this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2026
1296 points (97.4% liked)

Work Reform

17038 readers
1531 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

What I'm hearing is NY Democrats are working to pass a bill that will increase prices at businesses using self-checkout by 10 percent. They aren't going to cut into their own profits.

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 1 points 32 minutes ago

Politics is never about helping people, it's about creating the IMPRESSION that you're helping people.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

The fun part that I have heard from a few retail managers is that the software that the self checkout uses costs as much or more per month than the employee would have.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (4 children)

Right, because if I self checkout my $200 grocery bill, that worker definitely would have made $20 in that few minute interaction.

I like the idea, but that's a terrible implementation. The cost of the bill has no relation to the money saved by using the machine and firing a worker. A flat amount no more than a % of the bill is tiny would be better. Like $1-3 but no more than 5% of bill.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

200 grocery bill, that worker definitely would have made $20 in that few minute interaction.

So the fact that the store would lose more money to the 10% discount is what incentivizes them to use cashiers.

All y'all tripping over making these 2 numbers equivalent are missing the point entirely.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world -1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

I'm not missing the point, funny enough it seems to be you that has.

Something should be done, but this is NOT the way to do it. I'm sorry you can't understand that.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Of course not.

We shouldnt dare do it in a way that hurts the poor company.

Perhaps we should solve it by making customers pay a fee for using self checkout! You know, those poor, downtrodden businesses really do need all the help they can get.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

And this, ladies and gentlemen, is why big business gets away with everything.

Cause theres juuust enough idiots out there to cry and scream about how its big mean and supes unfair to hold them accountable for anything, and that any punishments should totally be insigifnicant that doesnt impact them at all.

[–] sgrakus@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

It’s ultimately just a bill that would kill the self checkout which maybe that is their intention.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Self checkout isnt a bad thing in and of itself.

If you only get one or two items, or something that you find personally embarassing, self checkout is fine.

Thet problem is there are no more cashiers, and I'm expected to take my monthly groceries through self checkout, which is a fucking chore. and I totally deserve at least 10% for the chore of dealing with it, as well with the added stress that a harmless fuckup might result in me being fucking tackled to the asphalt in the parking lot by some overzealous loss prevention/cop, and see me arrested for theft.

so I dont want to see it go away, but there definitely needs to be regulation, like..1 self checkout for every 3 staffed cashier registers or something.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

If it's written as that image describes, I don't even think they intend to pass it, they just wanted the headlines, but that would be the ultimate goal as written if so and it passed.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

They should have to pay a tax equal to that of employing someone. They will get efficiency and more days activity without leave and overtime costs.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Something like this is more along the right way to address something like this, and it fits the more broader issue with automation across multiple areas.

[–] Tolc@lemmy.world -4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

"democrats" "fighting for worker rights", are we doing this in big 26? No wonder american left is dead.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 1 points 55 minutes ago* (last edited 53 minutes ago)

Who do you propose to stand up? Orange lunatic team sure isn't, if you look long enough, they're helping bleed us dry.

It is a weird bill, maybe it's a scare tactic.

load more comments
view more: next ›