Trump is the real new CEO of Apple - Ternus is just a figurehead
Technology
News community around technology, social media platforms, information technology and governmental policy surrounding it.
What doesn't fit here?
The core of the story has to be technology focused.
- If article mentions "AI" in a sentence and then talks about business economics that doesn't make it tech news.
- Gaming is too many layers removed from technology. There are many dedicated communities that are a better fit for it.
- Transporation is too many layers removed from technology. EVs while use many cool technologies have many dedicated communities that are a better fit for it.
- Entertainment is too many layers removed from technology. While sometimes it can fit here, business or cultural aspects of it are a better fit for dedicated communities.
- Cybersecurity. While it heavily focuses on technology, most of the time it's too technical for most people who are not already invested in it. Should be posted in a dedicated communities unless it has broader connection to other tech areas.
Post guidelines
Title format
Post title should mirror the news source title. If you don't like the title of article, look for an alternative source instead of editorializing it.
URL format
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title. Opinion articles refer to articles that their publisher doesn't explictly endorse.
Country prefix
Country prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) if the news is from a local publisher who doesn't clearly mention the country.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
Pretty sure a lot of of these Apple employees own stock in the company. Perhaps they should remember to cast their vote when it comes time for board elections.
I can guarantee they do. They give stock options to every employee after a few years, including retail employees.
Unfortunately, as you can imagine, it is so little stock that it is effectively meaningless as far as having any sway over the direction of the company.
A protest vote is never meaningless. Sure, they probably don’t own enough stock to kick these people out — but that rising number on the vote tally sends an interesting message.
There was a time when smart people at Apple went off to form new ventures and bring talent with them — companies like Nest and General Magic for example. You don’t see much of that anymore. I do wonder if missteps like this will inspire employees to do this sort of thing again.
Yeah, it sends the message "We should give them fewer stocks and options."
Wouldn't it be a more interesting message for them to all sell their stock at the same time?
Options, or grants?
Probably grants, and even when exercised they almost certainly don't come with voting rights.
No, RSUs are just regular stocks once they vest.
I'm willing to bet they aren't that mad.
Hi Apple! If you don't want Trump to control the company, move to Europe!
Cook will remain at Apple as the executive chairman of the company's board of directors. In this new role, Apple said Cook will assist with "certain aspects" of the company, including "engaging with policymakers around the world."
https://www.macrumors.com/2026/08/31/tim-cook-steps-down-as-apple-ceo-tomorrow/
I mean, they can't be that surprised, when they literally announced Tim Cook was stepping down as CEO to become Trump's royal cock-gobbler 🤷♂️
Isn't the board of directors basically a group of people who tell the CEO what to do?
When power is consolidated, corruption is easy.
If we enforced antitrust laws and broke Apple and Google into a dozen companies each, then a lot more would have to cave for the same result.
When we don't enforce anti-trust laws, the biggest will always suck up to whoever is in office to further de-regulate and approve mergers they shouldn't.
But it's an insanely easy fix, and were only 2.5 years away from it if everything shakes out
This is why I have already deeted my Maps app and downloaded the MapQuest one. It's quite nice, actually.
Of the alternatives I've tried (mapquest, openstreetmaps, and organic maps) mapquest is my favourite because its got features like home and work and additional destinations you can save. It also have more of the amenities easily searchable.
Organic maps is very no nonsense and works as a GPS router. And osm is more of a mapping tool than a navigation partner.
They're all good though
But you already bought the iPhone...
Yes I did.. years ago. I also have a 2022 Moto 5G which I use as a glorified iPod Touch. Love that it's got a big SD card in it. Lotsa room. Lotsa music. Your point is?
Let's be real, Apple makes the money on the App Store, not there phone itself.
Well... only if you buy apps.
Still, Apple's leadership and most of its rank-and-file are described as "resigned" to these kinds of concessions under Trump's second term, understanding "that Trump will f--- with the company if the company doesn't do what he wants," the person said.
Not exactly courageous leadership.
Apple's leadership and most of its rank-and-file are described as "resigned" to these kinds of concessions under Trump's second term
MAGA sympathizers, disgusting.
An "internal revolt" where everybody keeps doing their jobs and nothing changes. The execs weren't the ones to actually make the change in maps.
I still have to use Macs for work but I'm excited to check out what else is out there when the time comes to upgrade my personal devices.
What did they expect? The Trump ass kissing has been ongoing but they still work there.