this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2026
666 points (98.8% liked)

Science Memes

20792 readers
70 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 147 points 2 months ago (4 children)

30,000 is roughly 1/3 of 60,000,000.

VERY roughly. Lol

[–] DiarrheaSommelier@lemmy.ca 80 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Logarithmically scaled image. I'll leave the determination of the base of the Log as an exercise for the viewer.

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I would show my proof, but I don't have enough space in this margin

[–] Jamesian@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

I'm here for this comment all day.

[–] neatchee@piefed.social 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

well, we know bison in the middle are worth approximately 75 each...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 months ago (3 children)

yeah this graphic is terrible

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] muhyb@programming.dev 6 points 2 months ago

Yeah, we need 799613 more bison images to justify the graphic.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago

It's only off by roughly 20,000,000

[–] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 75 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Each of the bison shapes in the 60mil example are actually clusters of bison so small you can't see them with the naked eye.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Jokes on you, I wear glasses and still can't see them

[–] Apocalypteroid@anarchist.nexus 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Jokes on you, I have no eyes and I can't even read what you said.

[–] blackbrook@mander.xyz 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The jokes on you, the post you couldn't read contains the winning lottery numbers.

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Jokes on you, those winning lottery numbers were for the hunger games. Here’s your bow and arrow

[–] DiarrheaSommelier@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago

Joke's on you, my eyes are the only part of me that isn't naked right now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lectricleopard@lemmy.world 67 points 2 months ago (3 children)

The decision to stop was required, but a ton of work was done to help the population rebound. What kind of misguided message is this trying to send?

[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 34 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's trying to tell people who think it's too much work to bother that it's not. I do it all the time, like when I have to wash the dishes and I tell myself "I'll just wash one dish" because I know if I do that I'll be a lot more motivated to continue, but if I keep looking at the whole problem before I start, I'll be too overwhelmed to do anything at all.

[–] stray@pawb.social 4 points 2 months ago

That's about how I read it. Sometimes you don't have a solution to fix a problem, but ceasing to make it worse is a valuable course of action in itself. The bison aren't back the way they were, but they're not extinct either.

[–] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 24 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Sure, the bison population is 0.05% of what it once was. And now that we're not actively attempting to extinct them, everything is hunky dory and no more work is needed.

I don't know how else to interpret this. It sounds like the Bison Society would rather be a society dedicated to literal anything else. The Kick the Can Down the Road Society, perhaps.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I think it gets the point across even if it's off by orders of magnitude.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] j_z@feddit.nu 32 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Because they finally caged the velociraptor in the middle image?

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Look at the gunbarrel around it. That's the velociraptor equivalent of James Bond. You can't put it in a cage.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't think this is to scale.

[–] Plebajer@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I agree. Bison are much larger than that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fishy@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 47 points 2 months ago

graph designer "i don't like math" scale

[–] cddlhssy@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Settlers killed buffalo to force indigenous people into the reservation system. It was a big part of the genocide here, worth looking into if you get the chance.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] tinfoilhat@lemmy.ml 25 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Each buffalo in the first picture represents 242,914 buffalo. Which means the last picture would be about 1/10th of a bison, and the middle one would be just the tip of a horn.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

300 is a hell of a bottleneck

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Apparently there is a certain amount of inbreeding with cattle, but several large herds without any interbreeding with cattle are closely managed to prevent inbreeding.

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

TIL There are 30,000 free roaming bison but there are 500,000 total including privately owned and commercial herds.

[–] Soapbox@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yep. They are also far better for the land they graze on than cattle, as they evolved here, and so they generally eat only what they should and don't overgraze. The meat is also far leaner and healthier than beef. We really should stop raising cattle and raise bison. The biggest issue is even "domesticated" bison are far more wild and dangerous to raise than the cattle we have bred to be docile. So risk averse ranchers are not interested.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] crimsonpoodle@pawb.social 17 points 2 months ago

I like the optimistic message but the graph scale is throwing me

[–] megopie@beehaw.org 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Also, like, it wasn’t just a “decision to stop” it was the end of a coincidence of factors. The mid century climatic conditions that led to several years of poor grass growth, with the combined hunting efforts of European American settlers on rail roads supported by the army’s policies against the Great Plains Indians, south eastern Indians displaced in to the great planes, and Great Plains Indians intensifying hunting via sophisticated methods they’d developed using horseback and fire arms, all driven by a demand for buffalo hides for use in industrial machinery. The end of the bad climatic conditions and the collapse of the hide trade due to development of other industrial materials is what stoped the over hunting.

With the pressures of hunting decreased and a historic climatic event over, the population was able to rebound somewhat, but, due to the encroachment of farms and ranching never really recover. Also the genetic bottleneck of the population probably hasn’t helped things but that’s not super well studied.

[–] 5too@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So I'm not bothered by the inconsistent scale... but why is there a dinosaur peeking through the bottom of the 1889 column?!

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 months ago

They were closing in on extinction?

[–] OddMinus1@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I don't know the history of bison population. From the image, I assume there used to be a ton of bison. But then a science experiment involving velociraptors went awry, and only a small group of bison were left alive. Then those bison made an uprising against the velociraptor-experiments and invaded their area, allowing their population to grow again.

How far off am I?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Wait. I need to know more about the Aperture Science dinosaur in 1889.

[–] just_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

So thats why charles in rdr2 was so mad about some foreigners killing bisons. Never knew they were endangered (also im not an american)

[–] orioler25@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They weren't naturally, the US state nearly exterminated the species as a tool of genocide against multiple Native American nations.

"They were god damn monsters" (said in arthur morgan's voice)

[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 5 points 2 months ago

I'm not American either, but have heard of the near bison extinction. They made literal mountains of nothing but bison skulls.

They skinned them and left their meat and bones to rot all over the prairie.

It's hard to imagine it if you haven't seen the pictures. Even then, it's impossible.

It's crazy to think about. Especially because it's such a cool and unique animal. I'm just happy that bison still exist. I hope their population keeps growing even though they will never be as many as they were.

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 2 months ago

Thank goodness for the Bronx Zoo and the WCS.

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

Science/Biology question for someone. If the Bison that exist today are all sourced from those last 300 Bison, are there genetic bottlenecks/recessive traits and defects that we've just permanently given to the entire Bison species forever and ever?

load more comments
view more: next ›