this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2025
0 points (NaN% liked)

Malicious Compliance

22668 readers
2 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

======

Also check out the following communities:

!fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world !unethicallifeprotips@lemmy.world

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] killingspark@feddit.org 0 points 9 months ago (6 children)

Why the fuck would you censor "panicked"?

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Welcome to corpo controlled internet, where you write within their guidelines, not where you freely communicate like actual people.

[–] killingspark@feddit.org 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I mean even in corpo internet lingo where obscenity is censored... Panicked? Is panicked now negative enough of a word to deserve censorship? It's a crazy web out there

[–] TrojanRoomCoffeePot@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

Lowest common denominator strikes again with ludicrously unnecessary censorship. Not even curse words or things like "suicide" anymore, just whatever drifts past their sights.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 0 points 9 months ago

Its probably to avoid semantic analysis marking it as distressing or negative and deranking it for the target audience.

[–] StrixUralensis@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I believe that the persone who made the meme is just stupid

[–] blackbelt352@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Engagement bait for other platforms that are engagement algorithm driven fishing for this exact kind of comment.

[–] killingspark@feddit.org 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] blackbelt352@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

Well that one mark ended up making 13 of the comments in just this comment chain alone. 14 including this one I'm making, on a post with 50 comments on it, over 20% of them. If this were any other massive platform like reddit or Instagram or Facebook, this level of engagement would drive algorithms extremely effectively.

[–] joyjoy@lemmy.zip 0 points 9 months ago

It's like yelling "fire" in a crowded theater. Say "panic" on social media and suddenly everyone starts looting.

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 0 points 9 months ago

Oh, I thought it read panfucked. Whatever that means.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago

Looks more like a stray markup made while editing.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I believe it happened twice to two different people

[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

You mean it happened twice to each one of the 2 people?

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

If the boss wanted everyone lunching at once, I assume that's probably when they would take their own lunch, so they would have just closed the office for that hour.

[–] Sumocat@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Hanlon's razor: "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." Exact instructions with no allowance for judgment were given and followed exactly. Not malicious, just compliance with stupid instructions.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Erm ackshually that's not really a valid application of hanlon's razor because the entities being referred to as stupid or malicious are two separate beings

[–] Sumocat@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

That’s not a requirement of Hanlon’s razor. Stupidity can be introduced at any point in the process. If a commander orders a firing squad to form a circle and they shoot each other, that’s on the commander, not the squad for shooting each other.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Somehow I find the photo of a muscle guy with no clothes insulting for an "office" story.
It is just so disconnected from each other?

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

And? Does that make it better or worse? Personally I don't give a shit that he is a meme guy I knew that, but he is not the right meme guy for this sort of meme IMO.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's a story about workers flexing their strength against the boss and having the boss back down. It seems to fit just fine to me.

I can't possibly imagine why you seem to be so offended over all this.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Except it's not really malicious compliance, it's just compliance.
Not a single muscle was flexed.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago

Its not malicious compliance to hang up on a customer in the middle of a call, or ignore other customers calling during business hours because your boss mandates you take lunch at an exact time? Whatever you say, buddy.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

The muscle of the Union.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Memes are conceptual not literal

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

That's mostly true, except memes are ideas, more specifically ideas that spread by being repeated or more accurately by imitation.
I read the book where Richard Dawkins coined the term.
A key feature about a true meme is that it can evolve, which could be said to have been the case here if the meme had been changed. to use the drawing u/Appoxo made for me.

[–] TrojanRoomCoffeePot@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

OP sees the malicious compliance as a "chad" move, hence the use of Giga Chad meme.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Maybe, but I seriously doubt most office people find a ribbed extreme muscle guy representative of office workers. And especially not the women.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

It's not about representation, it's a symbol for being cool, visually unrelated to the person you're calling a chad. And it's intentionally extreme.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Sorry but giga chad doesnt come with noodle arms and a pouch :/

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Cool drawing. 👍
Except part of the issue was the naked part.
He should wear a shirt, or other form of typical office clothing.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 9 months ago
[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

"You" created it, you say?

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 9 months ago

I willed it into existence by utilizing another non-organic entity to manifest it.

And I am a real person. Thus the "" are falsely used.
Better use them this way: "Created"

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 9 months ago

jesse what the fuck are you on about

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 0 points 9 months ago
[–] NOOBMASTER@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Probably, I've been in a similar situation. Closers had to wait til the manger unlocked the front door to let you out at the end of the night. I wouldn't clock out, and others started to also. Wed sit there on the clock waiting for the managers then go punch out.

Also, they got pissed we were working an extra half hour or so to cleanup or sit at the gate, so when my shift was over, I clocked out and stopped working, even if I wasn't done. You don't schedule me til 9pm, then bitch I needed half an hour to cleanup and finish since the fucking door was open with customers til 9pm.

Fucking hated retail. Everyone after high school should work mandatory 1 year of retail or 2 years of military. Would curb a lot of this holier than thou narcissism bullshit really quick and have people treating each other with more respect.

[–] dondelelcaro@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Why is it that so many companies steal their employee's wages?

It's like they expect employees not to know better and contact an employment attorney and sue.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

They do expect were dumb. We're trained growing up with wrong info. You know how many people I've met that they think if they get a raise they'll make less money? Or how many don't understand basic tax brackets? Met a girl who thought each tax bracket was applied to your entire income, so millionaire tax was "ripping off millionaires" lmao.

Plus when healthcare and other things are tied to our job, you tend to not make waves and just fall in line. The system is fully against the working class.

Everyone after high school should work mandatory 1 year of retail...Would curb a lot of this holier than thou narcissism bullshit really quick and have people treating each other with more respect.

I've been saying the same thing since I worked retail many years ago. Would either save the world or destroy it, and I'm not sure which would be better.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

There's a certain set of people who would still treat retail workers like shit b/c "I had to put up with it, so they can too!" And I want to rake my foot down their shins just thinking about it.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

True, but I think more people would stand up also and call them out. I'd hope so at least.

[–] godfish@lemy.lol 0 points 8 months ago

Listen, I get that wearing a uniform and seeing the abyss that is human nature is very honorable, but don't compare that to the military. That's just killing poor people for the rich and powerful.

[–] texture@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

i was still happy to hear about it