Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
1) Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
2) No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
3) Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
4) No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
5) No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
I agree with this, but I think we should have some kind of linguistic distinction between pride as in ‘I’m proud I’m not one of those inferior people’ and pride as in ‘I am not ashamed of my heritage’. Because having one word being used both ways has led to people with wildly diverging interpretations of the same sentence.
I didn't even consider the first one to exist and was briefly upset at George for saying people shouldn't be proud/accepting of their base characteristics, but what you say makes sense of it for me.
A potentially mind-blowing thing that really drives this point home:
Obama is half-black and half-white (black father and white mother). He’s often and comfortably claimed to be the first black president, but never referred to as a white president, though he’s equally both.
Some races and ethnicities have historically been considered as subtractive, and this is the often unconsidered evil of ethnic or cultural allegiance.
Logically it still made sense, IMO. If he's half black and half white, while all previous presidents were only white, then the black part is the discriminating factor one could highlight as a success to deviate from the previous norm.
If you wanted to highlight this deviation without leaning in on the black part, you would have had to use something like “not fully white”, which would have been explicitly subtractive and therefore much worse.
Of course one could simply ignore the skin color completely, but I also see empowering in highlighting this shift of breaking an otherwise strict all white run.
Yeah, a monosyllabic word for "I didn't earn this, but I want to make it clear it's not something to be ashamed of either" would be pretty dope.
This is why I prefer the word "celebrate". I didn't do anything to achieve neurodivergence, it's not an accomplishment, so why would I be proud of it? But I can be proud of the times when I can push past the executive dysfunction and actually tidy my room.
But I can surely celebrate neurodivergence.
But that's just me. I don't mind if other people want to shout "autistic pride". I used to get accused of being "proud" and "arrogant" a lot by a family member when I was mute or in shutdown, so that might be why I feel an aversion to that word.
Why do you want to hold a celebration?
Because we're proud. Oh, dangit...
It's the last thing you can be proud of, if you have nothing else.
You think I should be proud more of having a hairy ass?
How can we evaluate whether you should be proud of it if you don't even post pics?
I still cringe when people still seem to hold onto some notion that America is the greatest thing ever. I'm not even talking about MAGA. Like people foolishly still believe a war mongering state like the US should forever be known as the greatest thing ever. Like legit. In their eyes, no other country has come close and no other country does anything just as good. The US is the only leader in anything in their eyes. They make it so dramatic about how much pride they have in the country when they've been fed propaganda all their lives. lmao
To them I say, it's not about U.S. vs the rest of the world. It's about us, the people, against the corrupt and the state. Like John Lennon says, "no country to die for". It's just about people man. Fuck the state. Fuck your borders bullshit.
It's really cringe and almost everyone does it. Most speeches at the start of an election campaign begin this way, also for liberals. When K. Harris said "We're America and we're the only country, where I, a black woman ™, could ever run for office..."
Like, look around. There are women, black people, and black women in office right now around the world. And that's coming from the more "" "" left "" "" side.
This is why I'm always confused when people get upset with me for not being "patriotic" or whatever. The state and country I'm born in is just dirt surrounded by water. I could not care less about it. It's just where my mom plopped me out at. Everything else is arbitrary nonsense.
I agree with this 100© but Netanyahu would call this line of thinking anti-Semitism
And I call him a cunt
Along with anybody who thinks an invisible sky-daddy has "chosen" them
it's tribalism, and I hate to say it because people throw this phrase around too much but I genuinely believe it's low IQ behavior
It is
It's very easy to see who clings to this sort of shit
It's people who have achieved nothing of actual value
I also want to emphasize that I don't mean "community tribalism" as in social support groups, but more so "them vs us" world view, the exclusiveness aspect
Eat shit Lee Greenwood and go fuck yourself.
There is a utility in having some national pride, in the same way as there is in having some pride in your place of residence. If you feel some pride for your home, you are more likely to invest time and resources in caring for and improving it. If you don't care about your home you are unlikely to put any effort into taking care of it.
Nothing is quite as long-term damaging to a nation as convincing its own people to think poorly of it.
Personally I think a fair amount of the damage that the US is doing to itself now is a result of foreign influence campaigns repeatedly targeting the US's worst international blunders. These criticisms are valid and true, but they are not the entire truth and the selective lense is intentional.
A common response to self-loathing is a defensive, reactionary display of narcissism.
An alternative view is that National Pride reduces people's pressure to improve their country and especially reduces the pressure they put on the elites leading the country to improve it.
Certainly were I was born - Portugal - the peak time of celebrating the past glories of the country (basically, the stuff that happened during the age of maritime discovery) was during the Fascist Dictatorship, when the country was in such a bad state that it received Food Aid from the rest of Europe.
My own experience living in Britain also adds up to this impression: the people there who were most loudly proud of the country and its past where those doing the most to destroy it with Brexit.
A very similar effect is visible in the US - those who are loudest at harping about the greatness of the country are those helping the present day elites pillage it, de facto bringing it down (there is no such thing anymore as The American Dream).
In my experience National Pride isn't an incentive to do better, it's the very opposite.
