this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2025
92 points (96.0% liked)

News

37307 readers
3070 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 32 points 9 months ago

A sucker is born every minute

[–] INeedMana@piefed.zip 21 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And the crazy thing is, buying the rights might actually be a not so bad idea from marketing POV

[–] Shawdow194@fedia.io 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I was gonna say if they made it into an actual festival they are guaranteed turnout the first year

[–] crank0271@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Depending on your expectations, it is an actual festival. It's a little more along the lines of Survivor, though.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

So is Burning man and Coachella depending on the year, regardless heatstroke is guaranteed.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 14 points 9 months ago

Last I heard was something like “Fyre Festival 2 is real” lol

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 13 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Why would anyone want to own the rights to a scam?

And how come it is the people buying tickets we talk about but never the artist that canceled before it was set to happen? In neither of the completing documentaries, can I recall discussion of the artist supposedly set to perform but didn’t show up.

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

By the time the artists cancelled the disaster was already in full swing and there was no reasonable possibility of salvaging it. The artist cancelling at that point isn't doing anything wrong, they have been hired to do a job and they have a right to a safe and productive working environment. They're victims too, they're just less impacted because they are successful artists with millions of dollars who probably weren't relying on this job to pay for supplies or put food on their table.

Take the million-dollar artist out of the equation and imagine that you're an experienced gardener hired for a very generous sum to plant some decorative plants on this remote island. The organizers are going to advertise the quality of your work all around the world and get thousands of people to come pay to see your work. You're super of this recognition and opportunity, so you cancel all your other jobs in anticipation of being able to go do this fantastic job on a tropical island, your plane tickets are arranged everything seems great. Then you find out at the last minute that the area where they are building this garden is actually a health and safety hazard. Maybe they want you to plant azaleas on top of a nuclear waste dump. You decide fuck that and cancel. But the organization isn't even communicating anymore and you can't find anyone to notify properly, so not everyone even knows that you're not planning to show up.

Are you letting down the people who have paid to come see your plants? Sure. But based on what we know of the relationship, the gardener/artist has done nothing wrong. Their reaction is totally reasonable and they are not the crooks here, nor are they part of the problem, they were used. Unless we've got evidence to the contrary, they were misled just like the buyers were. Maybe they should've done more due diligence, but they're not having a great time either, they've had genuine losses (real and reputational). It's a big mess but they are not obligated to be a part of it and arguably if they did show up knowing their fans are being put in danger, isn't that actually worse?

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 3 points 9 months ago

I won’t dismiss what you have said. I was wondering more along the lines as to why more information from their side hasn’t been discussed. Do they have anything to say to McFarlane?

Because some idiot will definitely want to buy it

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Buy the rights, throw a small local festival, and people will be happy they got anything from fyre fest

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

I guess the expectations for Fyre Festival 3 are low!

[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago

OMG… really?

Old PT was right…

[–] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

In a few years there will be a whole new group of spoiled youth signing up for this ~~while they can't afford a home~~. Cue the new documentary season.

~~Where am I supposed to charge my backup Rivian?!~~