comfy

joined 4 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

Reason number 5,386 to delete your Reddit account and encourage your friends & loved ones to do the same.

and incidentally, reason number 5,386 to make your online profiles hard to track down without actual active measures (like NSA attention).

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 64 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

[...] allegedly throwing an improvised incendiary device that ignited part of an exterior gate before fleeing the scene on foot.

The suspect was ultimately located about an hour later near OpenAI’s headquarters, roughly 4.8 kilometres (three miles) away, where he was allegedly threatening to set the building on fire.

ngl disappointing performance. If you're going to do an adventurism by yourself, which I generally don't advocate for tactical reasons, then at least make it worth the prison time.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago
[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago

Do diplomacy by shouting in public and assuming the message will reach your enemy.

You may not like it, but this is what peak transparency looks like

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Art of the Squeal

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Adblockers have been mentioned a hundred times, as they should.

Annual reminder to donate to Invidious too. YouTube has done some serious work to try and block most of the instances.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

What's been your favorite non-Abrahamic, non-local celebration?

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 17 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

On the other hand, if my workplace was on a list of announced missile targets, I'd stay away.

Assuming that there's no real chance of their enemy setting up a defense in time:

  • It reduces probability of civilian causalities (improves their international image, reduces incentives for affected people to join the fight against them)
  • If there is some failure in the attack and the center isn't disabled, they still reduced productivity. I'd say indefinitely
  • Tactic could theoretically be used to threaten or feint. For example, publicly list five target but only bother bombing three, and you get the benefits of scaring away people at the other two without spending weapons. This could also be used to manipulate enemy logistics, like moving their defenses or response teams to one place and then attacking another.
[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Reflecting on this, I think it's fair to consider the International Court of Justice (part of the UN) to be a legal system with legitimate jurisdiction over most countries - even if it's frequently unable to enforce its law. And therefore it's reasonable to describe a war as "illegal", wrt the UN.

But I do believe it's a pointless description - I can't think of any legal wars, especially if one believes committing war crimes makes even a UN-sanctioned war illegal. I consider it a propagandic description used to put spin on a war. (And just adding that on a personal level, I believe legality is irrelevant to morality and acceptability)

Retaliation is generally understood to be self defence, as a deterrent against further attacks.

While the statement may be true, I want to emphasize that a common tactic is for a country to harass or suppress another country until they retaliate, and claim that retaliation is in fact unprompted aggression which must be retaliated against. While there are notable cases of this in the past decade, this tactic is tried and true across centuries. Therefore, we often see wars where both sides claim self-defense, and both their blocs generally understand their side to be justified.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

Hopefully this one directly shoves the electons. I'm scared of society's DHMO dependency.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If this hypothesis is true, and it does sound plausible to me, it would be interesting to see what counter-analysis emerges, or even if citizens try to change their road address from King Street to Landfill Lane to avoid getting whacked.

 

This post already has more views than that entire page.

 

Most of us are familiar with what (your local equivalent of) $10 USD is worth, or $100 or perhaps even $1,000,000.

But larger amounts soon become unrelatable. And with the huge wealth inequality at play, it's easy to come across stories where something worth hundreds of millions was wasted.


  • How much money would it take, under our current systems, to solve various societal problems? (e.g. food shortages, infrastructure fixes, public health efforts, new transport)
  • How much did the achievements of various organizations cost?
  • What could individuals spend such money on? (luxuries, marketing)

And make sure to give evidence for your answers!

 

Yes, this instance is definitely the wrong place to ask, but maybe I'll be surprised.

I hate commercial ads. I consider them intolerable and violating. I'm far from alone in this perspective (see: famous Banksy quote, and subvertising + related cultures). It's one of the rawest forms of exploitative manipulation.

So surely you can understand my confusion whenever I see people just watching ads on their phone until they finish, or even watching ads on television until their show starts again. Come on, just do something else for 4 minutes (most channels run two 4 minute segments per half hour, that why your downloaded TV episodes are 22 minutes each instead of 30)

Is there a more meaningful answer than "laziness"?

 

I have a new note-taking system and I want to add some deboonks in there that I can quickdraw on a lib, any day, any time.

I don't want some self-satisfying /r/breadtube rot, I want the links you've actually sent to people when they say something silly.

Shoutout to the copypastas that Davel, Dessalines and Cowbee have developed.

 
 

I want to build a small site which acts as a broad, searchable FAQ for a certain topic.

Consider I have the FAQ:

What is the approximate mass of Earth?

It's 5.9722 × 10^24 kilograms, wow!

I want the user to have a chance at finding this FAQ by asking How heavy is our planet

Looking at this basically, the two similar questions have only one shared word, "is", which is an extremely common word. So using something really simple like word comparison or even stemming/lemmatization alone won't help.

On the very other end of the spectrum, a search engine's AI feature can interpret this effectively, rephrase the question and give a similar answer. So, what strategies are are in-between these two extremes?

  1. A few people will be adding questions to the site regularly.

  2. If possible, no external services, just self-hosting on an affordable server.

  3. Simpler and lighter solutions are preferred.

Are any of the features in OpenSearch (ElasticSearch/Lucene fork) able to do this? Is it overkill?

Since the site will have new questions to match regularly, will a solution require the repeated, wasteful retraining of NLP models to to create weights? Or is training so efficient for small-scale text datasets that it's responsible and reasonable to do on a cheap low-end server?


edit: Just spitballing here, I could try a solution which does the bulk work at insert-time rather than runtime, by asking a general pre-trained language model to rephrase the question many different ways, or generate keywords, then use those responses to generate tags for a basic keyword search to match. This would avoid making a heavy search function or retraining any model on the server.

Example result:

GPT-4o mini

Here’s a list of synonyms for the keywords in "What is the approximate mass of Earth?" formatted as an array of strings:

json

[
  "weight",
  "heaviness",
  "bulk",
  "load",
  "volume",
  "estimated",
  "rough",
  "approximal",
  "near",
  "close to",
  "planet Earth",
  "the globe",
  "the world",
  "Terra",
  "our planet"
]

 

Finding a wholesome community archive with tagging done well is a rare treat, so I think this place is worth a special mention.

 

The linked page has clips posted in a 2015 thread, along with links to the full détourned Aiura episodes most of the clips are from.

Fifteen are from Aiura, three are from The Devil Is a Part-Timer!, and one is from Eden of the East.

The how-to guide (although, being a decade later, there are probably now improved ways to do this)


Bonus: Inspired by those, a nukechan user made three Shrek 2 détournement clips:

 
 

PSA is a public service announcement, an awareness campaign.

It could be as simple as teaching everyone to walk on the same side of the footpath in each direction, to demonstrating how quickly a fire spreads and ways to prevent and react.

 

Alright, I'll save you from typing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_Epstein

view more: next ›