That is more than just a tweet. It is an explicit public statement of government policy, and an implicit statement that there is a lot going on behind the scenes, out of the public eye, based on the position taken in the public statement.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

No it's a Tweet. There is zero action behind it.

[–] villasv@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I agree this is just a tweet, but how do we know there's "zero" action behind it? What available options are not being pursued by the minister?

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

An interpol arrest warrant like Erdogan

Sanctions on Israel

Anything...

[–] villasv@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Are these things that the minister can truly achieve, though? Aren't sanctions up to the MPs? And the interpol arrest warrant, up to interpol?

[–] ProudCanadianCitizen@lemmy.ca -3 points 3 weeks ago

Unlike Trump, who tweets indiscriminately, tweets from the Canadian government are not 'just a tweet'. They are used judiciously and with forethought.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

Maybe that would be true - if there was much the Canadian government could do at all.

The Middle East isn't our region, and the one major player in our own region has very strong opinions of their own.

[–] Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Canada could stop sending weapons to Israel and disband the Israel/Canada free trade agreement

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's true, I guess. I don't know how many weapons we send them - it's almost all the US and Germany as of last I checked - but it looks like we do have free trade.

That would matter more than a Tweet, but not enough to really make Israel pause.

[–] Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

And this coming week, we have a fanatical Israeli settler who encourages genocide coming to Canada to give a talk about it!

[–] ProudCanadianCitizen@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I am not sure the legacy of Lester Pearson would agree.

https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/peace/1957/pearson/facts/

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Sooo what would the equivalent of that be today? The solution was to separate the warring parties with peacekeepers - separating the parties in this modern conflict amounts to invading and occupying Israel/Palestine, and I don't even think Canada would win that war. And, Israel's ally was European colonial powers just pursuing colonial interests, so they could be reasoned with, as opposed to the ideological-religious morass that's driving the US.

[–] ProudCanadianCitizen@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

In Kosovo, the mandate of the UN force changed from Peace Keeper to Peace Maker. But you are correct, in the Suez Crisis, they just hated each other. I do not really think either side was particularly genocidal. When one side is ideologically genocidal, probably not much except overwhelming military power will work to keep that side constrained.