I see. So if our ideal candidate isn't possible anymore for the next election, we should always vote for the worse candidate, to drive people further towards public outcry, until civil unrest can get the real goal accomplished.
Makes perfect sense
the goal post has never moved from "try to leave the world better because of me or worse in spite of me, rather than better in spite of me or worse because of me"
surprise: I can hold two thoughts in my head at once
well, we know bison in the middle are worth approximately 75 each...
in context, I actually took it as a compliment. I already knew I was neuro-spicy, just not how bad exactly, and their comment confirmed both that I have significant challenges, and that I'm smart af, enough to compensate well even before therapy
I was told by a psychologist that my thoughts are so fast and jumbled that if I weren't relatively smart, I'd never have been able to hold down more than a fast food asst. manager job 🙃
Yes. Please list things that a sitting federal politician can do when both chambers of Congress and the presidency are in opposition party control, which are not purely performative nonsense
Monkeys.... monkeys... it's full of the monkeys!!!!
Now draw her as a pirate named Guybrush Threepwood
There are two types of people in the world...
People who need closure....
There's only one mod of !mop@quokk.au
I commented on their meme about Kamala Harris being just as likely to commit war crimes as Trump with an admittedly snarky, sarcastic reply that basically said "some of us wanted to whatever we could, as little as it might be, instead of watching the world burn. Must feel real morally superior safe behind that keyboard"
They banned me from the community for it.
Kinda funny for a community that bills itself as "free from the influence of .ml"
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you didn't realize I'm a different person.
The two thoughts I hold are "on election day, it's self-gratifying not to vote for the outcome with the highest lows, raising the floor" and "before and after election day, do whatever you can to make the lives of politicians who fail miserable and support better candidates, up to and including civil unrest"
Not voting is categorically ineffective. There may be plenty of things more effective than voting, but not voting isn't one of them.
People love to present this scenario like it's a lever with three positions: candidate A, candidate B, or civil unrest. But it's not. It's one switch with two buttons (candidate a, candidate b) and another separate button for civil unrest. You can do both