this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2026
214 points (99.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

16690 readers
1665 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ConstructiveVandalism@piefed.zip 58 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, didn’t they even watch the video before preparing their statement? This is the worst try of self defence possible

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What else could they come up with?

not saying anything would have been better

Something stupid like „we thought she had a gun“ or something. Don’t say it would be good. But every excuse would be better than this

[–] NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social 55 points 1 week ago (2 children)

the girl came right and we went a little left

Wild understatement:

The girl moved a barely percievable 1 inch right into the centre of the lane she was already driving straight forward in, the car drove up from behind, going much faster, and swerved diagonally across 2 whole lanes to intercept her.

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

1 inch is big okay?!!! also it's cold. Don't shame them!

[–] prostatitis@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

I was in the pool!

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago

"intercept"

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Of course it was a bunch of douche-bag chuds.

[–] CadMunt@aussie.zone 9 points 1 week ago

Everything about those guys says "watch your drinks ladies".

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

If course it's India so they'll probably win too.

[–] Sequence5666@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yikes. Another day, another reason for north Indian men to stay home and do housework.

Women in india are safer without them.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What on earth is that grammar in the article title?? I can't read it properly.

[–] destructdisc@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's standard news headline grammar as far as I'm aware

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I had another go and I understand it now, but bruh, it's pretty damn fucked. I hate headline grammar. It's so unnecessarily complicated. Sometimes they'll even make it LONGER for the sake of sounding like asshats in this way.

[–] Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 week ago

Can we just appreciate this being one of the few times a red circle actually helped clarify something.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's India, that woman is screwed

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Were they drunk? Or was she targeted for some reason? In the longer clip, they pull up alongside her on her left and appear to be taunting her. Then she pulls up ahead. They came up and drove into her, appearing to be deliberately, from the other side.

It's wild but I found myself wondering who's filming. At first I thought she had a drone, but it seems more likely, given the crash footage, that it's a mounted camera and for whatever reason you can't see the mount. Maybe you can and I didn't notice. Wild that we have tech like that. I also saw an Instagram logo somewhere on the bike. So they're not wrong, she films her rides and posts them. She may be some kind of influencer. Doesn't justify attempted murder. Amazing that they assumed people might think it does. Influencers are annoying, sure, but do any sane people really think they should just be murdered in the street? I sure don't.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

Or was she targeted for some reason?

She’s an unaccompanied woman in a religion-based fascist country.

[–] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 week ago

360 cameras usually leave out the mount. You can see that in a lot of extreme sports footage. I guess she is an influencer, but that's only relevant because of their ridiculous defense.

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That is a damn fine gimbal right there. It tracked with the action perfectly.

[–] comradegreetingcard@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago

Probably a 360 camera. Records in all directions and you edit the video to show the action.

[–] the_wizard_of_0Z@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

Cars are weapons. Drinking while shooting is dumb. Maybe one day when they are playing around sumtin will go off. Stupid is as stooooopid does. Thats what my mama always taught me. Watch out for the dum dums.

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hope these fuckers get fined for a lot

[–] atomicorange@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

Should be charged with attempted murder and jailed.