this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
590 points (97.9% liked)

Science Memes

20613 readers
1601 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 130 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Former situation: there is one electron

New situation: there are two electrons

[–] ignotum@lemmy.world 55 points 4 months ago

This is getting out of hand, now there are two of them!

[–] Rokin@leminal.space 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It also works for metaphysics. Reincarnation is real and there's only one soul, just bouncing around through all of time and space in an endless loop.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] fleem@piefed.zeromedia.vip 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

heck yes! been looking for this for like ten years now

thanks for the share

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 5 points 4 months ago

There is also an animated version by Kurzgesagt

https://youtu.be/h6fcK_fRYaI

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

That was a great read. TIL. ✨

[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 79 points 4 months ago
[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 76 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

"Wish granted. Electrons, being a human construct, have now always been defined slightly differently. Just as Franklin got the polarity wrong and you still use his labeling system, J.J. Thompson will now have fundamentally misunderstood the nature of the electron, leading to a cascading assumption by later scientists that the number of electrons in a neutral atom is one greater than the number of protons. Even though this completely breaks the math of quantum mechanics, everyone is just used to subtracting one at this point. This is a minutely worse world, but as a bonus, every physicist who sees you will now be preternaturally certain that you are personally to blame. You're welcome."

[–] Juice@midwest.social 35 points 4 months ago (2 children)

It is way too common to confuse the abstractions we use to understand reality with reality itself. Like the scientists who work with this stuff are really consistent in keeping the two separated, but the moment a theory gets in the hands of a journalist or god forbid a politician, it starts wreaking havok

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 26 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They're making the electrons gay!

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Never met a gay electron. They're always so damn negative.

[–] AlfalFaFail@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It is way too common to confuse the abstractions we use to understand reality with reality itself. Like the scientists who work with this stuff are really consistent in keeping the two separated

I wish this was true. I remember seeing a physicist talking about how the laws of physics are mathematical in nature and that the laws of physics needed to exist before the universe do the universe is made of math. I don't think the vast majority of physicists have a philosophical grounding for the types of ontological claims they make. Even less so since "shut up and calculate" became the professional axiom.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RiceMunk@sopuli.xyz 58 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Genie is being lazy and interprets that as: Add one electron to the universe, and attach it to any of the atoms available.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 32 points 4 months ago (2 children)

That's not Interpretation, that a whole different thing.

[–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

Add one extra electron to all the atoms in the universe -- adds one electron to all the atoms but not one each for each atom

Edit: typo,typo2

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 13 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Genie interprets as "every atom now shares this one extra electron"

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 42 points 4 months ago

I always liked the idea that the genie rules, when they're presented, are not laws/rules so much as hard physical limits. You can't wish for more wishes because the genie just doesn't have that much power. They're powerful, but they're not God with a capital G. The genie tries to add a electron to every atom in the universe. If fails and collapses with exhaustion before it's even finished adding one extra electron to every atom in your body.

[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 33 points 4 months ago

You’re always so negative …

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 25 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Can someone ELI5 what would happen?

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 37 points 4 months ago (6 children)

You know how when you put magnet faces together with the same polarity, they push against each other. If you squeeze them together they will pop away. When an atom has an extra electron, it makes its charge more negative. If all of the atoms have extra electrons, all of their charges will be more negative. Now imagine every single atom in the universe was suddenly the same polarity and began pushing all other atoms away. I'll let your imagination take over from there.

[–] Stupidmanager@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

For some reason you just explained the probability of the big bang. Some idiot made a wish, and poof, new universe.

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You've clearly never met a 5-year-old

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago (7 children)

Extra electrons make atoms go 'splodey.

[–] yabbadabaddon@lemmy.zip 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

When I was younger, I would often splodey too when thinking about Carmen electron

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Much better!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Oh, I see. I read it wrong at first. I thought it was saying add one electron total, I didn't realize it meant one to each atom. It makes a lot more sense now.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ElysianBladeRunner@piefed.social 17 points 4 months ago

Diabolical…..

[–] voodooattack@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

What if it’s one extra neutron? >.>

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.zip 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Or make every living thing deeply aware of each of their atoms at all times

[–] glibg10b@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's impossible. You'd need at least one neuron per atom, but each neuron has many atoms of its own

[–] Flyberius@hexbear.net 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] Scarry@hexbear.net 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] filcuk@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 months ago

Can I send this to the person reviewing my PR's

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 4 months ago

or add more antimatter(3% more) at the beginning of the universe

load more comments
view more: next ›