this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
16 points (56.5% liked)

Comics

8325 readers
612 users here now

This is a community for everything comics related! A place for all comics fans.

Rules:

1- Do not violate lemmy.ml site-wide rules

2- Be civil.

3- If you are going to post NSFW content that doesn't violate the lemmy.ml site-wide rules, please mark it as NSFW and add a content warning (CW). This includes content that shows the killing of people and or animals, gore, content that talks about suicide or shows suicide, content that talks about sexual assault, etc. Please use your best judgement. We want to keep this space safe for all our comic lovers.

4- No Zionism or Hasbara apologia of any kind. We stand with Palestine 🇵🇸 . Zionists will be banned on sight.

5- The moderation team reserves the right to remove any post or comments that it deems a necessary for the well-being and safety of the members of this community, and same goes with temporarily or permanently banning any user.

Guidelines:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Solumbran@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

"Why care about other countries instead of focusing on our own" is often a manipulative way to say "let's allow xenophobia and sacrifice other nationalities to fuel our own".

And I'm sorry, but the guy in the last picture probably has it much easier than people going through the war in Ukraine.

[–] Confidant6198@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The USA shouldn’t be funding wars abroad when it’s own people are starving and homeless. This is not xenophobia. That is common sense. The USA shouldn’t be funding wars period, actually.

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 years ago

Lol fuck that. Nobody in a bad spot wants to hear that some underage minority prostitutes in some bigoted religious third world country have it worse. There is always someone who has it worse, in fact this is one of the most common deflections when the marginalized ask for (literal) change.

[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The bottomless wallet always opens up for war.

[–] match@pawb.social 2 points 2 years ago

because the money just goes from one pocket to the other

[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

tbh the same would be happening if they stopped funding ukraines defence and israels genocide. After all, helping poor people is communism!

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

If it was accurate the suited hand would be taking money out of the cup and sending a cop to arrest the homeless person. Then in the next panel the homeless person is convicted of some contrived bullshit and forced into a slave labor camp ran by the suited man who stole his money and locked him up.

[–] Hawanja@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

We should be giving billions to Ukraine. This is not a fair comparison.
We should be giving billions to end the homeless crisis. We can do both.

[–] Cnote5@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

https://nolaworkers.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/WarOverAll-768x776.jpg

Some things never change. I like the artwork. It's on point. And hits just as hard as this old cartoon from a century ago.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 1 points 2 years ago

Slight correction: they have billions to hand to private companies who then give a pittance to the poor and needy while naturally cutting a profit and exploiting every loophole and every opening to increase their profits and revenues, because something something corporate efficiency?

[–] Hydra_Fk@reddthat.com -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Missing frame is the government squeezing the cash out of the middle working class before tossing change to that poor man.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Hydra_Fk@reddthat.com -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So you agree that regulatory capture is the problem, cool I thought you were just going to post some links im not going to read.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

It’s not wrong to say regulatory capture is a problem, it just doesn’t go far enough. The US government was never not captured by the bourgeoisie, because the US was born of a bourgeois revolution[1]. The wealthy, white, male, land-owning, largely slave-owning Founding Fathers constructed a bourgeois state with “checks and balances” against the “tyranny of the majority”. It was never meant to represent the majority—the working class—and it never has, despite eventually allowing women and non-whites (at least those not disenfranchised by the carceral system) to vote. BBC: [Princeton & Northwestern] Study: US is an oligarchy, not a democracy

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

And comically large wheelbarrows of cash being delivered to billionaires