this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2026
154 points (98.1% liked)

Global News

6741 readers
384 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title. If you don't like the title of article, look for an alternative source instead of editorializing it.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title. Opinion articles refer to articles that their publisher doesn't explictly endorse.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) if the news is from a local publisher who doesn't clearly mention the country.


Rules

This community is moderated in accordance with the principles outlined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which emphasizes the right to freedom of opinion and expression. In addition to this foundational principle, we have some additional rules to ensure a respectful and constructive environment for all users.

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation. Any kind of discrimination is will not be tolerated.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

New York (AFP) – FIFA has banned fans from bringing refillable water bottles into World Cup venues in a last-minute policy change that will force thirsty supporters to pay for bottled water, The Athletic reported on Wednesday.

As recently as last month, FIFA's official stadium code of conduct included a clause which read: "For the avoidance of doubt, empty, transparent, reusable plastic bottles, up to (1 liter in) capacity, may be brought into the Stadium."

However The Athletic reported on Wednesday that those guidelines had now been tweaked to explicitly ban refillable bottles.

"For the avoidance of doubt, reusable water bottles may not be brought into the stadium," an updated stadium code of conduct read.

In a statement to AFP, a FIFA spokesperson said the rule change was taken on safety grounds, noting that several World Cup venues already barred the use of refillable water bottles.

"FIFA is committed to protecting the health and safety of all players, referees, fans, volunteers, and staff," the statement read.

"FIFA made the decision to prohibit bottles to prevent risk and injury to players and attendees.

"Outside bottles are already prohibited at several of these venues for safety considerations, and FIFA is applying this consideration across its tournament stadiums."

The statement added that misting stations, fans, hydration stations and cooling tents would be available in "the stadium footprint".

It added that bottled water inside the venue would be sold at prices which "remain consistent with other events held at each stadium."

The rule change comes despite experts warning fans could face health risks from extreme heat at open-air venues during the World Cup, which is being co-hosted by the United States, Canada and Mexico.

A report published by the World Weather Attribution research group last month estimated that 26 of 104 games at the World Cup are likely to be played in conditions where the Wet Bulb Global Temperature (WBGT) exceeds 26 degrees.

WBGT is a measure of heat stress on the human body which combines temperature, humidity, wind and sunlight.

At last year's FIFA Club World Cup in the United States, where fans complained of searing temperatures, supporters were also barred from bringing water bottles into venues.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 65 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just one more grift to add to the pile.

How long before they charge for each breath?

[–] myrmidex@belgae.social 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

$20 per Ole chanted, $50 to participate in a Mexican wave. A thousand to curse at the referee.

It's as if the upper class no longer understands the purpose of panem et circenses, they even want to keep that to themselves.

[–] First_Thunder@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago

Wait did you say Mexican? DEPORTED

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Is the mexican wave different than the regular wave?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world 4 points 1 month ago

$50 to find out (spoiler: it isn't)

[–] myrmidex@belgae.social 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

hmmm I know it as the mexican wave because it was a thing at the Mexico world cup where my country did reasonably well, thus enshrined forever in the collective memory. Perhaps for other countries it's indeed known as the wave, I had no idea. TIL :)

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Since I was a kid in the 80s, in the US, we always did this at baseball games, and it was always just called the wave.

I wonder if maybe it was originally a North American thing, and was only exposed to fans on a world level through a more international sport like soccer football through an event hosted in Mexico. Though that seems weird too because it’s such a simple concept I would expect it to predate the Roman coliseum.

[–] myrmidex@belgae.social 3 points 1 month ago

Ah yes, seems it's exactly as you say: it existed before the world cup, but that drove its international popularity.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_(audience)#1986_FIFA_World_Cup_in_Mexico

[–] albbi@piefed.ca 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sports could make so much money charging $1k to yell at the referee after the game. Charge $100k to go right down to the pitch to yell at them during the game. And then you can get a company to sponsor the curse break.

[–] myrmidex@belgae.social 3 points 1 month ago

Hell yea! Would solve a lot of money problems for amateur and youth clubs too!

[–] MeThisGuy@feddit.nl 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

how much to blow my vuvuzela?

[–] myrmidex@belgae.social 1 points 1 month ago

No, I dont do that sort of stuff 😄

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

That was never free.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

20 bucks is 20 bucks

[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

You'll get thrown out for racist talk like that...

Also, how much does it cost to have a massive flat that when deployed obscures the view of lots of people??

[–] stumu415@lemmy.zip 40 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Fuck FIFA.

