stepan

Currently, one of my family members frequently sees a lot of conflicting nutrition and medical info on the internet with various influencers, so it can be hard for them to decipher what's true or not. Are there any channels with easy to understand shorts, that also meet the general scientific consensus?

Title.

There are some egregious misinterpretations here leading to harmful codes of law, here are some of them summarized.

-Privileging the Hanafi maddhab (the Hanafi rite) of sunni Islam, and their adherents

-Discrimination against those who do not follow the ashari/maturidi aqeedahs (ashari/maturidi creeds) of sunni islam, and their adherents. For example discrimination against followers of the Athari aqeedah (athari creed).

-arbitrary discrimination against Christians and Jews

-lack of civil-judicial rights including arbitrary imprisonment, sentencing, and punishment

-reopening slavery outside of the context of war

-allowing husbands to implement Ta’zir punishments (which are islamically not for husbands to do)

-allowing husbands to physically discipline their wives with no limits (no limits has no basis in islam)

• an ultra strict interpretation of gender segregation (which will be used to justify restricting female students from schools)

-classism by allowing less punishment for middle class over lower class

• giving extra, unislamic privileges to scholars - specifically in civil-judicial rights to escape criminal penalties , which is unislamic

-criminalizing any criticism of the government

And possibly more I missed.

There are some egregious misinterpretations here leading to harmful codes of law, here are some of them summarized.

-Privileging the Hanafi maddhab (the Hanafi rite) of sunni Islam, and their adherents

-Discrimination against those who do not follow the ashari/maturidi aqeedahs (ashari/maturidi creeds) of sunni islam, and their adherents. For example discrimination against followers of the Athari aqeedah (athari creed).

-arbitrary discrimination against Christians and Jews

-lack of civil-judicial rights including arbitrary imprisonment, sentencing, and punishment

-reopening slavery outside of the context of war

-allowing husbands to implement Ta’zir punishments (which are islamically not for husbands to do)

-allowing husbands to physically discipline their wives with no limits (no limits has no basis in islam)

• an ultra strict interpretation of gender segregation (which will be used to justify restricting female students from schools)

-classism by allowing less punishment for middle class over lower class

• giving extra, unislamic privileges to scholars - specifically in civil-judicial rights to escape criminal penalties , which is unislamic

-criminalizing any criticism of the government

And possibly more I missed.

I've only used plastic so far. A friend was moving and she gave me her wooden cutting board. I cut something with it, and some grease got on the cutting board. Now I can't remove the yellow spot no matter what I do. What can I do to clean it?

Which word works better as third alternative to monarchy vs Republic?

Suppose we are talking about a specific kind of theocracy.

A theocracy that is neither monarchy (no hereditary or dynastic succession), at the same time this theocracy is not a republic (no electoralism, at least not from the general public).

The reason I don't wanna use the word theocracy is because we have theocratic monarchies (Saudi Arabia) and theocratic republics (Iran). So I'm looking for a word that works more so for Afghanistan and its possible equivalents.

Something with clergy in the word.

My two choices are clericarchy and clericracy.

Between clericarchy and clericracy, I'm looking not for the better sounding word, rather the word that denotes clearly it CANNOT be monarchic NOR republican.

Like a third system if you will.

Which of my two options fits that better?