this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2026
403 points (99.5% liked)

deflock.me

604 readers
200 users here now

Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) are AI-powered cameras that capture and analyze images of all passing vehicles, storing details like your car’s location, date, and time. They also capture your car’s make, model, color, and identifying features such as dents, roof racks, and bumper stickers, often turning these into searchable data points. These cameras collect data on millions of vehicles—regardless of whether the driver is suspected of a crime. While these systems can be useful for tracking stolen cars or wanted individuals, they are mostly used to track the movements of innocent people.

Learn more at deflock.me

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Crossposted from https://slrpnk.net/post/42283411

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. – Bernalillo County Sheriff’s deputies took a man into custody Wednesday after he showed up outside their headquarters with multiple Flock cameras in the back of his pickup truck.

Authorities arrested Jevon Martinez for damaging Flock cameras in Rio Rancho in May. Then, Wednesday, he posted video on social media appearing to show him driving around Albuquerque and taking down automated license plate readers once again.

In those videos, he comments that since the Bernalillo County Sheriff’s Office ended its contract with Flock last month, those cameras should no longer be out on the streets.

"Just for the record, I am not stealing these. I am not destroying them. I am simply returning them to the Bernalillo County Sheriff’s Department,” he said in one video.

top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 109 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The defense attorney should explain why these are a fascist violation of all of our rights.

You know, so that they're all well informed before they decide whether or not to convict.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 91 points 1 month ago

Just returning them. Awesome. 🤣

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 71 points 1 month ago
[–] TheEEEdiot@sh.itjust.works 57 points 1 month ago
[–] artyom@piefed.social 45 points 1 month ago (3 children)

They don't belong to the Sheriff's dept...

Hopefully he gets a slap on the wrist.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

There's no intent to permanently deprive if you literally take something to the authorities for disposition which is a key plank of theft. Not criminal mischief if they're not damaged either.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I appreciate this kinda armchair lawyering. I aspire to speak this confidently about things I have an approximate knowledge of.

[–] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ya this is on par with saying I wasn't shoplifting I was going to take it home to make sure it works then return it to the store because I am such a good samaritan.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Why do you folks think that joyriding and grand theft auto are different statutes? Mens rea in theft is very important and it has to have an intent to deprive. A jury wouldn't believe your example, but this dude actually DID bring them to the sheriff. You could argue civil tresspass to chattels or some local level minor property charge for unauthorized use if they didn't think they were depriving someone of their property. But it's not theft.

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago

A jury would go for it I bet.

[–] degen@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago

How can she slap?

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

I hope they don't bother to prosecute the case.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 month ago

Tax payer dollars, tax payer property.

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

He was just picking up the ones that randomly fell over due to shoddy materials. He should be applauded for picking up so much litter.

[–] ianept@thelemmy.club 19 points 1 month ago

A true patriot

[–] MoonRaven@feddit.nl 19 points 1 month ago

I'm pretty sure I was in the pub with him at the time...

[–] Boozilla@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 month ago

Breaking Good

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 15 points 1 month ago

what cameras, hes collecting them like e-bikes and e-scooters.

[–] magikmw@piefed.social 15 points 1 month ago

Plot twist: he's a flock contractor on a job.

[–] answersplease77@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Is there a GoFundMe link for him? He needs to bail out and lawyer up

[–] Pandantic@midwest.social 12 points 1 month ago

Real American Hero o7

[–] lemmygarden@lemmy.today 11 points 1 month ago

Don't take a plea deal. Get a jury trial and watch the jury nullification.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago

A bold strategy Cotton...

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Headline should read "Albuquerque starts arresting municipal volunteers who clean up the city"

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

Jesus Christ, what a fuckin hero in dark times this guy is.

"Hero arrested..."

Oh you know me I’ll be quirky.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

PSA: Just destroy them in place and leave them. Taking them with you can easily elevate charges to a felony theft/possession. Plus it gives the police and flock contractors more shit to haul off.

[–] Headofthebored@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

After some thinking, one of those handheld propane or map gas torches strapped to a long stick would probably, be the cheapest, quietest way to get rid of probably any pole camera. Not even a bulletproof metal one would stand up to even a few minutes of a torch. I would target only the lens area though. There is a lithium battery in them and overheating it would likely cause it to explode, drawing attention, and possibly shrapnel.

