this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2026
1243 points (99.3% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

41964 readers
3574 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gigastasio@sh.itjust.works 105 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We’ve had a sign posted at work saying “We are proud to be a drug-free workplace. All new and current employees are subject to drug testing at any time.”

Not. Once. Not even when Jimmy came in to work each evening with the smell of weed wafting off of him. I could probably lay rails on my work table right in front of the security camera and hit one each hour and nothing would happen.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 89 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Sure, but that's not what the policies are for. If/when someone gets injured on the job the policy is standardly they require you to take a drug test then. If you fail you were breaking policy and the injury is deemed your fault, thus taking all responsibility of paying you workers comp off the table. Happens every day across the U.S. (that said I believe you can fight it, as you aren't always automatically eliminated if you fail the drug test, you will have an up hill battle though)

[–] turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I worked at a factory in the rural south the year (2022) they quietly did away with marijuana testing, even for spot violations. Turns out the standard reasoning, "the insurance company says," doesn't really matter... they didn't care and allowed a 9-panel to be used in all testing matters.

The unofficial reason I heard is, they go through the same workers on rotation, the good employees get hired back and forth. Drunks are chaotic, tweakers introduce drugs and are chaotic. Stoners are quiet and show up on time, and cause 0% of the fights, and tend to come with less of a rap sheet for terroristic threats and domestics.

They almost tripped over themselves to look the other way on my stonership...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SpacePanda@mander.xyz 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

For weed, get a medical card, if you can afford it. Usually even in recreational states you can get one and then they can't fire you for it.

Edit: Citation requested, this applies to some states in the us, but, not all.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] village604@adultswim.fan 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You can have a prescription for opiates too.

Doesn't make it OK to be high at a job where that impairment puts you and others in danger.

That being said, there's no test for THC that has a narrow enough time window to tell if someone is currently intoxicated. Blood tests are the closest at 6h, but blood levels aren't correlated with intoxication.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] QualifiedKitten@discuss.online 6 points 1 week ago (14 children)

I live in a state with recreational marijuana, but my current employer's policies specifically prohibit even medical marijuana, and I had to do a pre-employment drug test. Looking for a better job, but I've exhausted unemployment and all my savings, so it pays the bills for now.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Impleader@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

“Drug-free workplace” policy language is also a requirement for a lot of government contracts in the US

[–] restingOface@quokk.au 92 points 1 week ago
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 68 points 1 week ago (5 children)

America: big on winning wars.

…Lost the war on terror to terror.

…Lost the war on drugs to drugs.

[–] loaf@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To be fair, America initially lost the war on terror, then switched sides, so they’re technically winning.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 25 points 1 week ago (3 children)

We were doing terrorism long before 9/11

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 17 points 1 week ago

Because their leaders are idiots who think attacking the symptom will eliminate the cause.

[–] ChilledPeppers@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago

And Vietnam. And Iraq. And Afghanistan. And koreas. The US is just terrible at war tbh.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 10 points 1 week ago

Abstract concepts dont tend to have the capacity for surrender, after all.

[–] KingGordon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Losing the war in Iran.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 58 points 1 week ago (6 children)

How is it possible that 'companies can't find enough workers' but it takes more applications than ever to find a job? Something doesn't fucking add up

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago

The pay is what doesn't add up

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 week ago

They can't find enought workers that will accept shit pay and 0 benefits, but they don't like saying that.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

AI sucks at screening. But everyone is doing it.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

For us it's an issue with marketing the position in a manner thay doesn't result in 5,000 automated applications from an Indian headhunter firm that blindly clicks everything.

I've had a job opening at my city for weeks that pays higher than any other city in the state does for the same position, and we've had a grand total of one applicant who wasn't qualified.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tiral@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Well there actually isn't anyone looking at the applications! That would cost someone $20 a hour!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eurodyne@piefed.world 33 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (38 children)

I am 47, and I have never not once been tested for drugs for work.

For most of my jobs, I’m relatively certain that drugs were in fact required.

If anyone tried to test me for drugs, I would tell them to go fuck themselves, and I’d happily walk away from the interview.

[–] Ironrod@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm 36 and have been drugs tested once. They reckoned they'd seen me drop a gram of coke on camera so I got 6 weeks paid holiday.

[–] eurodyne@piefed.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Obviously, because nobody oopsie-daisies a gram of coke without going back to grab it, lol.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I have been drug tested several times, and I am in fact "on drugs". So, I get a call within a couple of days of getting tested to provide them with access to my pharmacy records to prove they are legally prescribed.
So, wtf were they doing that you got 6 weeks?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] motoxjake@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Yeah, most restaurants dont test for drugs for a reason.

