this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

[CLOSED] FediLore + Fedidrama

3161 readers
2 users here now

This community has been locked, please see the discussion here. The original sidebar contents can be found below:


***

# Rules

1. Any drama must be posted as an observer, you cannot post drama that you are involved with.
2. When posting screenshots of drama, you must obscure the identity of all the participants.
3. The poster must have a credible post and comment history before submitting a piece of history. This is to avoid sock-puppetry and witch hunts.

The usual instance-wide rules also apply.

***

Chronicle the life and tale of the fediverse (+ matrix)

Largely a sublemmy about capturing drama, from fediverse spanning drama to just lemmy drama.

Includes lore like how a instance got it's name, how an instance got defederated, how an admin got doxxed, fedihistory etc

(New) This sub's intentions is to an archive/newspaper, as in preferably don't get into fights with each other or the ppl featured in the drama

Tags: fediverse news, lemmy news, lemmyverse

Partners:

* [midwest.social/c/Fediverse](https://midwest.social/c/fediverse)
* [Sub promo](https://lemmy.ca/c/communitypromo)
* [Fedizens](https://lemmy.ca/c/fedizens)

The original community icon is here

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This isn't just relevant to Lemmy because it's culturally intertwined with Lemmy but also because there's a search engine database now that acts as a registry for anyone promoting any of the mass shooters (Luigi, Robin, Tyler, etc.).

China currently bans anyone from entering who denies their narrative about Tiananmen Square. It's the same deal here. There's also a couple of already-controversial Lemmy users who are collaborating with the US government by judas-kissing everyone after having honeypotted them. One of them having been infamous for banning people who promoted "blind alignment with Luigi Mangione" [sic].

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Those fuckers (sadly in charge) are scared shitless.

[–] PatrickStar@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

They have a weird way of showing it.

[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

There's also a couple of already-controversial Lemmy users who are collaborating with the US government by judas-kissing everyone after having honeypotted them.

What?

[–] Blaze@lazysoci.al 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] PatrickStar@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

That's a mess I was caught up in. None of those people are me or are liked by me.

[–] PatrickStar@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Judas-kissing is a midwest term. It means using covert means to mark someone as a person of interest for other people. It comes from the story of Judas kissing Jesus as a way to tell the Romans which person in the audience was Jesus.

"Honeypot" is government slang. It means an organization secretly made to keep track of a certain demographic. In this case, it refers to the government using the fediverse as a litmus test for whoever they think is worth putting under their radar.

[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you willing to name the Lemmy users doing this?

Your wording leaves me wondering whether you're suggesting that they're actively working with the feds, or just being helpful to them without that intent?

[–] PatrickStar@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

For better or worse, the government isn't dumb and they're aware not everyone in the fediverse is who they're looking for. The fediverse is very feudal, and the government has occasionally popped in to subtly ask the disillusioned for pointers, since simple spying often leads to questions. So there's active collaboration here.

Keep in mind this is a recent development in fairly old news. Trump was known in the beginning to vet immigrants for their social media presence. The freedom from lèse-majesté as it's called has been broken.

[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago

I've reported you to the US government. Removal pending

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So no, you can't name them. Or really have anything but speculation

[–] PatrickStar@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

Not really what I said. Though I think this was answered better in the other exchange where someone asked.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

for anyone promoting any of the mass shooters (Luigi, Robin, Tyler, etc.).

Luigi and Tyler are alleged assassins, NOT mass shooters.

[–] PatrickStar@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Whoops. Meant to say just "shooters".

[–] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Alleged shooters. I have not seen any conviction on Luigi yet.

[–] PatrickStar@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Has he even been in the news lately?

[–] Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, literally yesterday when the terrorism charges were dropped.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Venefica@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not to be a pedant, but the word assassination is usually used for government leaders and prominent people. I know that the far right in the US sees right wing podcasters as Jesus, but I don’t believe the person who shot and killed Kirk was trying to seize power. I absolutely could be wrong, of course

[–] epicstove@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago

They way they're treating Kirks death I would have thought he was some senator or high ranking military personnel.

...not some right wing influencer.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not pedantic if it educates. I appreciate the correction.

[–] Venefica@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago

It’s not your fault in any way. It’s what they’re using on the news. They’re treating this like a head of state was assassinated for power or something. People are calling the police if they see a flag that isn’t lowered. It’s insane here.

