this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2026
231 points (97.9% liked)

politics

29343 readers
1938 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Trump administration aims to deploy counterterrorism tools against far-left groups, even as it has offered little evidence they present a dire threat.

I note that the US has completely suppressed the pipeline for recruiting left-wing vandals, let alone terrorists.

all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 13 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

They literally don't know what "antifa" means, do they?

[–] bender223@lemmy.today 1 points 6 hours ago

🤦‍♂️

[–] Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip 7 points 11 hours ago

Didn't they claim they caught the leader of antifa a month or 2 ago and it was like some random college kid?

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 0 points 9 hours ago

Tr*mp is consolidating his power, and no one will be more surprised than Republicans in DC are, when they're being marched to the noose.

[–] orenj@leminal.space 27 points 1 day ago

Sorry, who was threatening the destruction of an entire civilization to satisfy his political goals not even a whole week ago again? I wasnt paying any attention to this matter

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 64 points 2 days ago (2 children)

And by "far left," they mean anyone who's not a fascist.

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Anybody who isn't adamantly pro-capitalist.

Weird how much those groups overlap huh?

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 hours ago

I'm pretty sure they would also lock up someone who is pro-capitalist but anti-stock market as well.

[–] Goferking0@ttrpg.network 7 points 1 day ago

Hey, they also mean the democrats in office. So more anyone left of Mike Johnson? No that still catches other republicans.

Anyone who doesn't kiss the ring

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 105 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Western governments must combat “antifa and far-left terrorism,” Ms. Jacobsen’s prepared remarks asserted, casting the effort as an evolution in counterterrorism following the “global war on terror.” Her prepared speech defined far-left terrorism to include threats from communists, Marxists, anarchists, anticapitalists and those with “eco-extremist” and “other self-identified antifascist ideologies.”

Lol, welcome to Lemmy.

Seriously though, they would totally come for Lemmy.

[–] AnalogHole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There is 0 chance they arent here and we arent already on a list.

White House Lemmy Terorist List

  1. Anon
  2. Anon
  3. Anon
  4. Anon
  5. Anon
  6. Anon...
[–] aquovie@lemmy.cafe 5 points 1 day ago

Please submit your driver's license for age verification.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

So freedom, getting along and being open and kind is the enemy now. Got it.

[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 66 points 2 days ago

Delusional as fuck pedophile pieces of shits. They're the only present threat to humanity... holy fucking shit!

[–] etherphon@piefed.world 22 points 2 days ago

Donald Trump is a pussy ass motherfucker, weak old decrepit piece of shit.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 50 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What far left groups? Vegan potluck groups?

[–] DandomRude@piefed.social 34 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

This refers to all political dissidents - it does not matter whether they are organizations, political movements, or individuals. What they have in common is that they draw attention to the regime’s crimes and advocate for consequences or even criminal prosecution.

This is enough for autocratic regimes to declare them enemies of the state, allowing them to persecute them completely arbitrarily, since they view the state solely as a tool for carrying out their own crimes. Anyone who stands in the way is an enemy and will be mercilessly persecuted.

As a rule, it is always minorities, intellectuals, journalists, civil rights movements, unions, and such that are targeted first - precisely those whom the regime must silence to prevent the population from rising up.

This is already happening in the U.S., and ICE is the secret police carrying out the “purge” outside the bounds of the rule of law.

The next steps are historically very well documented: for various dictatorships that have emerged throughout history.

The most obvious example is today’s Russia, but the rise of the Third Reich is also a good example of what is happening in the U.S.

The mechanisms have hardly changed: gaining control of the media, infiltrating the legal system, establishing a heavily armed secret police force that spreads terror, eliminating political opponents, and violently suppressing the people, so that resistance means persecution or death.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

70% of population

Arm up regardless. Full face respirators. Riot gear. Baby shampoo. LoRa meshtastic. Drones. Etc

Meshcore is growing rapidly and at this point, is better than meshtastic in most regions

[–] 4lan@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Been thinking about long range drones a lot lately. Great for surveiling surrounding areas, and many other use cases

[–] aquovie@lemmy.cafe 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The "ghost gun" 3D printing laws going around had me thinking about "ghost drones". I think a lot of the NDAA and FAA noise around drones is an attempt to gain control over domestic drone use. They're criminalizing flying a drone within 1km of ICE activities - which is impossible to know or avoid.

But you don't need an expensive flight controller, fancy ESC, or even brushless motors to get your basic drone in the air. An esp32, some mosfets, servos (for a wing), and brushed motors will get the job done. Will it compete in multiGP? Hell no. But it'll fly and it'll cost like $15.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

Any chance there's a good resource for how to build one of those ~$15 drones?

[–] 4lan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

i wonder how large a drone would have to be to support a light-weight, but high RPM, 22lr gun? say printed in PA12CF, for instance.

[–] chosensilence@pawb.social 33 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

oh good this is when the Dems join forces to unite against a common enemy in both camps. i've read about this kinda thing before somewhere.