this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2026
397 points (97.8% liked)

Greentext

8758 readers
689 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 108 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

>be me
>be not gay
>having sex with my loving husband of 15 years
>I identify as a cis male
>our penises touch when I slip out of his asshole on a slow thrust
>we lock eyes
>I say no homo
>he doesn’t reciprocate
>ejaculates as he continues silently staring into my eyes
>I pull out and exhaustedly crawl to the bathroom to think things through and remove a meter of silicon
>can feel his eyes scanning me without even turning around

Bros, I don’t know what to do. Should I tell our kids?

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 27 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

Remove a meter of silicon?

[–] Limonene@lemmy.world 17 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

silicon_crystal_boule.jpeg

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 16 points 4 weeks ago

Exaggerated butt stuff

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 90 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Or, hear me out, sometimes dudes are bi.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

What are people's opinion on the downlow thing, otherwise straight men that just have furtive sex with other men, but never a relationship? Denial? Indiscriminate horniness?

[–] jaycifer@lemmy.world 37 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)
[–] PartyAt15thAndSummit@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

“heteroromantic bisexual” can also refer to someone who is sexually attracted to any gender (male, female, non-binary, agender, genderqueer)

Wouldn't that be "heteroromantic pansexual" then?

[–] festnt@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 weeks ago

afaik pan and bi are the same, with the difference being preference

[–] DaPorkchop_@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

depends on whether you're using the MOGAI definition of bisexual as "attracted to exactly two genders" or the LGBT definition as "attracted to more than one gender"

in practice there really isn't much distinction, i don't know a single person who identifies as bisexual and wouldn't consider fucking a non-binary person, and the main distinguishing factor between people who label themselves bisexual and those that label themselves pansexual seems to be "was this person active on tumblr or other online communities with a similar vibe at any point between 2014-ish and now".

[–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 weeks ago

Personally, I was never on tumblr. Pansexuals just have a better flag.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

all of the above.

sometimes a hole is just a hole.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago

sometimes a hole is just a hole.

I appreciate an explanation that doesn't include learning new vocabulary.

[–] Forester@pawb.social 4 points 4 weeks ago

That's called heteroromantic and bisexual

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 81 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 81 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

fake: anon has a wholesome friendship
gay: ... I'm not too sure actually, I'll need some help on this one

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 40 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

I think it's the bit where they ordered a pizza

[–] Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Might be, I have a gay friend and he once ordered a pizza so that tracks

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 weeks ago

That makes sense. I'm pretty sure there's a ton of gay porn that starts with a pizza delivery boy

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 4 weeks ago

Yeah. They probably enjoyed having hot gooey stuff on their mouth way too much

[–] aldhissla@piefed.world 65 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

Here's my biggest pet peeve (relevant to the scenario): the cancelling of bi-folk. There is a forced dichotomy of men being either hetero- or homosexual, with homoerotic choices somehow automatically negating all heteroerotic choices by framing them as perfidy (i.e. pretending to be heterosexual to pass in society).

Freddie Mercury was bi. NOT GAY. Bi. I have no issue with gays revering him. I do have issues with gays trying to deny his heteroromantic side (see Mary Austin).

Rant over.

[–] Bristlecone@lemmy.world 19 points 4 weeks ago

Least represented group of lgbt, but probably the largest. People love binary things

[–] Krejga@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I always felt that it's just homophobia. The heteroerotic choices of bisexuals are disregarded because of the lost purity of being considered 'straight'. You can have heterosexual preferences but according to heteronormative society you fit outside this group. It will take time for Bisexuality to be better understood by society and for bisexuals to fully be seen as a distinct group

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 9 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] HoopyFrood@lemmy.zip 9 points 4 weeks ago

There was no denial that Freddy Mercury engaged in sexual relationships with men, but those relationships should not delegitimize or downplay his relationships with women by insinuating that any relations with a man make him gay and only engaging with women to fit in.

[–] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 6 points 4 weeks ago

Society views bisexual men as secretly gay, and women as secretly straight.

[–] Boozilla@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

My nonexpert understanding is, few people are 100% straight or 100% gay. And it can shift over time, too.

There's so much defensive BS around what people are into / aroused by. I'm not saying everyone should share everything to everyone all the time. But I really wish folks would be less fearful about what they like.

As long as you aren't attracted to kids, corpses, or animals, I think everything else is probably OK. Even couches, if that's your thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DerEnder@lemmus.org 55 points 4 weeks ago
[–] Ekybio@lemmy.world 43 points 4 weeks ago

Guy is Homiesexual

[–] SuDmit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 39 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] antonim@lemmy.world 24 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

I already know how sunsets look, yet I can look and marvel at them on every evening.

[–] SuDmit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Yeah, absolutely. I usually get to see them once a week or rarer, so beautiful sometimes. Sadly phone camera does not capture them well enough. Still, seen them!

I've just seen same joke in the past and liked it, decided to do it here. Though I see more generalized versions of the same in the comments too. Efficiency.

Seen replies about bi-erasure and homophobia... Yeah... Not that funny now.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 35 points 4 weeks ago

Fake: Didn't say "no homo".

Gay: Didn't say "no homo".

[–] devaly@ani.social 30 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

maybe Anon is just starving for any non-animal sexual relationship

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 9 points 4 weeks ago

Humans are animals, but I get your point.

[–] Shirow@lemmy.zip 25 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Now I want pizza and yuri :3

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Varesti@lemmy.zip 17 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

What kind of pizza was it?

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 4 weeks ago
[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 17 points 4 weeks ago
[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 5 points 4 weeks ago

anaon is not gay, so pineapple.

[–] onionsinmypores@sh.itjust.works 17 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

It's really challenging when the post starts out with a declaration of not being gay, proceeds to describe activities which might potentially be gay, and then ends with a redeclaration of anon being not gay.

maybe it is fake, but is anon gay or no???

[–] LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Might be potentially gay?! Idk, a man having romantic sex with another man is pretty much the definition of gay, if you ask me. Doesn't get much gayer.

[–] onionsinmypores@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 weeks ago

But since anon already stated them being non-gay, shouldn't we judge the activities in a non-gay context?

[–] chrislowles@lemmy.zip 14 points 4 weeks ago
[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

A paradox!

This is either fake or gay, but it can not be both even though it is a green text.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Refused to believe that even green texters are that unaware. If it were just writing about the realisation about their sexuality whatever, but to end it with "I'm not homosexual" is just unrealistic.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›