this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2026
152 points (98.1% liked)

Linux

18666 readers
126 users here now

Welcome to c/linux!

Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!

Rules:

  1. Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.

  2. Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.

  3. Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.

  4. No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.

  5. No NSFW adult content

  6. Follow general lemmy guidelines.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Janx@piefed.social 27 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Fucking nerds, man. Why can't we learn to work together!?

[–] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 15 points 3 days ago

Forking this comment because it didn't include a reference to me.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 days ago

Probably autism for a solid portion of them. Some form of neurodivergence for nearly all of them.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 52 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 28 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm not sure I like your attitude, so I'm starting my own thread down below and everyone else is welcome to join me there.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago
[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 46 points 4 days ago (2 children)

A core feature of any mature FOSS project.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 11 points 4 days ago

As a maintainer, you can just ignore it most of the time 👌😎

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 3 points 4 days ago

Well at least one aspect is mature

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 25 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Bonkers that its the default on many distros instead of qbittorrent

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 48 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

it's qbittorrent, not gbittorrent. that's really why.

transmission has been the default on so many gnome-based distributions for a very long time because of its gtk frontend.. it also has a qt frontend, curses cli, daemon, windows qt build, and native mac versions...

qbittorrent also runs on more than just linux, but is qt. only qt. how many qt-only applications find their way into the default package set for gnome or gtk desktops released by debian, ubuntu, mint, fedora, redhat, suse, etc, etc.

[–] Dultas@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Yeah, I much prefer cli front ends over web ones as all my torrent boxes have been headless. I realize with most client server archs I could connect via gui but still I prefer cli.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It does what it used to do 15 years ago and it does it well. The arr-stack tried to make me use qBittorrent. I said no and did it with Transmission anyway.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

Qbt likewise has been doing it for 20 years and doing it well 🤷

Works great in my friends arr stack

[–] bright_side_@piefed.world 11 points 4 days ago
[–] comrademiao@piefed.social 6 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Why does anyone use this over qbit?

[–] amorpheus@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Tried both, qBittorrent is much heavier on the CPU just sitting there idling. I do have a large amount of torrents, maybe over 200, and I didn't expect to notice such a difference.

[–] Vegan_Joe@anarchist.nexus 21 points 4 days ago (3 children)

It's lightweight, open source, and does exactly what it's supposed to.

I kind of legacyed my way into it. It was the first thing I grabbed after uTorrent went to hell decades ago.

What is the advantage of qbit over it?

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago

I2p torrenting is supported by QBitTorrent not transmission. Transmission is simple, clean, lightweight and does the thing. QB is a million knobs dials and levers and comparatively heavier though not offensively so.

[–] PabloSexcrowbar@piefed.social 9 points 4 days ago

Qbittorrent feels a lot closer to what uTorrent used to be, while Transmission has more of a Mac-style simplicity to it.

[–] comrademiao@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago

My main point of concern is most of my indexes often ban versions of transmission but I never see that for qbit.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don't often use BitTorrent at all, but Transmission is certainly the first client that comes to my mind, probably mainly because it came preinstalled with the distros I used when I was new to Linux (Debian and Ubuntu in the late 2000s). Not sure what advantages there are either way.

[–] comrademiao@piefed.social 3 points 4 days ago

That makes sense, qbit was the first recommended to me too.

[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It works great headless on my server. It does what it is supposed to do without any bloat that I would not use anyway.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Headless means no GUI is it? How do you go aout getting used to these programs

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

For things like this, the system you leave running the client all the time isn’t always the system you actually sit down and use. So it’s common for there to be a webUI, waypiping the GUI, or good old fashioned CLI

[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Do your mean how I use it? With a remote client and other services use the RPC API. How to get used to it? Being a lifelong nerd?

That is pretty good.