this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2026
46 points (92.6% liked)

No Stupid Questions

49362 readers
1669 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I cannot wrap my head around the economics of the ad industry. They work to make your life worse in the most obnoxious and disgusting ways possible, and they - and any brand that works with then by association - are hated and reviled by that. Yet, it makes BILLIONS and companies spend billions on it, even if you seriously piss off your potential clients doing that (BMW's Spiderman ads, for example).

I don't get it.

EDIT: just to clarify, I don't think I'm a special snowflake immune to ads ffs. I'm talking about the ads in the enshittification spectrum, like the ones that blare inside the media center of your brand new car, the ones that makes sites unreadable, the ones shoved every minute in your 10 minute videos, things like that. But I understand that I may be inside my own ad hate bubble, I really dislike ads in general and I try to avoid them them best I can.

top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 6 points 4 hours ago

You run a Webshop without ads. You make 10 sales per day from organic traffic. That's $100 profit for you.

You pay $100 to an influencer to tell his followers about your shop. You get 500 sales and make $5000 profit.

Same with Google ads, it multiplies your sales and shows your products to new customers.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 18 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

because people are morons and ads work.

You can take a small box of cat shit and in the right ad campaign, people will buy it. Catshit has electrolytes.

[–] Cherry@piefed.social 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

People would probably sponsor it or rent it these days. Buying was 5 years ago.

Subscribe to watch a cat shit in a box, also give me your ID to qualify for the chance.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 hours ago

Kylie Jenner won't go anywhere without cat shit.

[–] it_depends_man@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

I don’t get it.

EDIT:

YOU can evade them, but most people can't.

It's some weird % math. Sending BS spam, like the good old nigerian prince, costs nearly nothing, but it only needs to work in like 1 in 10 million cases for it to be profitable. Returns on random spam advertisement is abysmal, and google gets like 10-100x that because it's more targeted. That is why people use google ads. But also not because they're good. They're just less useless, while still having a very very minimal effect.

The rest is scale.

[–] LongMember69@lemmy.world 46 points 13 hours ago
[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 24 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Despite the hatred, advertising works most of the time.

If nobody knows about your product or service, you can't make any money. Word of mouth doesn't cut it beyond a local store.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 12 points 12 hours ago

I ran a local store and word of mouth wasn’t nearly enough.

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

What's this Coca-Cola thing the kids are talking about these days?

[–] hayvan@piefed.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Man I can really go for a refreshing can of Coca Cola right now.

[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 22 points 13 hours ago

any brand that works with them by extension is hated and reviled by that.

That just isn’t true.

The advertising industry makes billions because ads make companies trillions. The advertising industry elects politicians and shapes public narratives and also rehabilitates public images.

I know this may shock you but people love ads. The Superbowl ads are almost as popular as the game. Some of the most successful comics troops working today are the troops that do insurance ads.

Hell there are company spokesmen who are international celebrities, The Most Interesting Man in the world, Lilly from AT&T.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 7 points 10 hours ago

Ads work. People browse or walk by something, there's a logo, video, or picture or some company or a product, it stays in their head, and they just keep buying shit they don't need. That's why. So the more people browse or happen upon ads, the more they sell (sometimes).

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 14 points 13 hours ago

Your view of people's feelings towards advertising is skewed. Likely by being around people who have the same feelings.

Most people don't hate companies because they advertise.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The advertising you are seeing doesn't work that well on you. I'm in the same boat. That doesn't mean it doesn't work. There's a ton of advertising where I'm a net negative. That doesn't mean the overall output is negative.

[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

And it's probably not even true that ads don't work on OP. Everyone likes to think they're built different.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

That's why I specified the ads OP was seeing. For me, there might be ads that are seemless with something else in doing that I don't notice and might work. But in OPs example in his reasons to you, fuck any fucking company that puts an ad inside my goddamn car. Ads at the gas pump can get fucked as well.

[–] tigerjerusalem@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Not my case at all, I can see the value of an ad made by a content creator I like. My complain is about things that falls into the enshittification spectrum, like ads on the media center of their brand new cars. I know I would be pissed off by it, but maybe I'm on my own bubble of ad hate.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like im a special snowflake virtually immune to ads. The large part of it is im just unwilling to pay for anything that is unnecessary now. Mostly out of necessity but the longer I have to be like this the more all of it seems silly and I feel that even if I had discretionary income I don't see wanting to use it. Still would like to renovate where I live but that is mostly around disability and reducing energy use. eating out nope. movies nope. any other paid entertainment nope. internet and computer yep. smartphone nope. linux yep. windows nope. mac nope.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I feel like im a special snowflake virtually immune to ads.

For the most part, I don't even see ads at all.

The only ones I might be exposed to at all are:

  • Disguised Lemmy posts pretending to be normal users.

  • Billboards and other signs on the side of the road.

  • Product placement in a game, TV show, or movie.

Every other kind of ad has basically zero chance of ever even reaching my eyeballs.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

If ads were truly that reviled, adblockers would be more popular. Most people either don't care at all, or don't care enough to change anything about how they use media. You can literally set up a way to consume their media without ads for them and most people will refuse to use it over the slightest inconvenience, such as "I don't like Firefox".

