this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
244 points (97.3% liked)

politics

30192 readers
2565 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] guyoverthere123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Fake news. No way Trump is a top.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

He gives bottom energy for sure.

[–] GutterRat42@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

He gives sits-in-the-corner-by-himself-because-he-is-not-allowed-to-participate energy

[–] Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Don't you have to conquer something to be a conqueror?

I've conquered the entire world in multiple RTS games. One time i conquered an entire galaxy. Does that count?

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 days ago

He technically conquered Venezuela

You know what's funny with people who have the narcissistic personality disorder, is they themselves do not see anything wrong with them.

[–] Fribbizz@feddit.org 6 points 6 days ago

Conquerors are worthless. They come and go. What makes a realm/an empire stick around and last, is if the leader is a good administrator. What set the Romans aside was not so much military ability, though they had that. What set them aside was their ability to organise, plan and administer.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Oh yes Mr president, you aren't a bitch at all! /s

ha ha ha, fuck you.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 6 days ago

What a loser.

[–] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 days ago

Rump is useless a bulls on a tit.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Well, i mean he surrendered more times than those conquerors, so theres that....

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago

This all started with him getting the pee prize in russia.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

I mean, sure but he has to use a splint to do it.

[–] FullPenguin@lemmy.world 126 points 1 week ago

Based on the Iran Deal, he seems more like a bottom to me.

[–] redlemace@lemmy.world 73 points 1 week ago (3 children)

you can describe trump in one word : megalomaniac

[–] GutterRat42@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago
[–] notabot@piefed.social 36 points 1 week ago (4 children)

That's definitely a good word, but I think you need a few more to really round out that description; words like: senile, bitter, gullible, weak, thin-skinned, foolish, and evil.

[–] barneyrubble@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Psychopath.

[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)

rapist, pedophile, asshole

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 days ago

The most accurate descriptors

[–] redlemace@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

you missed three from the top of the list: greedy, self-centered, egoistic

[–] moshankey@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago
[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

2 words, malignant narcissist

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

3 words: Incompetent malignant narcissist

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago

4 words: Racist incompetent malignant narcissist

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 42 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Don can't, but Genghis Khan.

[–] gankouskhan@piefed.zip 3 points 6 days ago

I don't want to support his pun, but here's an upvote

[–] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I didn’t have the ghost of Genghis Khan killing Trump on my 2026 bingo card

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

While in reality he's a power bottom for Bibi and Putin to tag team

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Hardly call him a POWER bottom. That implies he has the ability to move his shambling corpse in a way other than a lurch.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

The author of the post that Trump is the "most powerful man that ever lived" is probably correct. Think about it: the US has the largest military in the world, and can project power anywhere. Historically, while this power has been built up, in America the ability to wield it has been carefully constructed so that it has to go through several layers of responsibility before being used, and different parts of government can perform their own checks on that ability.

Then Trump comes along, and many of those checks and balances dissolve. Somehow, he has successfully aligned enough of our government to his agenda that he can launch a war (and lose it!) without being held responsible for the result.

That is Trump's superpower - the ability to do whatever he wants, with impunity. That's not supposed to happen in our modern society, but he figured out how. Perhaps the key is having no shame, so he can ask for things that no other politician would think is appropriate? But with that kind of power, he really is ruling like a king, with the largest military in history (and all those nukes) at his command. Who's gonna say "no" to him at this point? He got rid of everyone who might.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (3 children)

On the other hand how effective is the US military really? Its got a lot of fancy toys but sure did just fall flat on its face despite what should have been overwhelming advantages.

[–] evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

It's the big difference between grand strategy and tactics. You can win every single battle and still lose a war. Grand strategy comes from the top. If the mad emperor tells his troops to make war on the sea, is it really on the troops when they lose?

"War is a continuation of policy", so what happens when there is no policy? What would "winning" even have looked like?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] slothrop@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

From another article:

Trump said the document came from a “historian,” but Haberman and Swan later found that its author was Dave King, a longtime caddy and confidant of golfer Gary Player.

[–] cmbabul@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 week ago

Ok this is mostly unrelated, but the name Gary Player is a pretty great name for any professional athlete

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

don’t hate the Player; hate the game

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Jesus H. Christ on a pogo stick… will you just go away already … or just die. Either is cool. Hopefully from a stroke on the toilet. Because anything else would make it worse.

I am so tired of hearing about all the stupid shit he says on a daily basis. I will be so happy when he is a distant memory.

I have some very expensive whiskey just waiting.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It won't matter what he eventually dies from. Even if the cheeseburger is still half eaten in front of him, half the US population is going to insist it was an assassination plot by Hillary and Obama

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Unfortunately you are not wrong

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

What a terrifically stupid claim. He has no idea what is going on.

Historian David King is even more frightening, check this guy's hard drive.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago

Shhhhh! Quiet! 🤫🤐!!! He's sleeping 😴 again!

I, Caligula...

load more comments
view more: next ›