this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2026
1096 points (94.9% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

40566 readers
4704 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OS2Warp@lemmy.zip 259 points 1 week ago (6 children)
[–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 192 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 56 points 1 week ago (4 children)

So I've wanted to do this for a minute..

But how many paper straws would you have to use to offset one of these explosions? How long would it take to offset one of these explosions through straw use?

Writing this now I was surprised by the results...

Source for plastic v paper straw data

So apparently plastic straws are actually more carbon neutral than paper straws, but for the purposes of this analysis I'm going to carry it through to find out how long it takes to create equivalent emissions.

Paper straws:

Call it 1430 grams of emissions per straw (which is wild btw)

Plastic straws:

Call it 610 per plastic straw. Still wild for something which weighs less than a gram.

This is also from the thesis

So yeah.. not great.

Gonna be using 825 tons of carbon dioxide emitted from Hank Green's video.

I think Hank is working in US standard units here.. which is also weird and annoying but whatever... We're getting to units of rocket explosion per straw so it's fine..

And I'm going to be using 500 million straws per day, which is cited in the thesis from a 2017 study and repeated elsewhere in other studies on this.

It's not great but what even are we doing here..

I don't know how we get a plastic straw versus compostable straw use rate (what proportion of straws are still plastic versus how many are now paper or some other alternatives)

But we get 820 additional grams of emissions for each straw swapped.

500 tons to grams is:

838238016

Divided by the difference in co2e foot print per straw...

838238016 / 820 is about 1022240, in other words, about a million.

So for about every million straws swapped from plastic to paper, one giant fiery rocket explosion of CO2 emissions occurs.

The US consumes straws at a convenient rate of 500 million a day, so if ALL of those straws were converted to paper, we're setting off about 500 of those explosions per day.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I was always given to understand that the straw thing was because plastic straws get out and fuck up wildlife, but that message seems to get buried in handwringing over climate change so often that I suspect bad actors are at play spreading all these memes.

load more comments (6 replies)

Does that include the co2 generated by the incineration of each straw at the end of their life? Assuming you're in a region that can incinerate trash instead of landfilling it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Photonic@lemmy.world 54 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (22 children)

This image looks like right wing corpo propaganda to me. Not only does it divert the attention away from the handful of megacorporations emitting 80% of all green house gases, it is attacking a moderate leftist – who admittedly causes a relatively large amount of greenhouse gases.

But Taylor Swift is not making most of those flights on a personal basis. It’s to provide a service to fans. So in that sense we can regard the emissions as those of Taylor Swift the company. And in that sense they are much lower than many other companies who we often give a free pass.

So, yes hold the big emitters responsible, but let’s start with the 57 on the list and work our way down to Taylor Swift.

[–] JDPoZ@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bingo.

It invites hatred from a sizeable (though perhaps potentially less politically-aware) fan base that might otherwise be receptive.

Using someone as popular as Swift as a target for less-pop-culture-interested folks who are politically informed is clearly kicking the hornets’ nest to stir up in-fighting among the working class.

Next time use Bezos or one of the other folks who showed up in that “Dialog” secret society since they also use private jets in the same way someone like Swift does, but in addition are far worse in every other way and who also lobby with their billions towards worsening the world in every way imaginable.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Taylor swift is a leftist just like my racist boss has a black friend and is thus not racist.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
[–] lime@feddit.nu 14 points 1 week ago

taylor swift's private plane is a 1947 boeing b-47 stratojet?

girl's got style.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 144 points 1 week ago (17 children)

There's so much plastic lining that paper otherwise everything would get too soggy anyway. Yay for glass and metal. Reusable beats disposable, no matter what it's made of

[–] peetabix@sh.itjust.works 48 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

Theres a plastic lining in aluminium cans too. So glass is the way.

[–] alanjaow@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (5 children)

It's quite thin for aluminum, and the downside with glass is the high energy cost of melting it. I'd like if we went back to washing and reusing bottles, but I suppose that's a big shift in processing capabilities.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] wunami@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Some poorly made reusable shopping bags rip or otherwise break before they get used enough times to break even with the single use disposable plastic shopping bags they are supposed to replace. Especially the cheap ones bring given out as freebies.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 38 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (10 children)

That's bullshit from the oil companies. They did a "study" that concluded that, but if you read the methodology, they made the assumption that the reusable bag would be unusable after 20 uses.

Meanwhile I've been going to the grocery store every week for quite a few years using the same bags without much issue. I've had one strap on a bag break after ~10 years of use, so there's that I guess. Still haven't thrown it out, keep meaning to repair it which I never get around to doing.

Anyway, if you read between the lines of the study conducted by the oil companies, if you reuse the bag more than 20 times (half a year of going to the grocery store every week) you are reducing plastic waste.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] autriyo@feddit.org 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If they're made from fabric they're pretty repairable though.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] weirdcarrotmonster@sh.itjust.works 109 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

There is actually a bit of sense in there. Paper cups weren't simply paper - its tetrapak-like material with plastic coating inside. They are notoriously hard to recycle. Plain plastic cups on the other hand are made from single material, most likely PET. Moreover, they are transparent, without colouring additives.

There are two reasons why colour in plastic makes it harder to recycle. First, pigment is a completely different substance, which behaves differently from plastic itself. It makes it harder to "re-melt" into stable material. If you ever 3d printed anything with matte/gloss filament, you'll know that it is more finicky than plain one. Second, uncoloured plastic can be coloured into anything, while other needs to be either sorted by colour or mixed with strong dye (black, gray, dark brown, etc) to have consistent colour.