[–] Z745812939054@lemmy.zip 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

the stupid rhymes and jingles aren't meant for anyone to like them, they're specifically designed to get stuck in your head, regardless if the thing itself is relevant to you. WE ARE FARMERS ! BUMBADUMBABUMBUMBUM! you literally just sang that in your head. whether you meant to or not.

mind control and psychological manipulation are real and powerful things. they wouldn't be spending the money on it if that weren't the case. it's about taking up as much space in your brain as possible, so that you have no space left for the competition's jingle

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

This is not, in any meaningful way, mind control. It's just making something memorable. You don't become a mindless zombie because you listened to a jingle. Instead, it just means that when Jerry, who is really busy because of his kids and career and hobbies has State Farm hike his rates, he will think "those motherfuckers! Who else sells insurance?" And will then remember the jingle.

[–] Z745812939054@lemmy.zip 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

if you've deliberately changed someone's behavior to align with what you want, then who cares what anyone calls it? the end result is the same- the ads worked

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, sure. But if that's your standard for "mind control" then asking someone to pass the salt counts, too

[–] Z745812939054@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 hours ago
[–] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip 1 points 12 hours ago

We know a thing or two because we've seen a thing or two.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

The power of suggestion is intense. That's why propaganda works so well too. They manipulate the masses to buy products and it works really well.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 12 hours ago

I don't inherently hate advertising and have on occasion learned about products or brands through advertising that I then actually ended up buying. Without advertising, you too might not know a lot of the products you've bought in your life.

I do block most ads online, but still see plenty of advertising in public spaces, or on television or radio when I watch/listen to those.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 hours ago

I will tell you, as someone who runs a business and doesn’t really advertise, you need ads to actually make money. I do not make enough to rely on my business as a sole source of income. I also do not have enough money to spend on effective advertising. So basically I’m stuck unless I want to take venture capital money (I don’t).

[–] Cherry@piefed.social 1 points 10 hours ago

I think one other thing is people associate ads with the old way, something posted, flashing at the side of a screen, rather than the full range from product placement to shilling and influence online. No one can avoid ads but you can certainly take steps to, and to also not be so swayed.

I have really started to practice anti consumerism. I try to only buy when i have to, and question what i need/want...do i really or is it an outside influence making me want it. Even trips etc. I feel like i am going backwards a bit but i wanna be my own person. If i cant trust ads just vote with your economic power.

[–] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 2 points 12 hours ago

What don't you get? They advertise a product, they get paid for that. Some ads are liked, some aren't. Most companies of any decent size advertise, and they pay for that in order to garner more sales. I don't think the general public revile them for it at all.

[–] supersquirrel@lemmy.ca 1 points 13 hours ago

If everyone is so concerned about smartphones and social media ruining our attention span than where is the moral panic around advertisements slicing up everything into smaller and smaller chunks seperated by unrelated maximally superficial content?

hmmmm

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Because they are funded by literally almost every other industry and business on the planet, small and large. They have established themselves as the critical and inescapable middleman between consumers and providers, not necessarily directly or exclusively but in every practical way possible and in such subtle ways that it's not always obvious how much they actually control. They are the gatekeepers of all commerce, they control the information of even knowing what businesses exist and what they do and are the only way of finding them and are often the only way of finding a price too. All commerce flows through them, and so they inevitably take their cut of all that business. Few other industries are as widespread through the rest of the economy as advertising is, and none are able to establish effective monopolies as easily as advertising has.

Oil comes close, but even oil is ultimately a commodity that can be take from or moved around from place to place for the right price. It doesn't separate businesses from their consumers the way advertising does. A business or consumer can find a different source for oil -- but they have to use information to do that. And the advertising industry controls most of the information.

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

This sounds like a weird conspiracy theory. Communicating with potential customers that your product exists and is good isn't some concept that the advertising industry has somehow wrested from the hands of good hardworking people in return for their wages. It's what marketing and advertising IS. It's like saying the cheeseburger industry controls our access to cheeseburgers - like, kinda. But also, that's kind of definitionally true. You can, of course, raise and slaughter your own cow to subvert the cheeseburger industry. And you can hand out fliers you made yourself advertising your business on the streetcorner. But it is a lot less work, and you'll probably get a better product, if you outsource the work to a specialist

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know how that's a conspiracy. Like you suggest, it's basically tautological, that's what advertising/marketing IS by definition. Whether you think that's a bad thing or not (I do in almost all of its current forms) is an entirely different question and a matter of opinion, and while I might be guilty of letting that opinion leak into my commentary I also don't see a lot of facts we actually seem to disagree on, so I'm not really sure what else there is to discuss. I don't think it would be productive to get into the weeds of why I think that's such a bad thing, it's not really relevant to the question that was asked. I just thought understanding the profit motives that make the advertising industry so lucrative would probably be pretty useful to appreciate why the industry is the way it is.

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 0 points 10 hours ago

I'm just saying

They have established themselves as the critical and inescapable middleman between consumers and providers, not necessarily directly or exclusively but in every practical way possible and in such subtle ways that it’s not always obvious how much they actually control.

You can hear the creepy piano music when you read this

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth -1 points 12 hours ago