this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
218 points (95.8% liked)

politics

29580 readers
2134 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just your daily reminder from Democrats that they suck.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 7 points 16 hours ago

Funny he thinks it's going to be up to him. He's just going to be another Congressional Rep, and someone else will be making the decisions. He's already had his shot, and he allowed MAGA to rise again and take back over. He's already proved he's too weak and cowardly to get the job done, it's time for someone else.

In fact, both Jeffries and Schmuck need to be investigated just like every MAGA. I'm not convinced that they aren't Manchurian MAGAs. They got a lotta splainin to do.

[–] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago

You have got to be fucking kidding me. That is quite literally the easiest and most free political slam dunk possible. These people have brain damage.

[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

I mean, like, if they impeach him successfully, they’d just get Vance as president, that would be arguably worse. Like, trump is an incompetent idiot, and he’s filled his administration with incompetent sycophants. Vance probably would clean house of the most incompetent people and pursue much of the same agenda, so, same ghoulish techno facism, but implemented faster and with less opportunities to block it in the courts due to sloppy implementation.

Never interrupt the enemy when they’re making a mistake and all that.

[–] brownsugga@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

It's all theater. The democrats are there to make normal people think there is someone "good" in the government. The only ones who actually change society meaningfully are the conservatives. This is because FDR passed the new deal to prevent a second civil war, and the owners of the US hated that so much that they've been walking back that shit for 100 years. Essentially, back in the "gilded age" working people were essentially slaves to the companies they worked for, paid in scrip only valid at company stores, forced to live in company housing. The working people started pushing back, with violence. The US government unsurprisingly put down these 'protests' working on behalf of the business interests. Before it could come to a head, FDR did the new deal, and wwii buttoned it all up. They've been trying to make everybody slaves again ever since, and they're pretty close now.

[–] mayabuttreeks@lemmy.ca 82 points 1 day ago

FYI for anyone in his district: Jeffries has a Democratic primary challenger this June — Vance Bostic, a working-class guy who as far as I can tell hasn't had a lot of press, but if you live in Brooklyn and are a registered Democrat it's probably worth checking him out.

[–] Jollyllama@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Does something special happen if we impeach him a third time?

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Does something happen if you do nothing?

[–] Yuccagnocchiyaki@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah. It shows that the current opposition party will always be against a national threat to democracy and pedophilic rapist.

It puts all of the blame solely on the party destroying everything and shows the democratic constituency that their votes matter.

I think I am growing to hate the worthless, centrists in this country even more everyday. How does one compromise with a rapist? With a pedophile? How do you compromise with a seditious traitor who sells our secrets to the highest bidder openly?

The fact we aren't in a war already shows that the country has already fallen and the Democrats aren't any way back to normalcy. They COMPROMISE with domestic terrorists that have killed science and education, farmers, cancer patients, children, etc.

WORTHLESS

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

If blue MAGA and neoliberals could read this, they'd be very upset!

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 13 hours ago

They don't read things that aren't from their lobbists and corporate owned "free press".

I was leaning toward, 'without winning the Senate its a waste of time when there are so many other pressing concerns.'

But no, you're right, they have to walk and chew pedo-gum at the same time. They have to take action against the ongoing national threat, and they have to move the country on from these people's dystopic vision of the US. Its a necessary part of the program.


It'd also have the tactical benefit of distracting from the WH regime's program, and allow political space for wavering Republicans to push back against certain excesses lessening the damage the WH is able to carry out from that point.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

A third opportunity to convict

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Nope. He just laughs and carries on.

[–] Dearth@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Am impeachment is just a trial. Unless the dens can get enough seats in the Senate that are willing to convict and remove trump an impeachment where Trump refuses all congressional subpoenas for him and the rest of the Epstein administration is meaningless.

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 67 points 1 day ago

Just count Jeffries and congressional Democrats out of everything. They’re determined to do nothing substantive with whatever power we give them, again. They’re a corporate donor maintenance organization, not a political party, not leaders, and certainly not advocates for any civic ideology other than whatever positions reinforce their ability to perform the above maintenance project.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

When asked if impeachment was a top priority, Jeffries said “of course not” during an appearance on “Fox News Sunday.”

He was on fox news when he said this; most likely, given the dems have already tried to impeach trump twice, he was trying to give the fascists a way to rationalize accepting dems winning the house. Besides this is a completely reasonable thing - unless dems win the senate too it shouldn't be the priority to do something completely pointless.

Ahh yes, the "let's not do our job, it's pointless" argument.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Looks like there are republican Democrats that need to be replaced as much as Republicans are.

Scratch a neo-liberal...

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 37 points 1 day ago

They're just determined to not win the majority, aren't they.

[–] Jaybird@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Voters say that re-electing Jeffries is not a top priority for them.

[–] Big_Boss_77@fedinsfw.app 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Then what in the fuck, pray tell, is?

[–] RaoulDuke85@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Israel needs more billions for their genocide.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 13 hours ago

By breaking federal laws and saying hands were tied.

[–] krisevol@lemmus.org 6 points 1 day ago

Trying to give money to "for profit companies" mandated by law again like Obama care

[–] Snowies@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Betraying America in service of plutocrats.

load more comments (3 replies)

Wow, so much for being the party of "Resistance." Tell me again how we can depend on the neo-liberals to not only do the right thing but also their jobs?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Jeffries has zero say what happens in the next congress. Just like Schumer

They've been lame ducks all but two weeks of this session, and they're not above saying dumb shit like this to try and get progressives to tune out of the primaries.

They're doing triage for the neoliberal faction

If you don't like them, vote in your Dem primary for the most progressive options.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] yenahmik@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The last 2 times just shows it's a waste of time until they have the votes in the Senate to convict and remove him from office.

[–] BertramDitore@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

It’s clearly on his mind, he’s been mentioning it out of nowhere lately. He doesn’t want to be impeached for a third time. Now you’re right it won’t actually do anything to the administration, but this is one of those times when the principle matters. It’s worth doing it because he deserves it and it would infuriate him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tronn4@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ayyyy any blue will do amirite?

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 1 points 18 hours ago

This would be more impactful if the whole last year hadn't happened...

[–] corbindallas@fedinsfw.app 5 points 1 day ago

piss drinking worthless human.

YOU ARE LITERALLY WORTHLESS

[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

they’ll get to it eventually; after they try to get 60 vote threshold votes and potentially succeed - low expectations here though

No you see it's 4d chess

They are lulling Trump into a false sense of security

[–] aarch0x40@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It’s meaningless anyhow if they don’t follow up with removing him from office. They’d be better off with their standard form strongly worded letter.

load more comments
view more: next ›