[–] s@piefed.world 0 points 1 year ago

I really do despise authoritarianism. If only there was some way to become rid of it.

[–] rhymeswithduck@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm confused. Is it just users furnishing the gov with usernames? Or is it mods, who could potentially have access to a user's email used to sign up with their instance? Do mods have access to that, or just admins?

[–] PatrickStar@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

A mix of all the above. Recall that time in American history that Orwell ratted on his comrades.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago

You can spin up your own instance and see a whole bunch of shit like IP addresses, vote history, etc.

I think it would be naive to think that the various 3 letter agencies wouldn't have their own instance to surveill us.

[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm forever grateful for the fact that I'm not 'Murican

[–] PatrickStar@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you ever plan to go to Murica or have family in Murica?

[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have someone special to me in 'Murica

We're working on her visa to get her the fuck out of there

I go over all the time to see her

[–] PatrickStar@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I delete all social media apps from my phone before I get to immigration

I'm there enough that they can see my travel history and I pretty much get waved through now

I make sure that I don't make myself a target though

[–] AndiHutch@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How are you aware of alleged Lemmy users collaborating with the US government? It almost sounds like you are implying you have insider knowledge of the focus of US federal agents.

[–] PatrickStar@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's not new news. It's just a new development in that news. Spying was already a topic with Luigi and Robin, but Charlie Kirk's assassination was an enormous deal apparently, with world leaders the world over paying respects. That kicked off a whole search engine based registry, which MSNBC reported on. Some of this involves a doxxing process, and even if this wasn't already made clear, you could put two and two together and get an idea that Lemmy would play a huge part in this and would be the thing all the paper trails lead to.

As for knowing exactly who is working with the NSA, people working for the agency would follow the same tactics. They entice a reaction, fake-debate with people, mine people for knowledge while knowing who probably is and isn't sympathetic to extremists (even though they would play it safe and treat everyone the same). They're not afraid to outright sit down with trustees though (recall the story of Orwell ratting out his comrades), and the crew behind the search engine registry isn't classified. Some people will brag and say they're working with the government as a flex, and occasionally it will be consistent with events surrounding suspects.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I see. So it’s speculation then.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 0 points 1 year ago (10 children)

When your adversary is the spooks... That's the best you are gonna get.

[–] PatrickStar@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

I couldn't have explained that aspect better. Thanks.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] PatrickStar@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

If by speculation you mean indirect confirmation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hate speech for thee, but not for me. Nazi scum do love their lists.

TheObviousSolution, that's "The" "Obvious" "Solution", without spaces.

Glad I don't live in the US because the administration is fine with promoting hatred against women, transgender people and people who aren't white but this is where they draw the line. Safe to say they're scared shitless. Good lmao

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

unless the nazi states of america start acting outside of their country, I don't think I'm too concerned about it. I'm not planning on ever visiting again, at least in the foreseeable future.

be safe down there, though, folks

[–] CanadianCorhen@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago

i'm pretty close to that. I've not said anything directly pro-murder, but plenty anti-kirk and anti-trump.

I'm not pro shooter, but, as a Canadian, my facebook page is full of political concerns about Trump, and the USA's decline into facism. I wouldnt expect to be allowed in into the anti-free speech zones Trump is creating.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago

Maybe I'm old fashioned but I don't think "pro-shooter content" should be a thing to begin with.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

China currently bans anyone from entering who denies their narrative about Tiananmen Square.

I don't think they do. I think they would if you decided to start telling people in China about it. But if you shut up while you're in China and haven't shown any signs of trying to influence the Chinese people, they don't really care.

[–] PatrickStar@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You'd be surprised. Any time some famous YouTube host says anything about Tiananmen Square, there's almost always an obligatory drama queen remark about being banned from China the moment it gets uploaded (I say "drama queen remark" because I would be surprised if anyone would actually want to go to China aside from seeing the great wall and marking it off a bucket list of every nation that ever existed).

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago

That's a celebrity. Nobody cares if you're an average person and not too loud. Although the list of celebrities on the Wikipedia list of banned people from China seems to be people who did/said stuff while in China, often to an audience.

load more comments
view more: next ›