PET itself is pretty easy to turn into something new, actually. A workshop near me had a live demo of the whole process - chipping it into small pieces, feeding to the heated tube, and then injection molded into trinkets. Industrial grade processing usually have "turned into pellets" step in between, but it's basically the same.

Plastic-covered paper, on the other hand, should be somehow separated first, and then handled with two different approaches - one for paper, another one for plastic film. Doable, but much harder. Paper straw can probably decompose by itself, without any special conditions.

UPD: Be wary that recycling is not a panacea. There's multiple videos about how recycling plastic isn't actually a thing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68zjxTTl5Ik for example.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

this would be a legitimate argument if any of the plastic was actually recycled ... last time i checked it all goes into the incinerator to make electricity out of it.

the recycling of plastic is difficult, not because melting and re-shaping the plastic itself is difficult (it is not, it's trivially easy); the problem is that you basically never get correctly-sorted garbage. when you get "plastic waste", it has at least 20% things in it that are not plastic, including food waste, aluminum, paper, etc. some even throw toxic batteries in it, chemicals (soap), pharmaceuticals ... then there's the risk of infections on the plastic (viruses, bacteria, fungi). there's absolutely no chance that you're just gonna take plastic waste and mold it into a new shape that's food safe. best you can do is to mix it with concrete and use it as a construction material in road construction.


edit: the video you linked is really watchable.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] turbowafflz@lemmy.world 76 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Still waiting on straws made of dry pasta. Biodegradable, strong, edible if you really want

[–] irq0@infosec.pub 54 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Badabinski@kbin.earth 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] troybot@piefed.social 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

$140 USD for a box of pasta. You should buy a box and let us know. To be fair that gets you a few thousand straws but no matter how hungry I am I can't eat that many pieces of noodle.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Wouldn’t those significantly alter the taste of whatever they’re sitting in?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NastyNative@mander.xyz 42 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Many people don't understand why plastic straws are considered more harmful than plastic cups. The key issue is that straws are far more likely to escape waste management systems due to their small size, allowing them to pass through filtration screens and enter waterways. As a result, they reach the ocean at a higher rate and pose a greater threat to marine life, including sea turtles. Larger items like plastic cups are generally easier to capture and contain before they become environmental hazards.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I mean waxed paper cups aren't super, they are likely better than plastic, but the wax is likely a fossils fuel byproduct

[–] turdas@suppo.fi 26 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I believe they increasingly use PLA which is a bioplastic. But yeah it used to be, and in many cases likely still is, polyethylene which is an oil product.

[–] Axiochus@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

PLA is not compostable or anything of the sort. So honestly it's more of a "this plastic could be recycled, given that it's sorted out from the other plastic, and given financial viability".

Edit: as pointed out below, it's more correct to say that it's not home-compostable

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

PLA very much is compostable, but only in composting facilities designed to handle bioplastics, which most aren't (and also additives like pigments likely aren't compostable).

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Yup, just looked it up from your comment because it made me realize that I had no idea what wax was actually made of.

Paraffin wax is a colorless solid derived from petroleum, coal, or oil shale, consisting of hydrocarbon molecules

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (7 children)

The real trick all along was always reducing your consumption of disposable products.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'll take a PLA cup over a paper cup lined with PFAS, BPA, etc.

There should really be a law that people should be able to bring their own reusable drink cup for any drink.

[–] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 week ago (4 children)

But then they might get extra drink! Unconscionable!

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (10 children)

if people knew just how little the typical fountain drink cost, cups and straws included, they would riot over the costs.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 week ago

Sidenote: all 4 include plastic.

[–] Aarkon@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 1 week ago

Fair point. IIRC though the primary reason for banning plastic straws was not CO2 emissions but wildlife protection, as plastic straws are (or were) the single most frequently found foreign object in the stomachs of dead sea turtles.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

paper straws are quite literally a strawman project against environmental pollution. they do not actually solve environmental pollution while pretending they do ..

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] brap@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I've never seen the one on the right. I'm guessing this is an American thing?

[–] frog@feddit.uk 13 points 1 week ago

Yes, corporations guilt tripped Americans to use shittier products while they spill their garbage in the water.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Paper cups still have a plastic lining, and it's related to PFAS chemicals iirc

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 14 points 1 week ago

Go back to them being wax coated.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IckabodKobain@feddit.online 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The cup wasn't just made of paper. It was paper with a Wax Coating.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It hasn't been wax in decades, its polyurethane.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] huey_m@reddthat.com 17 points 1 week ago (14 children)

There needs to just be a blanket, punitive, 100+% tax on any and all single use plastics that are not medical devices. Obviously there's lots of other bigger environmental issues that need to be tackled but this really seems like a pretty obvious one imo.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] whereitsat@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

i remember the great plastic transition of 1995. on the trek though GRAND UNION to buy macaroni salad ingredients and store brand chips, i asked my mom why there were so many plastic bottles, and she replied 'we're like pioneers' and she referenced little house on the prairie, and i still didn't understand what she was getting at, so she slapped some sense into me right in aisle 13 and i pretended i understood so she'd leave me alone for five minutes.

a few weeks ago my MD said that i have colon cancer and i assume that's from pounding cases of fruitopia when it was in vogue but who am i gonna sue? is big plastic a thing?

i tried to tell my mom it was her fault but when i tried to call all i heard was a dial tone. i thought that was weird at the time because cell-phones don't have dial tones but my therapist said i was hallucinating; she still won't prescribe me xanax.

[–] SaintNyx@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Ppl have been mentioning the plastic in the paper cups but I haven't seen anyone mention that large cups used to all be Styrofoam. Some places all the cups were Styrofoam. And that was god awful for the environment. They were amazing though. Getting a giant sweet tea in a cup that never sweated was phenomenal. Shame they suck so bad.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›