Understanding nationalism from a left perspective requires that we understand what a nation is. In Marxist theory, a nation is a "historically constituted, stable community of people, formed on the basis of a common language, territory, economic life, and psychological make-up manifested in a common culture." Nationalist movements are therefore struggles for sovereignty. Nationalism must be understood from its relation as a nation. Nationalism of oppressor nations and nationalism of oppressed nations are both struggles for sovereignty, the core difference being that oppressor nations have already gained the ability to determine their own future, and this progressive movement turns into its opposite, supremacy.
This is why we can say that the nationalist movements in Palestine, Ireland, indigenous Americans, and so forth are undoubtedly progressive in gaining that right to self-determination. This is also why we can say that Euro-American nationalism is a supremacist ideology. This is why nationalism can be difficult to understand in relation to internationalism, but the simple truth is that an internationalist stance requires the right of self-determination for all nations. This is the bedrock of internationalism and a greater international human identity. It isn't an erasure of culture and national identity, but a celebration of all of them.
TL;DR: nationalist movements in oppressed nations like Palestine good, nationalist movements in oppressor nations like the US bad.
Have you ever been to a cultural parade, even when you're not part of that culture? They are so fun, especially if you're only being accepted as the culture for a day or so. Some cultures are much more family oriented too, so they're going to understand each other and rise above most things together. I get it.
When people have nothing to be proud of they will take anything they can get
This is true but it also makes sense why youwould wanna be patriotic(not nationalistic, important distinction). Youre born somewhere, and you dont have a choice in that, but you still grow up with people arround you who have a certain culture, who raise you, who youre freinds with. You can associate with them and try to improve your community without pushing down others. I think this is the concept patriotism is based on. Also i never get these posts, do these people truly not understand how a racist, or a nationalists mind works? The same way you should be able to put yourself into the shoes of someone recieving hate, you should be able to see from the perepective of the one hating on others. I guess that explains why there are so many asinine approaches to politics from both sides. Dont get me wrong, i hate the right, but the reason theyre outplaying us is because they can see from our perspectives better than we can see from theirs, which is very dissapointing when we should be the empathetic left. Something might not make sense but you should still understand how someone gets to that conclusion, especially since i have a pretty big problem with this specific qoute. Two of these groups, irish and italian, have recieved a lot of discrimination. Wouldnt you be proud of who you are if they discriminated against you, wouldnt you fight back? Its the same with being queer, its not a choice, thats exactly what were trying to communicate to the right, yet you have pride for the exact same reason italian and irish americans have pride, to show you are here. This qoute is basically this guys sufferring, or hate or something similar packaged in a way that makes it look smart instead. And im not blaming the guy, something drove him to react this way.
Ahh, after reading hes irish american. See? He shouldnt be pride to be born irish, instead be proud of his people and himself for going through discrimination. Today this is much less of a thing but being born in 1937 couldnt have been easy in an irish immigrant family. Theres always more to the story is all im saying. Nuance, you know.
Then why are billionaires proud of their wealth when they were already born into it?
I think an American Indian who is proud of keeping their cultural identity alive when countless others were lost to genocide has more right to pride than rich people who lord their meaningless "accomplishments" over others.
Because there is nothing special about them as an individual. I'd imagine they surround themselves with money to prop up their self-worth because people wouldn't pay attention to them otherwise. They are about as important as anyone else that isn't good at anything but much more significant because they have wealth. And they realize that.
Does that count for gay pride, though?
That's more about pride in being resilient, kind to others, and true to one's self in the face of discrimination, shame, and adversity.
People will apply this to something like gay pride, black pride, etc. But those forms of pride are about standing in opposition to prejudice, oppression, and hardship, where the inherent aspects of your existence are demonized, stereotyped, or seen as lesser. The pride is in making it through the world and accepting/celebrating yourself despite all the hate and dangers others force onto you.
Having pride in being part of a marginalized group isnt about feeling superior to other groups. It is about rebelling against those who feel themselves superior to you.
For me, that's the différence between a nationalist and a patriot: the nationalist thinks their country is the best, the patriot wants the best for their country. A patriot will see the flaws in the system and will try to correct them for the benefit of the community. A patriot will be happy when other people will want to join the community to make it better, or to change it. A patriot is happy when the community evolves, and will work for it. A patriot can be a foreigner initially. Doesn't change anything. The nationalist cannot accept change. Therefore, they don't accept anything that can make their community evolve. They don't realize their country changed in the past, they idealize a vision completely unbalanced of history and cannot see the flaws in the system.
Unfortunately today, the patriot is a nuisance and the nationalist a useful tool for the nefarious people which wants just more power and more money.
It's easy to sell something to someone who thinks nothing should change, it's hard to contempt someone who wants to change a system.
While i agree, many people are proud of their genetics, or their team, or or or
I don't really get the "being proud of our history" part. Some other people did it and it's not your achievement in any way. But I do get enjoying your rich historical and cultural heritage in the form of museums, archeological sites and cultural events.
For example, as a dual national, I never liked the polish Christian traditions which are all about martyrology and are mostly sad and boring but I do enjoy Spanish traditions which are mostly about just having fan. Spain also has richer history with traditions, language and cuisine spanning way more different cultures. I wouldn't say I'm proud of it but I do enjoy it.
I do enjoy Spanish traditions which are mostly about just having fan.
Fun or flan or both?
You can develop a sincere love for the people of your nation as countrymen. I don't understand it passed that.
Pride is the wrong word. You are grateful to be born into a certain country like you are grateful to not have a predisposition for cancer