Malicious Compliance

22676 readers

2 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

We ENCOURAGE posts about events that happened to you, or someone you know.
We ACCEPT (for now) reposts of good malicious compliance stories (from other platforms) which did not happen to you or someone you knew. Please use a [REPOST] tag in such situations.
We DO NOT ALLOW fiction, or posts that break site-wide rules.

======

Also check out the following communities:

!fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world !unethicallifeprotips@lemmy.world

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

Malicious compliance (media.piefed.world)

submitted 9 months ago by Little8Lost@lemmy.world to c/maliciouscompliance@lemmy.world

48 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/post/423354

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] killingspark@feddit.org 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I mean even in corpo internet lingo where obscenity is censored... Panicked? Is panicked now negative enough of a word to deserve censorship? It's a crazy web out there

[–] TrojanRoomCoffeePot@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

Lowest common denominator strikes again with ludicrously unnecessary censorship. Not even curse words or things like "suicide" anymore, just whatever drifts past their sights.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 0 points 9 months ago

Its probably to avoid semantic analysis marking it as distressing or negative and deranking it for the target audience.