It's about economic and strategic interests for the US. These have held true for decades, across all kinds of US admininstrations, and predates any real evangelical fervor. The US is guaranteed Israeli support, since Israel depends entirely on the US for its existence. In the spirit of "the purpose of a system is what it does", I don't believe that the US ever disapproves of the horrors Israel commits. The US could exercise power whenever it wants, but it rarely if ever does. Of course, Israel has its own interests, but they rarely contradict US goals in the region.
electric_nan
joined 4 years ago
I mean, none of them would describe themselves as an-prim.
They all have support of industrialized areas. None of them are/were an-prim.
How do they manufacture their defensive weapons or communications equipment in harmony with nature? I'm just saying that an-prim isn't a realistic model for the world.
I think it sounds nice, but it's hard for me to take it seriously.
Death to Israel. Zero right to exist.
This sounds like anarcho-primitivism.
We need a crowd-sourced parallel surveillance network that tracks cops and politicians. Faces, license-plates, Bluetooth...
Look hard enough, or message the sellers and you can get Luigi.
For real.
"It's socialism or barbarism!". It's because there hasn't been any other convincing arguments otherwise. If you give the capitalists an inch, they'll eventually take it all. You cannot allow capital to accumulate to the degree that it wields real political power.
Saw a bartender wearing this one.
Coworker just picked up this crazy thing. It's a .22 imported from the Philippines.
view more: next ›
Allowing billionaires to exist is for the weak.