this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Comic Strips

23801 readers
7 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

Rules
  1. 😇 Be Nice!

    • Treat others with respect and dignity. Friendly banter is okay, as long as it is mutual; keyword: friendly.
  2. 🏘️ Community Standards

    • Comics should be a full story, from start to finish, in one post.
    • Posts should be safe and enjoyable by the majority of community members, both here on lemmy.world and other instances.
    • Any comic that would qualify as raunchy, lewd, or otherwise draw unwanted attention by nosy coworkers, spouses, or family members should be tagged as NSFW.
    • Moderators have final say on what and what does not qualify as appropriate. Use common sense, and if need be, err on the side of caution.
  3. 🧬 Keep it Real

    • Comics should be made and posted by real human beans, not by automated means like bots or AI. This is not the community for that sort of thing.
  4. 📽️ Credit Where Credit is Due

    • Comics should include the original attribution to the artist(s) involved, and be unmodified. Bonus points if you include a link back to their website. When in doubt, use a reverse image search to try to find the original version. Repeat offenders will have their posts removed, be temporarily banned from posting, or if all else fails, be permanently banned from posting.
    • Attributions include, but are not limited to, watermarks, links, or other text or imagery that artists add to their comics to use for identification purposes. If you find a comic without any such markings, it would be a good idea to see if you can find an original version. If one cannot be found, say so and ask the community for help!
  5. 📋 Post Formatting

    • Post an image, gallery, or link to a specific comic hosted on another site; e.g., the author's website.
    • Meta posts about the community should be tagged with [Meta] either at the beginning or the end of the post title.
    • When linking to a comic hosted on another site, ensure the link is to the comic itself and not just to the website; e.g.,
      ✅ Correct: https://xkcd.com/386/
      ❌ Incorrect: https://xkcd.com/
  6. 📬 Post Frequency/SPAM

    • Each user (regardless of instance) may post up to five (5 🖐) comics a day. This can be any combination of personal comics you have written yourself, or other author's comics. Any comics exceeding five (5 🖐) will be removed.
  7. 🏴‍☠️ Internationalization (i18n)

    • Non-English posts are welcome. Please tag the post title with the original language, and include an English translation in the body of the post; e.g.,
      Sí, por favor [Spanish/Español]
  8. 🍿 Moderation

    • We are human, just like most everybody else on Lemmy. If you feel a moderation decision was made in error, you are welcome to reach out to anybody on the moderation team for clarification. Keep in mind that moderation decisions may be final.
    • When reporting posts and/or comments, quote which rule is being broken, and why you feel it broke the rules.
Banned Artists

The following artists are banned from the community.

  1. Jago
  2. Stonetoss

It should be noted that when you make reports, it is your responsibility to provide rational reasoning why something should be removed. Saying it simply breaks community rules is not always good enough.

Web Accessibility

Note: This is not a rule, but a helpful suggestion.

When posting images, you should strive to add alt-text for screen readers to use to describe the image you're posting:

Another helpful thing to do is to provide a transcription of the text in your images, as well as brief descriptions of what's going on. (example)

Web of Links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1
Sealioning (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by ahlooolahhh@lemmy.world to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Other related argument techniques used on the internet (and elsewhere) often commingled with Sealioning:

Butwhataboutism is a pejorative for the strategy of responding to an accusation with a counter-accusation instead of a defense of the original accusation.

Also, ignoring the rebuttal and constantly shifting the attack to a tangentially related part of the discussion forcing the opponent to defend and rebut each new point, generally exhausting them and causing frustration and irritation.

JAQing off is a way of attempting to make wild accusations acceptable (and hopefully not legally actionable) by framing them as questions rather than statements.

Moving the Goalposts in which evidence presented in response to a specific claim is dismissed and some other (often greater) evidence is demanded. Closely related to butwhataboutism.

Appeal to Hypocrisy (tu quoque) basically tries to invalidate your opponent’s argument by using a “your side did it too, worse” and shift the argument to them defending themselves.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And don't forget the good old ad hominem, where instead of addressing any points, it attacks the one who made it in an attempt to intimidate the one making the point and applying peer pressure on others reading it to keep them away from that position.

