cecilkorik

Oh god no, the reason I use TUI is to get away from all this graphical rendering shit. What's wrong with ASCII art? If your TUI is too much for even bloated Unicode to handle, you've probably already wandered into the lands of the GUI and you should probably just be honest with yourself and stay there.

While it may not compare to the closed, corporate "frontier" models that are running each query on racks upon racks of servers worth millions of dollars in a corporate data center, it's not clear to me that's a reasonable comparison. Mistral is actually one of my personal favorite models and it has nothing to do with being French (although that is a huge bonus, it doesn't really contribute to my method of scoring and ranking of different models). It's simply more reliable and consistent than a lot of the other open-weight models, it follows directions well and has good task comprehension. Even with abliteration (guardrail removal) it doesn't generally have weird artifacts and it uses diverse, clear and reasonable language in its responses. It also handles Markdown really nicely in a very consistent way without needing guidance. To me, these are more important properties than simply "containing the most recent training data" or how many agents it has. At the end of the day I'm going to judge a model based on its output more than how it gets there and it turns out you don't need all the latest whiz-bang features to get acceptable output depending on what exactly you're doing with it.

It may not be as technically impressive as even the latest greatest open-weight models like Qwen, but it's still a great model whether it's French or not, and I would still use it just as often as I already do even if it were Chinese or North Korean or Russian I don't care, all that matters is that it's open-weight, runs with reasonable hardware requirements, is flexible in how it can be used, and produces good output. Mistral ticks all the boxes.

It's literally "internet advice" at your fingertips... but worse.

It'll be more like a civil war we'll get dragged into, I think. But either way, it's going to be absolutely brutal.

They're never going to attract the kind of talent or loyalty or qualifications they had previously, these people they're hiring now are going to be festering their corruption and incompetence around for decades. It really is remarkable how much damage Trump has done to the entire US civil service in such a short time. He has drained the swamp alright, by displacing it with toxic waste instead.

So the strait is open now? /s

Also, who wants to talk about all those Epstein files and all the times Trump is implicated in them? I know I do.

I can see the appeal of eschewing society as a whole in favor of a bot that I know won’t ask me my political or religious leanings and then tailor their behavior around my answer.

... tailoring their behavior around your answer is literally how LLMs work. That's why they're so sycophantic. Also unless you're running it locally on a machine you control, it doesn't need to ask you about your political or religious leanings anyway because it already knows. That's exactly the sort of context that data brokers have already long-since developed around your identity, and a commercial AI model is absolutely going to be looking at that kind of context to know exactly how to talk to you.

You are going the wrong direction if you think AI is the solution to any of these things at least in the way it is currently being used.

Casual smalltalk with randos is probably the cure. "Much less appealing" is the environment that's been intentionally created to prevent you from doing that. We're all in the same boat.

Tilley Endurables is a Canadian company that was owned by a company in the UK for awhile and is now back in Canada. They are famous for their hats, and they used to have a no-questions-asked, pretty much unqualified lifetime replacement guarantee on (some of) their clothes and actually challenged their customers to find ways to try to wreck them in actual use, with the washing instructions famously being "give them hell". But that's all been enshittified to the point that most of their stuff isn't guaranteed anymore and even the stuff that is, is effectively only guaranteed for meaningless "normal wear and tear and defects" nowadays. In my experience they're still pretty decent quality and very rugged, or at least they were when I last bought them. Although I don't have a ton of confidence that they've stayed that way or will continue to, they still seem to be from what I can tell.

Fire them all until they run out of worse people to replace them with.

Also better games. Graphics are not a substitute for gameplay, and I'm sorry to the "games as art" people but games are really about the latter not the former. If I wanted to look at beautiful renderings of fantastic and incredibly moving scenes, we have movies for that. That is not a requirement for a good game.

That's not athleticism, that's a different sport. I can beat marathon runners too when I use a bicycle.

Even if you were somehow able to overcome the "can" question, the far more meaningful question is "will it do so fairly", and it's absolutely certain it will not. If you agree the problem of the justice system is that rich people own it, this is not the solution to that problem. This literally is that problem.