this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2026
421 points (99.3% liked)

politics

31034 readers
2111 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Marafon@sh.itjust.works 64 points 1 month ago

To the shock of absolutely no one who has been paying attention.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 62 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's murder even if someone is likely involved in drug trafficking. Nobody involved has been tried or convicted, and the penalty for drug trafficking is not death in any civilized country.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Usually you have this thing called due process that helps you figure out whether or not the accused are actually criminals.

[–] homes@piefed.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Not in international waters, you don’t.

There, the US gets to kill brown people indiscriminately.

/sad

[–] MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Way to be 8 months behind, dipshit. As one of my two senators, what are you doing about it? As one of the senators who voted to reopen the government when everybody was on board with keeping it shut down until the right shit got funded, are you starting to understand how fucking wrong you were? Do something of value or fuck off.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He wrote a letter to Trump!

What do you expect him to do? Loudly demand that this war be ended TODAY, and loudly demand that his fellow Democrats join him, and vote against EVERYTHING until this war is fully ended, close down the government, close down everything until we stop committing world-class terrorism?

Nah, a letter should do it.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 1 month ago

A letter that gives Trump an out by saying he didn't order anything illegal. About as useful as herpes.

[–] Snowies@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The government’s reaction to the Trump regime reeks of weaponized incompetence.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

Because it is

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

Way to be 8 months behind, dipshit

Tbf, that's almost 34 years further than the "every election takes place in 1992" Clintonite "Centrist" bastard usually is 🤷🏻

[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Aside from the whole No-Shit-Sherlock aspect to this...

The strikes have killed at least 218 people, according to ABC News' count.

The Pentagon has spent over $820 million on the campaign

Really? More than 3.75 million dollars per "enemy" killed would be a complete boondoggle even if they were valid targets.

[–] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Jfc, I know I'm against this kind of thing, but for that money you could send me in on an old parachute with a revolver.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 month ago

The double-tap was definitely a war crime. Attacking people in the water after their vessel was hit is literally the example they use in the part of the US Navy's manual in the section where they define war crimes.

[–] Trilogy3452@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Bombing before a trial, what could go wrong

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Elect conservatives (regressives), get war crimes.

And higher costs of living.

And more transmissible diseases.

And infringed rights.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Did you have your eyes closed whenever the dems were doing their war crimes?

[–] vinsombra@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You are in fact right, but given a binary choice between war crimes, or war crimes AND Fascists, I'm afraid the right choice is war crimes without the side order of Fascism.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

I'd prefer if America collapsed and gave the rest of the world a chance to breathe, but that's just me.

[–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I prefer my war crimes when they're limited to war zones and not entirely randomly across the globe.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So you had your eyes closed then, lol

[–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Anywhere can be a war zone if you wage war on it.

You're not wrong, I was just being glib though.

[–] jumjummy@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago
[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

What's a war crime if it's never punished?

[–] FrankFrankson@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I am Jack's complete lack of suprise.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 1 month ago

This loser is part of the problem.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago

NO FUCKING SHIT

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

Really? Shocked I tell you shocked.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

Little late to the party, eh, Tim? Just like the rest of your stupid friends.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Ya but they were brown people. No one will be held accountable. Wish I was joking.

[–] IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Has America killed innocent American citizens before in order to achieve a goal of theirs?

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Every day. That isn't even new for this administration, although they're more open about not giving a fuck that it happens, and that it's part of the plan.