this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2026
255 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30166 readers
3039 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 2piradians@lemmy.world 97 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I never thought I'd see the day when a politician spewing obvious lies in an interview, engaging in ad hominem attacks against the interviewer, and storming off like a toddler would achieve anything but alienation.

But this will go mostly unnoticed by his supporters. Cue Carr threatening NBC's broadcast license in 3, 2, 1...

[–] brem@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Most villains have at least one interesting trait.. but Fuckbrains McCheeseburger is a generic villain from a dollar store comic book written by a team of slugs.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The fact that he spent decades fucking kids with Epstein is sort of interesting. He might be eligible for some kind of "bigliest pedo rapist" award. It's interesting enough that they should release the rest of the files like they're legally obligated to do.

[–] brem@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The Epstein list is pretty big, he shares the title of "Kiddo Didler" with at least several dozen or hundred other people just as dumb & fat & old as himself. Maybe not as powerful, but that's not something he did. He's just a useful idiot/rapist/grifter/felon.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s pretty clear that he was also an “Epstein organizer”, which is, incredibly, even more bad than kid diddler

[–] brem@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Imagine the worst thing you can think of, that cretan licked it first, then sold it to the wealthiest creep.

He's still doing it, only now under the title of the president.

[–] Ariselas@piefed.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

written by a team of slugs. Don't insult slugs, even Vogons have poetry

[–] brem@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

I didn't know I'd need my towel for this conversation. Nice. I love you!

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

His interesting trait is being so impressed with himself that he can't delegate to smart people to succeed, instead delegating to those stroking his ego.

[–] brem@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I know a fuckton of folks that act just like him.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I know someone that is like him a lot. She fucking hates him though to her credit. Acts just like him though. The bloody minded schitzo that she is, and also a narcissist.

[–] brem@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Sounds like the kind of person I fall in love with before realizing I've wasted 6 years of my life. Maybe it's why my hair stood on end when he ran for president the first time. She wasn't orange or a rapist, but she was a narcissist and BPD. Nothing against BPD, but fuuuuuck narcissists. I know they say "crazy in head, crazy in bed" (which is true for me & many others), but throws up.. nevermind. My imagination wasn't ready for that metaphor. projectile vomits

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

unnoticed by his supporters

I think many of his supporters will applaud him for this. The maga crowd seem very immature and childish, which is probably why they like him. They think this is the right way to act.

[–] brem@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

If they haven't changed their minds by now, nothing will.

Might as well give up on those people, at least for now. They can't be helped and they won't help.

It's up to good people to do good things whilst the rest of the world ruins the final good things we had left.

When it's finally over, if any wit or wisdom or talent or honesty is left, it'll need to be carried forward.

..so stay hydrated with clean water! We need you in the future!!

[–] YoiksAndAway@piefed.zip 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I would characterize it as more of an angry shamble than a storming off.

[–] brem@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

Shits everyone's pants, waddles off in anger & senile confusion

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

He walked slowly away, not a storming off by any measure.

But this will go mostly unnoticed by his supporters.

His supporters will only know about it when their right-wing propaganda channels mention it in passing but spin it so hard even the anchors get dizzy.

[–] Gr0mit@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago

I thought it was telling how he kept referring to it as “your country…” instead “this” or “our country”.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

It was a dirty election, and it’s happening again right now in California.

For those out of the loop they're still counting votes for the primary election in California that happened a week ago. Top two vote getters in the primary advance regardless of party. The moderate dem Becerra has already advanced, it's now down to the Republican Hilton who holds a shrinking lead and the more progressive dem Steyer who's gaining on him. Trump wants to shutdown voting so Hilton can keep his lead even though there's still millions of ballots outstanding that could very well push Steyer over the edge.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Isn't there a provision that if any candidate gets a simple majority (>50%) in the primary they win the general by default? Or did I dream that up

[–] varnia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Dear US Americans, how is this guy still in charge? Please explain - I don't get it.

[–] StaticFalconar@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago

The same way UK left the EU.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

Russia + facebook + corporate news media being complicit and owned.

At least that’s how we got here for the first several years. How it’s still happening is more about the news media, and the absence of it (i.e. Xitter, youtube) I think.

And let’s not pretend it’s not coming for everyone. Canada - heads up.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 weeks ago

Because the alternate reality the right constructed for their part of the population, along with the oligarchs cooperatively capturing the democratic party and turning it into Reek from Game of Thrones.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

The oligarchs.

[–] SillyDude@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

The DOW is at 50,000!

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

He is not in charge. The world is a lot more complex than Trumplethinskin supposedly running the US. To be honest, he can't even run a business unless it is into the ground.

A better question is who is actually in charge.

[–] ape_arms@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Take it as a warning of how little each of us really understands about the way the world works.

[–] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

Absolute Pussy.