–] GoodLuckToFriends@lemmy.today 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] NotJohnSmith@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago

Argggg, sorry, only just woken up and a little dense at the best of times. Carry on :)

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Left guy is fine, I think. Proportional and his clothes fit. The ripped knees are questionable but w/e if he wants to tell us he's on his knees all day I won't judge.

[–] slouching_employer@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago

Give it about ten years and the popular style will pendulum back to fitted/tight clothing.

Just like it was before the current baggy trend and after the previous baggy trend, which was preceded by another tight trend, which was preceded by another baggy trend, and so on and so on

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Showing off those sexy ankles would've gotten them in quite the pickle back in the late 1800s.

[–] Aganim@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Men, what's preventing you to dress like this?

The fact that my girlfriend would die from laughter if I did.

[–] shirro@aussie.zone 0 points 1 year ago

Testicles descent outside the body for good biological reasons.

[–] BreadAndThread@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

They're all wearing leggings of assorted fabrics and styles.

I've managed to buy clothes since I left the eighth grade.

[–] Trilobyte@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago

They almost look shrink wrapped

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Because I'm not into CBT.

[–] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago

Guy on the left looks good to me honestly. The other three take it too far for my tastes but Lefty's hot

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I am not dressing for you. I am dressing for my own comfort and to satisfy legal requirements.

[–] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago

"What's preventing you from dressing like this?"

My moderate self esteem.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

If you consider round a shape I’d totally wear that

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago

Junk too big, I'm too fat, and it's a douchy style when taken to the extreme of the photo. Wearing well fit clothes is good, but this is something else.

I regularly have trouble finding pants where the crotch doesn't crush things or make it look like I'm smuggling sausage, the waist is wide enough, and the legs don't look like they're parachutes. Usually settle for two of the three.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

The ability to move without squeaking.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the pants look like they'll rip any second

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 year ago

Yeah, how do they expect to sit.

[–] baggins@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago

Because I'm 68 years old.

[–] EySkibidiBabBab@feddit.dk 0 points 1 year ago
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

What's preventing me? For one, actually having taste in clothing.

[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

My nuts would never forgive me

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Short socks make me feel gross

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 0 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I don't like the texture difference when both my bare and clothed feed touch the shoe.

[–] discreetelite@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago

The one lad has gone baggy what is he hiding

load more comments
view more: next ›