On the flip side, I've had to take a drug test for every single job I've ever had. Most are sales related. But I travel for work so I kind of understand the need 10 years ago when everything was illegal. Now that weed is mostly legal everywhere its pointless to even test for it.

[–] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

I work with a vulnerable population. In addition to every job doing piss testing my fingerprints and DNA get recorded and checked against unsolved assaults / murders. Nothing ever comes up but I always worry I'm gonna be like the last person that touched a vase before the dude that bashed somebody's head in with it and the dude who did it isn't in any databases and I'm gonna have to answer a bunch of intrusive questions.

[–] eurodyne@piefed.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If I wanna buy blow in whatever city I’m visiting, I always ask a bartender or a waiter for a hook up.

It’s a rule I refer to as “industry standard”

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheRagingGeek@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Anytime I have worked for fintech I’ve been tested and fully background checked every time, pretty annoying but the trade off is the pay I suppose

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"No coke in this guy's system, rejected."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Devial@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I live in Germany, and over here unless your employer can present a damn good safety critical reason for why you must be sober at work (e.g. operating heavy machinery) it's not even legal to randomly drug test employees.

For your standard office job, or McDonalds cashier, or even high level office positions it would all be illegal for the employer to (randomly) drug test you.

As long as you're not operating dangerous machinery, it's none of your employers business what you do off the clock at home, even if that's consuming illegal drugs. They can (obviously) ban you from being high at work, but they would reasonable suspicion to accuse of you violating that, and potentially trigger a test (which means effectively the thing that is banned is for your performance at work to be impaired by drugs. If you work equally well high as sober, and don't reek of weed when you walk in, you can pretty much just work high without risk of much consequences)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (35 replies)
[–] peacepath@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (2 children)

War on drugs do not aim at reducing drug trasfic nor drug use. We all know it has never been effective anywhere for any drug.

We also know that treating drug as a medical problem is the best way to reduce both use and traffic.

War on drugs are just a way to force dealers to become more professional, and avoid “freelance” ones. War on drugs are a pure win for drugs, from their start.

[–] Varpeggio@lemmy.zip 23 points 1 week ago (3 children)

And to feed the prison industrial complex, of course.

[–] peacepath@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

workers at the charge of public expenses, working for the benefits of private companies 😍

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I see it as a direct continuation of:

Slavery->Sharecropping and Jim Crow->mass incarceration

Slavery never ended. The name just changed to be more polite, with a fig leaf of freedom and free will. Additionally we realized two things:

  1. It's more economical to hold slaves in large central facilities than dispersed.

  2. The best way to fight abolitionism is to convince the populace that the slaves deserve it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

"I have to hire a great work force to compete with those cyber criminals and some of those kids want to smoke weed on the way to the interview," - James Comey as FBI director.

[–] likebudda@reddthat.com 18 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I was a regular dabber for years when I quit cold turkey in anticipation of drug tests during job applications. I was completely sober for 8 months and when I got hired without a drug test I was so mad. I was expecting more drastic changes during sobriety but the only thing I noticed was the return of dreams. I hadn't really noticed their absence during my decades of cannabis use but while sober they were much more vivid and outlandish than I remember them being. They've since disappeared again once I resumed dabbing shortly after starting work.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I quit vaping wax recently because I was tired of goldfish brain and, on top of my memory returning, the most noticeable shift was the return of dreams.

I actually dreamed that I ate an edible and freaked out, only to realize I was in a dream. It's the closest I've come to lucid dreaming in a very long time.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jonesey71@lemmus.org 11 points 1 week ago

War on Drugs: Drugs win.

War on Poverty: Poverty wins.

War on Terrorism: USA and Israel join Terrorism.

[–] Naive@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Where I live, they already had frozen hirings.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My company is hiring and I don't think we drug test at all. If anybody in Los Angeles wants to make sheet metal, PM me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 8 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I'm a medical provider at a university hospital. They have a drug testing policy, but they have only ever utilized it for staff, not faculty members. I've worked in my clinic for more than ten years and have never been drug tested.

Pretty sure the hospital administrators really don't want to know if any of their physicians have any bad habits. It's kinda a lose lose situation for the hospital, and it's pretty well known that our field has substance abuse issues.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Lexam@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yet the actual unemployment in America is around 24%, so how hard are they looking? Or is it they're just stopping because they know it's a waste of money?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] goodboyjojo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yeah this is a good thing. I wish drugs were decriminalized and treated as a health epidemic.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›