[–] modus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Truly an hero.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

He was just being nice and bringing them back to their rightful owners.. Us, the people who's taxes were used to pay for 24hr surveillance of us.

[–] the_wizard_of_0Z@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

He probably voted for trump but in this moment I love his ass. Fucking GOAT

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Making up for past mistakes.

Voting for Trump doesn't make a person a bad person, for many it just means they were duped or pressured, or simply saw the other party as the shittier of shit options. Definitely not an America-only problem.

Giving the praise and bringing back the "Were in this together" comradery is the basis for the US healing and recovering. Like when humanity bands together in an alien invasion movie. Then y'all can go back to squabbling in a few years when times are good again.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Voting for Trump doesn't make a person a bad person

No it just means they were already a bad person. Or stupid. Really really stupid. Almost as stupid as Trump.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To think that way of your fellow countrymen, it's very damaging for your society. It is fuel for the social division you have all been played into.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The damage to society is caused by the bad people who voted for the unconscionable moron.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Do you think the current situation is what they wanted? If they are bad people, they would be very happy with the outcome of their actions right now. Public opinion and general attitude strongly disagrees with that idea and therefore your opinion. However, it does fit well into the divisive tribalism sewn into your society's culture in the past 8 years.

I highly doubt your opinion will budge. So, 'very well done' to your shepherds. You're playing your part as planned. The person identical to you but splintered and steered into the other pen, doing their part just the same.

A society should show more concern for those that align with division than those that try to cause it. It means the wolves have found an exploitable 'in'. It means you're already diseased with the idea but only an ad populum fallacy can get through, weirdly.

[–] LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Do you think the current situation is what they wanted?

I agree with you about division but the answer to this question is yes. Unfortunately there is a not insignificant number of Americans who would be completely happy with the current situation if it was only affecting the “others” they were told it would.

It’s important to understand there is a difference between those people who are upset because of what’s happening, full stop, and those people who are upset because it’s happening to them.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yep. I think the point is, all hands should be shaking and starting action, not pointing fingers. The time for that is long gone and it's something the wolves are really depending on people to keep doing. It's a passive, non-threatening, waste of energy. It just It's divide and conquer 101.

Those participating in it are fuel to their own fire. They are not helping themselves or their fellow Americans in anyway. Accountability can come later if it really is needed, but there's bigger problems than a random Joe Smith that "voted for this" and socially ridiculing them is the perfect shot in one's own foot. Gotta be really gullable to fall for that.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Never will I ever shake hands with people who think it's okay to let pregnant women die, shove "others" into concentration camps, weaponize the government against dissidents and political opponents in bad faith, and rig elections, or be complicit in the rigging of elections, among other issues. Sorry not sorry.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Enjoy, then.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

yup, many are accelerationists' promoting a new civil war. and the rest are simply racist fucks who thought trump would be racist, but not drive the bus off the cliff.

fuck both of those crowds.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago

If they are bad people, they would be very happy with the outcome of their actions right now

Many of them very much are. In many ways it may not be but in some of the most important ones, it absolutely is. You can see this when all of Trump's endorsed candidates in the recent primaries won.

Public opinion and general attitude strongly disagrees with that idea and therefore your opinion.

In general? Sure, somewhat. Amongst his voters? Nah.

[–] FavouriteShapes@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Counter: The USA has a two party system.

I will elaborate if you want, but otherwise, no notes.

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

Most of them are just ignorant and poorly educated and they got duped. That doesn't make them irredeemably evil, they can learn to be better when approached the right way. They live in the most heavily propagandized nation to ever exist. Their reality is distorted and that distortion is reinforced every minute of every day by mainstream media corporations.

Trump is a different kind of stupid and he's surrounded and being used by people smarter than him with agendas that are worse than "make Trump look good" (which is Donnie's primary goal as he nears his end).

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

In a blue state, and taking down flock cameras. WHY would you assume he voted for Trump?

[–] degen@midwest.social -1 points 1 month ago

Truck is mighty big for a leftist. Might this be bipartisanaly based and goated?