this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2026
534 points (95.4% liked)

Science Memes

19891 readers
1188 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JustAPenguin@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I have a BA in Mathematics. The limit is indeed determined by the direction you approach the limiting value.

When given without specification, the limit is implied to come from the left, meaning it increases towards the limiting value, which is why you see +inf.

[–] rooroo@feddit.org 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but then it should be negative infinite, cause if x<8 the fraction is negative.

[–] JustAPenguin@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ah, I misread the - as a +. You're correct! Sorry, I just woke up and am in the middle of my morning doomscrolling sesh

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 5 points 2 months ago

Conveniently modeled with the same limit.

Though I'm not sure what negative doom is and what happens when it approaches infinity.

[–] carmo55@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

This is just not true. The normal limit we have here means a limit would have to exist from both directions and they should be equal. They're not, so the limit doesn't exist.

One-sided limits would be denoted by x -> 5– and x -> 5+ or similar.

PS: in complex analysis, there is no distinction between +infty and -infty, so there it would be correct to say the function has limit infty at 5.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In my experience with maths, there's a whole bunch of different conventions all over the place, so it might've genuinely been how they were taught, even if you were taught differently...

[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 3 points 2 months ago

Yeah, that's my experience too. When we did this in school we always defined from which side we were approaching the function.

[–] JustAPenguin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

You're right. But in this case, which is the case I was referring to, there is no two sided limit. It is discontinuous. It is in this case which I was referring to. Sorry for not being clear.