this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2026
502 points (96.1% liked)

memes

22431 readers
3255 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] justdaveisfine@piefed.social 70 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I still consider it HD lol

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 52 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Aneb@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Cartoons, absolutely. Live action, 1080p is perfect for 4k TVs without needing 4k stream and it saves GBs.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

It still is, but nobody cares anymore. At 16:9 1920x1080 is considered "Full High Definition," and 3840x2160 (at minimum) is "Ultra High Definition," at least in terms of their official marketing speak. The latter has mutated to include both 4K and 8K content somehow, apparently because the brainworms in the marketing department ran out of superlatives after "Ultra."

[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

They should've hired tea industry execs. If the tea industry can come up with grades like "Special Finest Tippy Golden Flowery Orange Pekoe", they can come up with something beyond Ultra High Definition.

Maybe like this:

  • High Definition (HD)
  • Full High Definition (FHD)
  • Ultra High Definition (UHD)
  • Very Ultra High Definition (VUHD)
  • Special Very Ultra High Definition (SVUHD)
  • Full Special Very Ultra High Definition (FSVUHD or SVUHD1, both are acceptable)

Not that these grades would only apply to displays that don't support picture-in-picture or split screen. Displays with those features ("broken" displays) would use the following equivalent grades instead:

  • High Broken Definition (HBD)
  • Full High Broken Definition (FHBD)
  • Ultra High Broken Definition (UHBD)
  • Golden Ultra High Broken Definition (GUHBD)
  • Special Golden Ultra High Broken Definition (SGUHBD)
  • Full Special Golden Ultra High Broken Definition 1 (FSGUHBD1)
[–] Dookieman12@piefed.social 11 points 2 weeks ago
  • T = Television
  • IT = Intelligent Television
  • HIT = Highly Intelligent Television
  • SHIT = Super Highly Intelligent Television
[–] Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] feannag@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

We could just use the radio bands, just with definition instead of frequency.
High
Very high
Ultra high
Super high
Extremely high
Tremendously high

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

It still is.

720 = HD 1080 = Full HD

Then I think there's UHD, before they start labelling them as shortened numbers like 8k

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Botzo@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I remember the 720p vs 1080i wars ...

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Interlacing is trash, fight me

[–] Botzo@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Whoa there: I said "I remember", not that interlacing was good.

And interlacing is only "good"for old video games that leveraged its weirdness for blending pixels.

It is terrible as a video format.

Remember when your dvd player had a "progressive scan" button?

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Like I could afford a DVD player

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 7 points 2 weeks ago

720p is still better than 1080i

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Standard definition, high definition, full high definition, ultra definition, AI upscaled ultra high definition, nuclear holocaust definition, stone age definition

[–] Davel23@fedia.io 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Don't forget enhanced definition.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago
[–] itisileclerk@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

And 1080p is Full HD.
1440p is Quad HD.
2160p/4K is Ultra HD.
4320p/8K is also Ultra HD, for some bonus confusion.

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

720p hits that sweet spot between file size and picture clarity so that's my default preference for torrents.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I remember TVs that were "HD compatible" which means they were like 520p, but could downscale an HD signal.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

1280 × 720 was "HD ready"
1920 × 1080 was "Full HD"

I always thought "HD ready" was a bit of a marketing scam.

[–] captcha_incorrect@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

I remember ”HD ready” as HDR, then years later HDR (high dynamic range) came a was very confused as to way a 1080p monitor was marked as HD Ready.

[–] notsure@fedia.io 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

remember when vhs only recorded 250 lines? remember when it was 240 by 320, remember when, fuck you....I remembeer when amber and greeen were the only colors....

[–] notsure@fedia.io 9 points 2 weeks ago

...and yes, grandpa is pissed about your 256 color gradient...

[–] gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org 10 points 2 weeks ago

i still go for 720 all the time because at a certain resolution, you're just starting to see the pimples, at not extra benefit.

[–] IdontplaytheTrombone@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It's still good on phone screens.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 weeks ago

It's still good on PC monitors with astigmatism :')

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] StaticFalconar@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

On a small enough screen it still is.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago

I remember when 480p was called Enhanced Definition.

I still have a widescreen ED CRT with an HDMI port in the garage, it’s the best Wii screen ever made.

[–] squirrel@cake.kobel.fyi 6 points 2 weeks ago
[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't mind 720p at all, but I play a lot of old games and usually upscaling to 720p on PlayStation 2 games and stuff makes a tremendous difference.

Anything older, CRT filters. Bloom and interlacing make games like Super Metroid very eerie.

[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 weeks ago

IMO at the same bitrate 720p looks leagues better than 1080p apples to apples. It's my preferred trick for shitty internet connections since 720p just gets the job done still.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Remember when 1080i was a thing? Now it's all but dead beyond broadcast and cable TV (which is pretty much dead).

People used to say that 720p was better because it had a higher vertical resolution at any given moment due to being progressive scan, but IMO 1080i looked sharper for the most part unless there was a lot of motion in the scene. The resolution was high enough that the flickering from the interlaced images didn't bother me. So I usually went with 1080i over 720p. Sports titles and games with a lot of action were the only time when I would go with 720p.

[–] freudian_slop@programming.dev 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I still watch 360p on my phone lol.

load more comments (2 replies)

the bitrate of yt 720p sucks

[–] UntouchedWagons@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago

In my opinion 1920x1080 should be the baseline "standard definition" nowadays.

[–] lyrial@anarchist.nexus 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

My still functional xbmc media server never knew that because I couldn't afford the HD plugs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Watching Naruto on a streaming website at 360p 4:3

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's "put it on a flash drive, shove it up your ass, and smuggle it over the border into north korea" resolution

[–] dzsimbo@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 weeks ago

I haven't seen that US standard of measurement yet! I didn't know they do resolution as well.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Remember way back when you found a 480p torrent, and you thought it was good eatin'?

[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 5 points 2 weeks ago

Honestly, In My Opinion, 480p is still completely acceptable for anime and cartoons. Most of that definition is used on the exact same colour blocks so HD doesn't make s humongous difference. Still nice to have of course, but I don't hesitate to go 480p if internet is choppy

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

I remember when youtube basically only had one format and I'm pretty sure it was 240p lol.

load more comments
view more: next ›