this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2026
20 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

12238 readers
675 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


🌐 Other Relevant Communities


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A US law enforcement officer made a typo when they noted a username involved in child luring. The incorrect username was traced to a Nova Scotia man, who was charged and found guilty, solely on the basis of the incorrect username.

The guy, Brandon Klayme, ended up spending 18 months in jail due to the typo. The incorrect username was enough to get the guy convicted and jailed.

I'm surprised this hasn't been a bigger story.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The ars technica coverage does a better job of describing what happened.

[–] streetfestival@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago

Agreed. If you read only one article, read Ars Technica for parsimony. The PostMedia version (main link) is more ragebait-y. It's a pretty chilling tale of someone being convicted due to a typo made during the investigation when no actual evidence against him was found (before or after the typo was caught)

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

I'm still left scratching my head here. What a nightmare. A child lurer remained on the loose while an innocent man was in jail convicted of possessing child pornography. Is this case why his lawyer is no longer practising law? Is the judge that sentenced him mortified? It's such a failure.

[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Like, how was he even convicted? The only evidence they has was a kik account name. They didn't have messages, they didn't have other info on his computer, nothing. Where is proof beyond a reasonable doubt?!

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

That's what I find so shocking. There was literally nothing incriminating other than the username.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Very bad case of broken telephone. But really on the whole, the most concerning thing is that there was no real world evidence linking Brandon to the crime yet he was tried, convicted and jailed for 18 months.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

Agreed. I'm surprised a judge thought the IP address was enough evidence to convict him.