Had someone use that on me earlier today lol. They aren't particularly effective on Lemmy, I've noticed. On Reddit, it depended on if they are for or against the popular circle jerk.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Important detail, regarding argumentum ad hominem (AAH): a lot of people incorrectly conflate the fallacy with insults, even if both things are independent. For example, let's say that someone said "the Moon is made of green cheese". Here are four possible answers:

Replies With insult Without insult
With AAH You're a bloody muppet, thus the Moon is made of rocks and dust. You're no astronomer, thus the Moon is made of rocks and dust.
Without AAH Yeah, because there's totally cheese orbiting Earth for a bazillion years, right? Bloody muppet. Cheese wouldn't be orbiting Earth for so long without spoiling.

This conflation between ad hominem and insults interacts really funny with sealioning. Sometimes you get the sea lion claiming that you're using AAH because you lost patience with its stupidity, but they're also prone to use non-insulting AAH.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

The insults never add anything useful to arguments and still appeal to the same basic things as insults alone, even if they are accompanied by logically sound arguments. And while they don't logically weaken a position, they can emotionally weaken it for those who recognize frustration reactions as a sign of weakness.

Rage and anger might feel powerful, but they actually betray a sense of a lack of control. Trolls take advantage of this because it's a sign they are getting to you. Plus it's rare that people respond to insults by agreeing with the one who insulted them and the times when they do usually involve an appeal to authority (where the insulter has authority to back up their position and challenging them can have consequences).

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

It's a clever method of trolling. But if you come prepared and/or are willing to put some effort in, you actually can wreck them with evidence and sound arguments that shuts them completely up.

This is very satisfying.

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sealioning is a type of trolling or harassment that consists of pursuing people with relentless requests for evidence, often tangential or previously addressed, while maintaining a pretense of civility and sincerity, and feigning ignorance of the subject matter.

Often the troll will just shift slightly and keep making demands regardless of evidence.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Don't let them dictate the convo. You can assert control as well, don't let them lead uncontested.

[–] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

What's your usual method of parry?

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

Remember the original discussion and don't take the bait to deviate. "We are not talking about X, we are talking about Y as originally posted by OP and I will not follow you down your rabbit hole."

[–] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

i don't answer questions (present thread excepted). i insist someone say plainly what it is they are getting at. and if they refuse that's that. if they persist in asking, i tell them not to be petulant. and if they present an argument, and it's sound, i usually just let that stand. if it's unsound, i let them know.

and, of course, one of the best ways is to never take a strong position yourself that can be sealioned.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social -1 points 2 years ago

It's easier said than done, but it can be done. The key is to unleash your inner troll and embrace the "u mad bro" while being

I recommend engaging once or twice in good faith, then hounding them to make a hard claim you can disprove. If they don't, start politely asking if there's any part they'd like to elaborate on while dropping implications they didn't read or understand what you said, and then asking about their beliefs on the topic.

It happened to me on Lemmy a while ago, I don't think the guy was actually a troll (I think he just didn't like what I had to say about the world bank and imf being the reason central and South America have stayed so poor despite incredible natural resources)

The dude got so mad he started going through my old posts and calling me a hypocrite. But he made a mistake, that was a hard claim - there was no contradiction in my beliefs and stance. I slapped him down a few times before realizing my posts from days ago were getting a lot of responses

Once I started recognizing the username and realized what happened, I started getting patronizing... It was oh so satisfying. I kind of wish he'd kept going for longer

I love reverse trolling trolls, all of the fun and none of the guilt

[–] thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's also frustrating because there are people who are sincerely trying to discuss in good faith while having a different opinion, which is camouflage for the sealion trolls.

Of course, people increasingly forget about the former group completely, and react with hostility... It's understandable, but unfortunate for healthy discussion.

At least in your case, your response is to lay out robust arguments to explain your position, which is productive regardless of whether they're trolling or sincere. I've learned a great deal over the years from strangers on the internet putting a clinic on someone who may or may not have been trolling.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

Accusing people of “sealioning” is a great way to not have to defend or discuss poorly thought out or sourced claims.

[–] half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

This is why we need seal clubbing

[–] KnightontheSun@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I don’t know. They stay out too late, get way too drunk and make a terrible racket when they get home.

[–] kinther@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Pardon me, I couldn't help but overhear...

Would you mind showing me evidence of any negative thing any sea lion has ever done to you?

I'm just curious if you have any sources to back up your opinion that seal lions need clubbing.