In my European home country, the usual excitement for the world cup, is not there at all. Except the die hards, no one is barely talking about it.

[–] Spitefire@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Going to a World Cup game was on my bucket list all through my young adulthood. Now there's going to be matches a 90 minute train ride from my house and I never even considered buying a ticket. I'm going to go to a Banana Ball game instead...

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

All big sports have been enshittified to the point they suck. The worst auto racing experience you could have is a F1 race today, they herd you like cattle to net an experience far worse than TV.

[–] NotFrenchJack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

This is a mix of you growing up with a hint of nostalgia, and the death of the TV.

Excitement for the world cup is waning, just like it's waning for any other event/show that collected the family in front of the small screen.

The quality of game itself has always been not good at the international level. And that probably increased with players playing in many different leagues, not just teams. While decades ago, you had some cores of teams playing for the same club.

The game itself changed of course. No more no.10 artists giving you a good show.

In my extended family, most people who care about the world cup are people who don't watch the sport much during the regular season. So it's not really primarily a sporting event for them.

I would love it if it was a moral awakening, or increased awareness of the hubris that is the modern nation state identity, that is driving this. But I genuinely doubt it. And if you think it is now, or was in Qatar (the biggest moral posturing maxxing event in internet history) or Russia, I'm afraid you're probably over-influenced by your echo chamber of choice.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Same here, but in Canada where some of the games are happening. Used to be a parade of flags on cars but that's gone, no one is buying the scalper tickets (which is supposed to be illegal) or the pricey hotels.

I think even football fans are sick of FIFA's bullshit.

[–] mech@feddit.org 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

HAHAHA get fucked.

How long until they ban bringing flags and sell them at the entrance?

[–] cmbabul@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well now that you’ve said it out loud

[–] Corngood@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

No outside shirts. You must wear a shirt beyond this point. Here is a kiosk where you may buy shirts.

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And you thought FIFA had hit rock bottom with the fake “peace prize”.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sepp Blatter is a Trumpian piece of shit. He ruined the sport.

[–] seejur@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Wasn't the peace prize from Infantino? He has the remarkable achievement of managing to be even worse than Blatter

[–] uhmbah@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 month ago

Ya, do this search, "nestle Fifa 2026"

Fucok nestle.

[–] RegularJoe@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So can you bring your own non-refillable bottles?

[–] Decq@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Isn't every bottle refillable? I don't get why this specification is required.. Sounds like an unnecessary use of pleonasm.

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I had this argument with an airport security person. I had my toiletries in a bag that I had knotted shut, She told me it needed to be in a resealable bag. So u untied the knot and redid it.

She then was irritated and directed me to a machine that sold one pound ziplock bags. So I trashed my toothpaste and got on with my day.

So when dealing with power tripping people, the re- moniker seems not as hewn in stone.

[–] Decq@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (6 children)

You could have gone one further and discuss whether toothpaste is actually a liquid or not. It's a paste, or more specifically a Bingham plastic.

But that probably would go way above their mental capabilities if they already don't understand what resealable means.

[–] mech@feddit.org 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Airport security doesn't follow definitions of physics, they follow their list of rules.
And in those rules, toothpaste is a liquid.

[–] Decq@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I looked it up, and no in their rules toothpaste is not a liquid. But pastes, gels, creams and aerosols aren't allowed either. So yes the toothpaste argument wouldn't hold.

But the resealable bag argument still stands. They also only need to fit in it, not have to be in it (the bag is only to facilitate screening, not a requirement). So if it was just toothpaste the whole bag wasn't necessary to begin with.

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Good one, and I may use that if I wasn't in a rush hour queue with people wanting to be on their way.

Sometime I wish I had the time and money to push trivial things like these to a court hearing.

On the other I hate how some very rich people do stuff like that not out of principe but just sue to save a couple of bucks.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] laut_sprecher@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago

someone reading the small print

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

Why is anyone going to the World Cup??? I feel like we should be gathering information on the people going there, no not the immigrants.

[–] Tess@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I sense a revival of the waterskin!

[–] dellish@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

A Camelbak is not a bottle, correct?

[–] relativelyrobin@mander.xyz 6 points 1 month ago

Disability issue. Some people need special bottles. Money getting in the way of access, again.

[–] MushuChupacabra@piefed.world 6 points 1 month ago

I'm going to get around this by ignoring the tournament.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Just mug them on the way in, you cowards.

If you're not doing pig-butchering scams on your customers you might as well run a charity!

[–] FalschgeldFurkan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

At least the doubt has been avoided

load more comments
view more: next ›