this post was submitted on 16 May 2026
315 points (99.7% liked)

politics

29889 readers
2280 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Basically, the wild policy churn we see is designed to enable insider trading profits rather than benefit the country

top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 127 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No one is actually astonished, unless they’ve been in a coma for the last ten years.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 42 points 1 week ago

"It's called the American Dream because you have to be asleep to believe it"

  • George Carlin
[–] Seaguy05@lemmy.world 74 points 1 week ago (6 children)

And that's just him. Imagine what the rest of his family is doing. Total scumbags... However... It's not illegal, they all do it. I'd be happy to see officials make it illegal and not just frowned upon.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Legal, illegal, doesn't matter. When you are a rich pedophile they let you do it.

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

Grab em by the pussy

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago

Us poor people treat fines, charges, lawyers and court proceedings as deterrents against doing certain things ... especially if they are illegal.

Rich people treat fines, charges, lawyers and court proceedings as the cost of doing business ... and it doesn't matter if its legal or illegal to them ... they just throw money at everything and they don't care if it's right or wrong or moral or immoral.

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

I would hesitate long and hard before assuming Trump is not doing anything illegal.

[–] ynthrepic@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Insider trading is illegal.

[–] Seaguy05@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Yes true they're supposed to report any trading that might be non public info buuuuttt this whole administration is wonky illegal shit. And in this case .. we find it and I bet you absolutely nothing is going to change. What's he concerned about his polling numbers?

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And what real world consequences does that result in? If it's nought then the word illegal is meaningless nonsense.

[–] ynthrepic@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Sure, but what else is there?

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Any other judgment that doesn't involve laws that are not even worth the paper they're written on.

[–] ynthrepic@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Such as?

I can't think of a better institution than rule of law. The problem is all institutions rely on people to uphold them. Particularly, those in the positions of most power. Not just those with the guns.

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I can’t think of a better institution than rule of law

That's really sad

[–] ynthrepic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Family, friendship, libraries, science idk i could go on all day lmao

[–] ynthrepic@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

You've forgotten the context of the question. Those institutions don't maintain social order. They are maintained by social order.

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Of course they do, how many billions of people wake up early in order to take care of their families every day? That's not social order?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

they all do it.

No they don't. And definitely not to this extent. And especially not past presidents.

Stop acting like this shit is normal.

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It isn’t normal but it was only a matter of time. We keep NOT holding our leaders accountable for the things that ARE crimes. this was inevitable.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Congress does this all the time. Why do you think career politicians become so wealthy.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

They all do it? Who has done anything even close to this scale?

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 38 points 1 week ago (4 children)

The problem is not that these wealthy owners and political insiders are doing this ...

... the main problem is an entire country of complacent morons that allow it all to happen, passively support it, casually ignore it, pretend it isn't like that and vote accordingly to put these idiots or idiots like them back into power every single time.

[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 33 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Here are the complacent morons in which you refer:

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 6 points 1 week ago

They just want their team to win, even if it means they personally suffer.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago

I still can't get over the amount of open public support he gets from people in the US. It's like we are so fucking lazy that we just absorb whatever propaganda is blinking in front of us at the time.

Or maybe that's what I'm hoping is the case for most people rather than being well-informed true believers.

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

His followers have been trained to knee jerk it away.

If you ask them about it, they will just say “well pelosi made trades” etc

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

If you ask them about it, they will just say “well pelosi made trades” etc

You are correct of course. And the answer people with two braincells would give is

"Good we both agree its wrong, so let's hold them to account"

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Everyone whose been paying attention for the previous 16 years:

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 week ago

Well I mean, what else could we expect from the crime president?

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

ridiculous. over 55 trades per day. If you looked closer at timings, I'm sure there'd be plenty of reversals pre/after TACO events.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 week ago

This is just what he's admitted to. Someone is going to correlate these trades with announcements of tariffs or military operations, to see if they look like there was coordination in order to manipulate the markets.

But the trades that would show those patterns were conveniently left off the disclosure. Soon we'll hear that he didn't include everything, and he'll claim that he's a big important businessman, he has lots of trades that the rest of us losers wouldn't understand, and he forgot a few, no big deal. He disclosed 3700 trades, obviously he wasn't trying to hide anything.

Except the trades that prove his guilt.